<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco has bigger scandals than a debauched mayor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Freedom of speech on trial at SFSU &#171; Bookworm Room</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10748</link>
		<dc:creator>Freedom of speech on trial at SFSU &#171; Bookworm Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10748</guid>
		<description>[...] of speech on trial at&#160;SFSU A month ago, I wrote about dhimmitude run amok at San Francisco State University in San Francisco, where the University had announced its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of speech on trial at&nbsp;SFSU A month ago, I wrote about dhimmitude run amok at San Francisco State University in San Francisco, where the University had announced its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nut House &#187; THE COUNCIL HAS SPOKEN: DOUBLE-ICIOUS EDITION</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10751</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nut House &#187; THE COUNCIL HAS SPOKEN: DOUBLE-ICIOUS EDITION</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10751</guid>
		<description>[...] 1st Place: &#8220;San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor&#8221; by Bookworm Room [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1st Place: &#8220;San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor&#8221; by Bookworm Room [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isirota1965</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10756</link>
		<dc:creator>isirota1965</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10756</guid>
		<description>What a fabulous post, Bookworm.  I hope that you don't mind, but I am going to cut and paste it into an e-mail and circulate it (with the proper attribution, of course).  Thank you..............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fabulous post, Bookworm.  I hope that you don&#8217;t mind, but I am going to cut and paste it into an e-mail and circulate it (with the proper attribution, of course).  Thank you&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10752</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Council Has Spoken!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10752</guid>
		<description>[...] its picks for the most outstanding posts of the preceding week. The winning Council post was Bookworm Room&#8217;s post, “San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor”. Second place honors went to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its picks for the most outstanding posts of the preceding week. The winning Council post was Bookworm Room&#8217;s post, “San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor”. Second place honors went to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10753</link>
		<dc:creator>The Glittering Eye &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Eye on the Watcher&#8217;s Council</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10753</guid>
		<description>[...] Bookworm Room, “San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bookworm Room, “San Francisco Has Bigger Scandals Than a Debauched Mayor” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhombre</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10754</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhombre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10754</guid>
		<description>The brief report I read on the internet stated the assailant had been trailing Wiesel for weeks.  How do you know he was even from San Fran?  I think that is rather thin reasoning to condemn the entire SF Congressional district on the basis of one anti semite stalker.  Not that SF isn't a hotbed of trendy lefties but this nutcase who accosted W. might be from a compound in Montana for all we know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brief report I read on the internet stated the assailant had been trailing Wiesel for weeks.  How do you know he was even from San Fran?  I think that is rather thin reasoning to condemn the entire SF Congressional district on the basis of one anti semite stalker.  Not that SF isn&#8217;t a hotbed of trendy lefties but this nutcase who accosted W. might be from a compound in Montana for all we know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Schuler</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10750</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Schuler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10750</guid>
		<description>FWIW the assault on Wiesel took place in Nancy Pelosi's congressional district.  I don't think that says anything about Ms. Pelosi herself but it's sadly suggestive of the people who elected her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW the assault on Wiesel took place in Nancy Pelosi&#8217;s congressional district.  I don&#8217;t think that says anything about Ms. Pelosi herself but it&#8217;s sadly suggestive of the people who elected her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trekant</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10755</link>
		<dc:creator>Trekant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10755</guid>
		<description>Well written.  I've linked to this outrageous story on my blog.  There are a couple of Wiesel books I've been meaning to read.  Now seems like the time to purchase them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written.  I&#8217;ve linked to this outrageous story on my blog.  There are a couple of Wiesel books I&#8217;ve been meaning to read.  Now seems like the time to purchase them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Devereaux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10749</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Devereaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10749</guid>
		<description>Ymarsaker, you're right.  That was glib of me.  They do have principles - but they seem to violate them upon any expediency.  It must be noted that they're hardly alone in this: the positions of the Left and Right on Kenneth Starr's prosecution of Clinton for lying about sex to a grand jury have been reversed exactly 180 degrees for Fitzgerald's prosecution of Scooter Libby.  Principle requires that what's good for the goose is good for the gander.  But we don't see enough of that anywhere.  Political expediency is the name of the game.

I'd like to clarify my above post (#8).  I'm not a fan of national flag desecration. I'd never do it.  But once you admit to its use, then by principle you can't start refusing it for this nation or that nation.  Also, I was speaking with religious tolerance when I advocated - and I am serious - removing 'Allah' script from the flags before protesting against theocracy.  If you can protest by defacing any national flag, but you can't carefully cut a religious symbol from a flag, what are we left with?  I am quite serious too, that once 'Allah' has been - with great care - removed from the flags, as a nod to religious sensibilities, then there is no remaining argument against burning or stomping on their flags, as students at that university would burn and stomp on our own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ymarsaker, you&#8217;re right.  That was glib of me.  They do have principles - but they seem to violate them upon any expediency.  It must be noted that they&#8217;re hardly alone in this: the positions of the Left and Right on Kenneth Starr&#8217;s prosecution of Clinton for lying about sex to a grand jury have been reversed exactly 180 degrees for Fitzgerald&#8217;s prosecution of Scooter Libby.  Principle requires that what&#8217;s good for the goose is good for the gander.  But we don&#8217;t see enough of that anywhere.  Political expediency is the name of the game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to clarify my above post (#8).  I&#8217;m not a fan of national flag desecration. I&#8217;d never do it.  But once you admit to its use, then by principle you can&#8217;t start refusing it for this nation or that nation.  Also, I was speaking with religious tolerance when I advocated - and I am serious - removing &#8216;Allah&#8217; script from the flags before protesting against theocracy.  If you can protest by defacing any national flag, but you can&#8217;t carefully cut a religious symbol from a flag, what are we left with?  I am quite serious too, that once &#8216;Allah&#8217; has been - with great care - removed from the flags, as a nod to religious sensibilities, then there is no remaining argument against burning or stomping on their flags, as students at that university would burn and stomp on our own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/02/12/san-francisco-has-bigger-scandals-than-a-debauched-mayor/#comment-10757</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1339#comment-10757</guid>
		<description>Actually their principle seems quite simple. Hate and undermine America, the power and prestige of America. That's it. Anything that is good for America, must be blown up. Anything that is bad for America, must be promoted. Seems simple enough of a philosophy for the Left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually their principle seems quite simple. Hate and undermine America, the power and prestige of America. That&#8217;s it. Anything that is good for America, must be blown up. Anything that is bad for America, must be promoted. Seems simple enough of a philosophy for the Left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
