Victory happened in the beginning, as is the case with most predictable causality chains.

i’m always a jerk. it’s kind of my style. doesn’t make me wrong. it just rattles would-be svengalis like yourself when you find that you have nothing to contribute.

you’re the one who seems to be coming a bit unhinged, making lengthy posts to yourself that apparently no one but you cares about and then claiming what? victory?

sheesh

peace

hahhahahahahahahahahhhahahaha

you’re having an argument with yourself buddy. there’s no way that i can lose it. lol

peace

err, try to keep up:

“if i were to even deem to address your points, i would have to agree that ‘they’ are indeed in the wrong and that the israeli’s are in the right. i’m not going to do that. that sort of siimplistic thinking is probably at the root of your problems.”

–the ‘they’ that i was referring to in this post was in relation to this from danny,

“I like to paraphrase the Israeli gentleman who said (to paraphrase), if “they” put down their weapons, the result is peace. If we put down our weapons, they kill us”.”

–where he was describing the moral superiority of isral over an amorphous ‘they’ which i can only assume means their enemies in pakistan and southern lebanon.

i was saying that i reject the premise as simplistic that israel has the historical moral high ground and that ‘they’ are single-mindedly bent on israel’s destruction.

all of which is besides the point because none of what i wrote has ANYTHING to do with the ridiculous drivel you were writing about ‘partisanship’?????

peace

if i were to even deem to address your points, i would have to agree that ‘they’ are indeed in the wrong and that the israeli’s are in the right. i’m not going to do that. that sort of siimplistic thinking is probably at the root of your problems.

That reply to Danny is only indicative of what I’m refering to, when you apply partisanship division to your writing.

I could find more, had I a willingness to waste time cataloguing Dagon’s posts.

“Dagon partisan likeship.”

elaborate please.

peace

It is ideologically restricted because most of one class is on the left and most of the other class is right of center. But even then, these restrictions have their own exceptions, because I’ve seen people on the right like David F and Roach who act like those on the left who disagree with me.

So ideologically restricted, but it’s not Dagon partisan likeship.

I remember that there are still some old dogs that won’t convert. Like Christopher Hitchins, those who signed that uh mandate or whatever telling Democrats that they are busting the little man by opposing the Iraq War not only before it began but attempting to sabotage it after it began and before it was ended.

Neo Neocon wrote something about that mandate, starts with an E I believe.

terrific, now i know exactly what kind of crack you are smoking and can feel comfortable putting you on permanent ignore.

Everyone who argues with me more or less always ends up ignoring me, because they can’t win and they won’t admit defeat. So go ahead.

There are some exceptions of course, and those exceptions are ideologically restricted. However, you don’t show any signs of being an exception, Dagon, to the rule.

You can win an argument by caring less about the subject than the other guy. Since you show more emotion than I, you are at a natural disadvantage, and nothing you have said here, has changed that fact.

Whoever wins in the end game, is the guy who is calmer and the one who takes sight of the long range goals. If any of you prefer Dagon’s short term goals, then go ahead, but it won’t convince me.