<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If they&#8217;re so good, why do we need a law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10359</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 02:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10359</guid>
		<description>That's OK, JJ, my own posts here have been rather dyslexic of-late, and you know how Book hates poor spelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s OK, JJ, my own posts here have been rather dyslexic of-late, and you know how Book hates poor spelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10358</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10358</guid>
		<description>"Or less."  Geez...  Meant to say: "Or else..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Or less.&#8221;  Geez&#8230;  Meant to say: &#8220;Or else&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10357</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10357</guid>
		<description>I think there are exceptions to that, though, Danny.  or less there exists a way around it.  California has had a separate standard for car emissions for years, I believe, have they not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are exceptions to that, though, Danny.  or less there exists a way around it.  California has had a separate standard for car emissions for years, I believe, have they not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10356</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10356</guid>
		<description>Good point, Book. It would be an interesting exercise to calculate how much it would cost California taxpayers to make the switch. I am sure that someone could challenge this under the Interstate Commerce clause, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Book. It would be an interesting exercise to calculate how much it would cost California taxpayers to make the switch. I am sure that someone could challenge this under the Interstate Commerce clause, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10360</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10360</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure, Larry.  I have old lights, though, that take only chandelier bulbs, and I've never found that a decent fit with the fluorescents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure, Larry.  I have old lights, though, that take only chandelier bulbs, and I&#8217;ve never found that a decent fit with the fluorescents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10361</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10361</guid>
		<description>What is it about California's obsession to cultivate peoples' inner nanny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it about California&#8217;s obsession to cultivate peoples&#8217; inner nanny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10362</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10362</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;As it is, Assemblyman Lloyd Levine’s bill strikes me as unnecessary and costly, insofar as it will require expensive government oversight over something that’s happening naturally and without any government effort at all.&lt;/b&gt;

The Big Business pays is costs, so... he has to vote the way he is paid to. Nothing too complex there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>As it is, Assemblyman Lloyd Levine’s bill strikes me as unnecessary and costly, insofar as it will require expensive government oversight over something that’s happening naturally and without any government effort at all.</b></p>
<p>The Big Business pays is costs, so&#8230; he has to vote the way he is paid to. Nothing too complex there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Faren</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10363</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Faren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10363</guid>
		<description>Hey BW, will the spiral bulbs work OK in a lamp whose shade uses those two-loop wires to grasp the bulb?  It's something I asked last Friday on my blog -- but nobody has offered an answer.  Sounds like you may have it: "Some don’t handle them at all."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey BW, will the spiral bulbs work OK in a lamp whose shade uses those two-loop wires to grasp the bulb?  It&#8217;s something I asked last Friday on my blog &#8212; but nobody has offered an answer.  Sounds like you may have it: &#8220;Some don’t handle them at all.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/01/31/if-theyre-so-good-why-do-we-need-a-law/#comment-10364</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1291#comment-10364</guid>
		<description>I love California.  It's the most reliable place in the universe.

Wouldn't live there on a bet, of course; but, like the rest of the country, I get a lot of innocent fun out of hearing/reading what you guys will be up to next.  You never disappoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love California.  It&#8217;s the most reliable place in the universe.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t live there on a bet, of course; but, like the rest of the country, I get a lot of innocent fun out of hearing/reading what you guys will be up to next.  You never disappoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
