him so wicked and cruel for watch zionist media control tv show and get so stupid every day.

him say him christian but never read him bible.

him christ him teach forgiving. so many usa ameriki people say i am christian but not christian-just fake it for lie and love money and the torture. also the new refrigerator and 7-11 cheese nachos.

for this all ameriki society destroy and the ameriki child girl she taking shot for destroy the reproduction organs. and usa government this forcing.

Bush’s stonewall technique, has a curious strength. The harder you hit the stonewall, the more pain the wall inflicts on you. The light B slaps the Democrats have been giving Bush is nothing to stone, even though over time weather, wind, and water slaps will wear stone away even if stone will not recognize this or try to stop it. For Bush’s fighting technique to truly shine, the stonewall must be hit by its enemies with the power of a tsunami. Only then will stone show its power. Otherwise, it mostly acts inert and dead.

I am disappointed with Bush, I keep thinking he must have a strategy. It seems like now is the time to strike hard against the Congress, his little press conferences are only encouraging them. A lot of Americans are mad that the Democrats want to cut and run, we’d be happy to turn our anger on the Congress.

Second, the main point of your effort here–splendidly accomplished–is to show the 1984-ish character of public discourse coming from the Left. I have been noticing the same for some time. It is prima facia evidence that Orwell, as a man of the left, had first hand, inside knowledge of the kind of people and ideology he was talking about. The trajectory of socialism/communism and its modern variants is as unmistakable as its techniques are recognizable–mainly saying and doing anything to put forward the agenda, summed up in modern parlance in the pop phrase, “are you going to believe me, or your own lying eyes?

That’s it Book, Nancy can only combine two contradictory positions? Come on, give me a break here. Everyone knows a true master can combine at least 5 contradictory ideas into one consistent whole without even thinking about it. Nancy’s a pure amateur obviously.

I looked up the word “truck” in Websters and found nothing that would work in your sentance.

I can’t remember, but I seem to get a sense that I’ve heard this before in the south. It does seem to be misleading, though from Book’s link it usually just means “traffic”. Truck also being a vehicle, that might be easier to remember.

It seemed to have combined the two. A wheel that barters goods (commerce)… by transfering them.