<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What effect will the good news have?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5227</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5227</guid>
		<description>Yes but don't they still need the Senate to pass any legislation?  And if they actually manage to get that, they still have to muster a veto-proof majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but don&#8217;t they still need the Senate to pass any legislation?  And if they actually manage to get that, they still have to muster a veto-proof majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>If the Democrats take over, they will corrupt the system to ensure that no Republican administration will ever get reelected. They came very close in 2000 and 2004 (does anyone remember the "motor voter" act, Al Gore's rapid-approval of citizenship rights for millions of illegals, including fellons, in critical swing cities so that they could vote, the hanging chads?). Fundamentally, the Democrat/Left is a totalitarian Utopian movement. Let's stop kidding ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Democrats take over, they will corrupt the system to ensure that no Republican administration will ever get reelected. They came very close in 2000 and 2004 (does anyone remember the &#8220;motor voter&#8221; act, Al Gore&#8217;s rapid-approval of citizenship rights for millions of illegals, including fellons, in critical swing cities so that they could vote, the hanging chads?). Fundamentally, the Democrat/Left is a totalitarian Utopian movement. Let&#8217;s stop kidding ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5225</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5225</guid>
		<description>mamapajamas-

A takeover in the Senate would be disastrous since there are still a couple of the liberal justices that are well over the average life expectancy (not to be a vulture or anything.)  The Republicans still need the ability to confirm Bush's judicial nominations so the Senate is imperative.  The House, on the other hand, would be forced into making some hard decisions which Jonah Goldberg pointed out in his article.  Basically, a couple of years of Pelosi as Speaker (having to appease the extreme left element or risk their alienation) would light a fire under the Republicans and drive the centrists away from the Democratic party in droves; '08 would be a banner year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mamapajamas-</p>
<p>A takeover in the Senate would be disastrous since there are still a couple of the liberal justices that are well over the average life expectancy (not to be a vulture or anything.)  The Republicans still need the ability to confirm Bush&#8217;s judicial nominations so the Senate is imperative.  The House, on the other hand, would be forced into making some hard decisions which Jonah Goldberg pointed out in his article.  Basically, a couple of years of Pelosi as Speaker (having to appease the extreme left element or risk their alienation) would light a fire under the Republicans and drive the centrists away from the Democratic party in droves; &#8216;08 would be a banner year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5224</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5224</guid>
		<description>I saw gas for $1.99/gallon in Cleveland, Tennessee over the weekend....anyone beat that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw gas for $1.99/gallon in Cleveland, Tennessee over the weekend&#8230;.anyone beat that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5223</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5223</guid>
		<description>Impeachement isn't all that of a danger, in my view, simply because it would get the Democrats out in a position, a limb if you will, from which they will be unable to extricate themselves in the eyes of the military and the civilian spheres of America.

All they'll get is Cheney if they get rid of Bush, and Bush can't get re-elected, so this would be Cheney's only chance of doing damage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeachement isn&#8217;t all that of a danger, in my view, simply because it would get the Democrats out in a position, a limb if you will, from which they will be unable to extricate themselves in the eyes of the military and the civilian spheres of America.</p>
<p>All they&#8217;ll get is Cheney if they get rid of Bush, and Bush can&#8217;t get re-elected, so this would be Cheney&#8217;s only chance of doing damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamapajamas</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5222</link>
		<dc:creator>mamapajamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5222</guid>
		<description>A Democrat take-over in Congress is something to worry about.  Imagine unending battles to stop tax increases, illegal alien anmesty, runaway spending, etc etc etc.

Yes, we're having a problem getting the Republicans to move on sealing the borders.  But the Democrats actively want to leave it wide open and invite illegals in.

Which is better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Democrat take-over in Congress is something to worry about.  Imagine unending battles to stop tax increases, illegal alien anmesty, runaway spending, etc etc etc.</p>
<p>Yes, we&#8217;re having a problem getting the Republicans to move on sealing the borders.  But the Democrats actively want to leave it wide open and invite illegals in.</p>
<p>Which is better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5221</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5221</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jonah Goldberg's analysis http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2006/09/18/bring_on_the_democrats (posted by Bookworm--&lt;b&gt;I agree with his point, but I love his writing even more&lt;/b&gt;) that loosing the House could prove to be beneficial in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jonah Goldberg&#8217;s analysis <a href="http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2006/09/18/bring_on_the_democrats" rel="nofollow">http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JonahGoldberg/2006/09/18/bring_on_the_democrats</a> (posted by Bookworm&#8211;<b>I agree with his point, but I love his writing even more</b>) that loosing the House could prove to be beneficial in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erp</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5220</link>
		<dc:creator>erp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5220</guid>
		<description>h/t Drudge

From &lt;a HREF="http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/092606/iraqfunding.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;The Hill&lt;/A&gt;:


&lt;i&gt;Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) will chair the powerful Ways and Means Committee if Democrats win control of the House next year, but his main goal in 2007 does not fall within his panel’s jurisdiction.

“I can’t stop this war,” a frustrated Rangel said in a recent interview, reiterating his vow to retire from Congress if Democrats fall short of a majority in the House.

But when pressed on how he could stop the war even if Democrats control the House during the last years of President Bush’s second term, Rangel paused before saying, “You’ve got to be able to pay for the war, don’t you?”&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>h/t Drudge</p>
<p>From <a HREF="http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/092606/iraqfunding.html" rel="nofollow">The Hill</a>:</p>
<p><i>Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) will chair the powerful Ways and Means Committee if Democrats win control of the House next year, but his main goal in 2007 does not fall within his panel’s jurisdiction.</p>
<p>“I can’t stop this war,” a frustrated Rangel said in a recent interview, reiterating his vow to retire from Congress if Democrats fall short of a majority in the House.</p>
<p>But when pressed on how he could stop the war even if Democrats control the House during the last years of President Bush’s second term, Rangel paused before saying, “You’ve got to be able to pay for the war, don’t you?”</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erp</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5219</link>
		<dc:creator>erp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5219</guid>
		<description>The deficit has been plummeting because of increased revenues and further tax cuts will keep those revenues going up.  That'll stop if Dems are in control because the first thing they'll do is increase taxes which will result in lower revenues. I don't think even a media blitz can convince many voters that liberals will keep down spending.  The idea is risible.

Also, how can Reid, Pelosi, Kerry el al. make our country and the world a safe place.  In the eight years Clinton was in charge, terrorism expanded and became organized.  Get the libs back in power and we'll put the U.N. back in charge of our foreign policy of appeasement.  Don't think so?  Check out Clinton's CYA performance over the weekend and then think again.   Neither he nor his followers understand that the WoT isn't a public relations campaign.  Clinton's legacy isn't what matters.  What matters if the safety of our kids.  Yes, it really is for the children, especially my six grandchildren.

If the different factions on the right come out of their communal snit and get to the polls, I think the GOP will gain in both houses and in the governorships.  The left will be left with only voter fraud and other shenanigans like another switcheroo Democratic senatorial candidate in New Jersey.  Will Jersey voters ever get tired of voting for the scoundrels with the letter "D" next to their names on the ballot.  Perhaps we'll find out this year.

I'm astonished that anyone can support the current crop of liberals even if one truly believes socialism is the better way of organizing society, shouldn't they be putting up people with some semblance of honesty and integrity for voters' approval.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deficit has been plummeting because of increased revenues and further tax cuts will keep those revenues going up.  That&#8217;ll stop if Dems are in control because the first thing they&#8217;ll do is increase taxes which will result in lower revenues. I don&#8217;t think even a media blitz can convince many voters that liberals will keep down spending.  The idea is risible.</p>
<p>Also, how can Reid, Pelosi, Kerry el al. make our country and the world a safe place.  In the eight years Clinton was in charge, terrorism expanded and became organized.  Get the libs back in power and we&#8217;ll put the U.N. back in charge of our foreign policy of appeasement.  Don&#8217;t think so?  Check out Clinton&#8217;s CYA performance over the weekend and then think again.   Neither he nor his followers understand that the WoT isn&#8217;t a public relations campaign.  Clinton&#8217;s legacy isn&#8217;t what matters.  What matters if the safety of our kids.  Yes, it really is for the children, especially my six grandchildren.</p>
<p>If the different factions on the right come out of their communal snit and get to the polls, I think the GOP will gain in both houses and in the governorships.  The left will be left with only voter fraud and other shenanigans like another switcheroo Democratic senatorial candidate in New Jersey.  Will Jersey voters ever get tired of voting for the scoundrels with the letter &#8220;D&#8221; next to their names on the ballot.  Perhaps we&#8217;ll find out this year.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m astonished that anyone can support the current crop of liberals even if one truly believes socialism is the better way of organizing society, shouldn&#8217;t they be putting up people with some semblance of honesty and integrity for voters&#8217; approval.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webloggin</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2006/09/25/what-effect-will-the-good-news-have/#comment-5218</link>
		<dc:creator>Webloggin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=841#comment-5218</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What effect will the good news have?&lt;/strong&gt;

Democrats would never let good news deter them from fearing the worst. Dems will vote Democrat, Cons will vote Conservative, the borders will stay open and nothing will really change.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What effect will the good news have?</strong></p>
<p>Democrats would never let good news deter them from fearing the worst. Dems will vote Democrat, Cons will vote Conservative, the borders will stay open and nothing will really change.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
