<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wonderful Wal-Mart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12956</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12956</guid>
		<description>Ymarsakar,

The thing is Ymarsakar, I quite agree with you that this really is a weird position for a conservative to take.  Most conservatives would agree that market forces should be the sole determining factor in how a business should operate, i.e. whether or not the market can support certain business enterprises.

However, this is one of the areas where I am on the liberal end of the spectrum.  My political philosophy is more akin to the Harry Truman and Scoop Jackson variety, which is very strong on defense but fairly liberal on the domestics.  I just can't in good conscience advocate a business practice that would force a man to work 60 to 70 hour weeks just to keep his head afloat at minimum wage.  There's just got to be a better way of doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ymarsakar,</p>
<p>The thing is Ymarsakar, I quite agree with you that this really is a weird position for a conservative to take.  Most conservatives would agree that market forces should be the sole determining factor in how a business should operate, i.e. whether or not the market can support certain business enterprises.</p>
<p>However, this is one of the areas where I am on the liberal end of the spectrum.  My political philosophy is more akin to the Harry Truman and Scoop Jackson variety, which is very strong on defense but fairly liberal on the domestics.  I just can&#8217;t in good conscience advocate a business practice that would force a man to work 60 to 70 hour weeks just to keep his head afloat at minimum wage.  There&#8217;s just got to be a better way of doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12955</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12955</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;My other objection to Wal-Mart is that they don’t pay their workers a living wage. Employees for a mom&#38;pop store ain’t exactly getting money hoisted on them either, but many Wal-Mart workers, for a long time, didn’t even have the option of having health benefits (I understand they offer some benefits now.) Look, you can barely live off the income if you worked at Wal-Mart if you are just supporting yourself.&lt;/b&gt;

I had this thought before, so I might as well say it now, Thomas. That this is a weird position for a conservative to hold. About a living wage. Independent of whether anything above a minimum wage should even be a living wage, why focus on raising the wage, a union cause, instead of having more jobs, not a union cause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>My other objection to Wal-Mart is that they don’t pay their workers a living wage. Employees for a mom&amp;pop store ain’t exactly getting money hoisted on them either, but many Wal-Mart workers, for a long time, didn’t even have the option of having health benefits (I understand they offer some benefits now.) Look, you can barely live off the income if you worked at Wal-Mart if you are just supporting yourself.</b></p>
<p>I had this thought before, so I might as well say it now, Thomas. That this is a weird position for a conservative to hold. About a living wage. Independent of whether anything above a minimum wage should even be a living wage, why focus on raising the wage, a union cause, instead of having more jobs, not a union cause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SGT Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12957</link>
		<dc:creator>SGT Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12957</guid>
		<description>Just my two cents;
Being a military type, I have a PX and Commissary available to me.  My family uses Wal-Mart for mid-level goods, the PX/commissary for high end items (no sales tax and good prices on "brand" names) and when I just need a couple things I walk three blocks to the Mom &#38; Pop grocer.  The only people that went out of business when Wal-Mart came to town where I live were not making it anyway (one grocer with awful conditions and very bad help and an overpriced pharmacy).  Notably, there were other businesses that survived in the same niche as those that failed.  And as to the "living wage" argument; a friend of mine worked for Wal-Mart for several years.  She earned a very nice wage, could afford health insurance, and was doing good.  After her divorce she moved; her next jobs in manufacturing, for an "enlightened" corporation, and in government all netted her less disposable income and considerably worse health care.  At the "enlightened" job she was earning 30% more pre-tax than as an assistant manager at Wal-mart.  After health care, the union dues, and several other deductions, her monthly take home pay was almost 15% lower.  Oh, and when they let her go, the cost for COBRA coverage was nearly $1200 a month - for $50 copays and $25 prescriptions.  She's working for Medicare, of all places, now.  She wishes she'd stayed with Wal-mart; the pay was similar and the customers less confrontational.

SGT Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just my two cents;<br />
Being a military type, I have a PX and Commissary available to me.  My family uses Wal-Mart for mid-level goods, the PX/commissary for high end items (no sales tax and good prices on &#8220;brand&#8221; names) and when I just need a couple things I walk three blocks to the Mom &amp; Pop grocer.  The only people that went out of business when Wal-Mart came to town where I live were not making it anyway (one grocer with awful conditions and very bad help and an overpriced pharmacy).  Notably, there were other businesses that survived in the same niche as those that failed.  And as to the &#8220;living wage&#8221; argument; a friend of mine worked for Wal-Mart for several years.  She earned a very nice wage, could afford health insurance, and was doing good.  After her divorce she moved; her next jobs in manufacturing, for an &#8220;enlightened&#8221; corporation, and in government all netted her less disposable income and considerably worse health care.  At the &#8220;enlightened&#8221; job she was earning 30% more pre-tax than as an assistant manager at Wal-mart.  After health care, the union dues, and several other deductions, her monthly take home pay was almost 15% lower.  Oh, and when they let her go, the cost for COBRA coverage was nearly $1200 a month - for $50 copays and $25 prescriptions.  She&#8217;s working for Medicare, of all places, now.  She wishes she&#8217;d stayed with Wal-mart; the pay was similar and the customers less confrontational.</p>
<p>SGT Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12958</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12958</guid>
		<description>Walmart has (I think) put a lot of the small stores of out business in my small town.  But I never shopped at the small stores anyway; they were closed when I left work.

I do hate the crowds at Walmart, but I also hate looking for downtown parking.  Like DQ, I try to shop at 8 a.m. and patronize the very few stores open at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walmart has (I think) put a lot of the small stores of out business in my small town.  But I never shopped at the small stores anyway; they were closed when I left work.</p>
<p>I do hate the crowds at Walmart, but I also hate looking for downtown parking.  Like DQ, I try to shop at 8 a.m. and patronize the very few stores open at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Kildow</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12959</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Kildow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12959</guid>
		<description>Most liberals hate Walmart out of snobbery, as several of these posts have pointed out.  Most conservatives are ambivalent about Walmart for the same reason we are uneasy about the bequest of modernity in general.  Traditions, habits, customs, and folkways were all swept away in the French Revolution.  Our own revolution was more modest and measured, being Anglo-Saxon and all, but the "acids of modernity", having been baked into the cake as it were, have inexorably continued undercutting our tradtiions as well. "Progressive" and "old-fashioned" are antonyms, and in the modern world, it is embarrassing to be a traditional Christian, to be patriotic, to try to hold onto traditional morality, even to be Southern.  Walmart is associated with all these middle American values that are hopelessly out of step with modern, and now postmodern cynicism and irony, while at the same time leading the revolution in retailing which has undercut traditonal mom and pop stores. (The former is why French-owned Target is favored by liberals--Target supports the "arts" and "education" while driving away the Salvation Army and the Marines Toys for Tots tables from their stores; the latter is why they loathe it).

 What logically follows from the imperative of the modern scientific view of the world, ie, conquering nature for the relief of man's estate--that if a thing can be done, it will be done--applies largely to economics as well.  The inexorable march toward ever more sophistication in business and finance will continue apace, almost as if beyond our control, very much the way cutting edge biology threatens the very definition of the human. All of these are part of what make living in the modern world a blessing; but our knowledge gives blessings with one hand, and harms us with what it takes away with the other.  The shift in the retail business model led by Walmart is just one aspect of the continuous evolution of the economic part of modernity.

BTW, I go to Walmart for things that are likely to be a lot lower in price, or that are out of stock elsewhere.  I am an infrequent shopper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most liberals hate Walmart out of snobbery, as several of these posts have pointed out.  Most conservatives are ambivalent about Walmart for the same reason we are uneasy about the bequest of modernity in general.  Traditions, habits, customs, and folkways were all swept away in the French Revolution.  Our own revolution was more modest and measured, being Anglo-Saxon and all, but the &#8220;acids of modernity&#8221;, having been baked into the cake as it were, have inexorably continued undercutting our tradtiions as well. &#8220;Progressive&#8221; and &#8220;old-fashioned&#8221; are antonyms, and in the modern world, it is embarrassing to be a traditional Christian, to be patriotic, to try to hold onto traditional morality, even to be Southern.  Walmart is associated with all these middle American values that are hopelessly out of step with modern, and now postmodern cynicism and irony, while at the same time leading the revolution in retailing which has undercut traditonal mom and pop stores. (The former is why French-owned Target is favored by liberals&#8211;Target supports the &#8220;arts&#8221; and &#8220;education&#8221; while driving away the Salvation Army and the Marines Toys for Tots tables from their stores; the latter is why they loathe it).</p>
<p> What logically follows from the imperative of the modern scientific view of the world, ie, conquering nature for the relief of man&#8217;s estate&#8211;that if a thing can be done, it will be done&#8211;applies largely to economics as well.  The inexorable march toward ever more sophistication in business and finance will continue apace, almost as if beyond our control, very much the way cutting edge biology threatens the very definition of the human. All of these are part of what make living in the modern world a blessing; but our knowledge gives blessings with one hand, and harms us with what it takes away with the other.  The shift in the retail business model led by Walmart is just one aspect of the continuous evolution of the economic part of modernity.</p>
<p>BTW, I go to Walmart for things that are likely to be a lot lower in price, or that are out of stock elsewhere.  I am an infrequent shopper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12962</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C. Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12962</guid>
		<description>Target has better stuff. Go there more than Walmart. I do use the photo department, as they use Fuji materials. But other places do now, such as Wallgreens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Target has better stuff. Go there more than Walmart. I do use the photo department, as they use Fuji materials. But other places do now, such as Wallgreens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marguerite</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12961</link>
		<dc:creator>Marguerite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12961</guid>
		<description>Forgot to say that I don't have a Walmart anywhere near me because the neighbors in the area decided to fight it and won.  Privately, they didn't want 'those kind' of people coming into the neighborhood in droves, but it was convenient to say publicly that traffic would depress property values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to say that I don&#8217;t have a Walmart anywhere near me because the neighbors in the area decided to fight it and won.  Privately, they didn&#8217;t want &#8216;those kind&#8217; of people coming into the neighborhood in droves, but it was convenient to say publicly that traffic would depress property values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marguerite</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12960</link>
		<dc:creator>Marguerite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12960</guid>
		<description>I haven't read all the posts on this topic - so this may have already been covered. My thought is that a business exists to provide a good or service to be sold at a profit to the owner. It does not exist to provide a 'living wage' or to provide health insurance or day-care.  In a similar vein, there are people who want to guilt me to buy super-expensive shade grown coffee beans to subsidize a life-style when all I want is coffee that tastes good. All I expect a business to do is provide the goods or service I need.  Walmart does this and millions upon millions of feet beat a path to their door - for goods, services, and employment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read all the posts on this topic - so this may have already been covered. My thought is that a business exists to provide a good or service to be sold at a profit to the owner. It does not exist to provide a &#8216;living wage&#8217; or to provide health insurance or day-care.  In a similar vein, there are people who want to guilt me to buy super-expensive shade grown coffee beans to subsidize a life-style when all I want is coffee that tastes good. All I expect a business to do is provide the goods or service I need.  Walmart does this and millions upon millions of feet beat a path to their door - for goods, services, and employment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12966</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12966</guid>
		<description>I just think in general Americans don't like being somewhere, where people are in their private space. It's different from Europeans, because Europeans and Japanese live in high density regions. Not exactly urban regions, but just high density, really compact demographics and areas.

It's sort of similar to how someone who has always lived underground or indoors, can have agoraphobia. But it is reversed, because space was plentiful in America, people and families have grown up throughout the generations expecting &lt;I&gt;space&lt;/i&gt;. And if you don't get your space, you have this tingling mental discontent going on.

This also has big problems when Americans interact with different cultures, such as the Arabs, who will get into your personal space and start yelling in your face, for almost no reason at all. As a negotiations ploy even. It is also the cause of the friction between white cultures and the black culture here in the US. There is a strain amongst blacks to be confrontational, to get in someone's face, and have it out via an argument. Whereas Anglo-Saxon culture tends to be more reserved, if only because of the duello code back some centuries ago. America still had the Code Duello even after Europe banned it, just so ya know. In fact, one of the Founding Fathers got killed in a duel. A big reason to be polite and reserved when facing someone you dislike or find disagreeable. Not present in certain segments of black families, because... of some unknown variables.

&lt;B&gt;I shop at Wal-Mart between 7 &#38; 8 a.m.&lt;/b&gt;

That's one way to avoid the crowds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just think in general Americans don&#8217;t like being somewhere, where people are in their private space. It&#8217;s different from Europeans, because Europeans and Japanese live in high density regions. Not exactly urban regions, but just high density, really compact demographics and areas.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of similar to how someone who has always lived underground or indoors, can have agoraphobia. But it is reversed, because space was plentiful in America, people and families have grown up throughout the generations expecting <i>space</i>. And if you don&#8217;t get your space, you have this tingling mental discontent going on.</p>
<p>This also has big problems when Americans interact with different cultures, such as the Arabs, who will get into your personal space and start yelling in your face, for almost no reason at all. As a negotiations ploy even. It is also the cause of the friction between white cultures and the black culture here in the US. There is a strain amongst blacks to be confrontational, to get in someone&#8217;s face, and have it out via an argument. Whereas Anglo-Saxon culture tends to be more reserved, if only because of the duello code back some centuries ago. America still had the Code Duello even after Europe banned it, just so ya know. In fact, one of the Founding Fathers got killed in a duel. A big reason to be polite and reserved when facing someone you dislike or find disagreeable. Not present in certain segments of black families, because&#8230; of some unknown variables.</p>
<p><b>I shop at Wal-Mart between 7 &amp; 8 a.m.</b></p>
<p>That&#8217;s one way to avoid the crowds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldflyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/04/21/wonderful-wal-mart/#comment-12965</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1571#comment-12965</guid>
		<description>This thread is interesting on several levels.  I have just read comments about Walmart that have been disproven over and over as pure propaganda.  Are they still believed?  Or do people echo them in hopes that other readers are ignorant?

Walmart is neither good nor bad. It is not part of a morality play.

Well maybe it is part of a larger world-wide morality play.   I worked off and on in England in the period just before super-markets came into vogue.  After a hiatus I returned to England and Supermarkets were very popular.  Many people profess to hate them; but people crowd into them for their own particular reasons. Just like Walmart, English supermarkets serve a purpose for many people.  Just as in the U.S. many people regret the passing of the familiar; but, they adapt to change.

I really love the one about Walmart forcing manufacturer's to leave the states and go to China.  I did not buy my Buick in Walmart; but it was not manufactured in the U.S either. My previous car was built in Mexico. But, my Pick-em-up truck with the Japanese name was built in the U.S.  I suggest anyone who believes that it is Walmart forcing manufacturering overseas might take a closer look at the merchandise they are buying in other outlets.

It is ridiculous to say that Walmart does not offer good merchandise. No they do not offer designer clothes, nor do they offer decent fly-fishing equipment.  But, for the most part they offer the same popular brands as any other outlet.  They have the same brands of tooth paste; the same brands of small appliances.  I can pick up distilled water for about half the price I can at a chain or specialty supermarket--and I use quite a bit of distilled water.

If price were no consideration, I might never enter a Walmart, because I also really hate to be to be crowded or jostled. I love to feel that I am the focus of attention of a knowledgeable sales person. I do enjoy when the cashier at the local hardware tells me "Thanks for stopping in, Hon". (But, that may only resonate after your 70th birthday).  If special merchandise or specialty service is the goal I don't head for WM now. On the other hand, price considerations aside, I know that I can buy a wide range of ordinary necessities with one stop.

I do not consider WM evil; I consider them useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thread is interesting on several levels.  I have just read comments about Walmart that have been disproven over and over as pure propaganda.  Are they still believed?  Or do people echo them in hopes that other readers are ignorant?</p>
<p>Walmart is neither good nor bad. It is not part of a morality play.</p>
<p>Well maybe it is part of a larger world-wide morality play.   I worked off and on in England in the period just before super-markets came into vogue.  After a hiatus I returned to England and Supermarkets were very popular.  Many people profess to hate them; but people crowd into them for their own particular reasons. Just like Walmart, English supermarkets serve a purpose for many people.  Just as in the U.S. many people regret the passing of the familiar; but, they adapt to change.</p>
<p>I really love the one about Walmart forcing manufacturer&#8217;s to leave the states and go to China.  I did not buy my Buick in Walmart; but it was not manufactured in the U.S either. My previous car was built in Mexico. But, my Pick-em-up truck with the Japanese name was built in the U.S.  I suggest anyone who believes that it is Walmart forcing manufacturering overseas might take a closer look at the merchandise they are buying in other outlets.</p>
<p>It is ridiculous to say that Walmart does not offer good merchandise. No they do not offer designer clothes, nor do they offer decent fly-fishing equipment.  But, for the most part they offer the same popular brands as any other outlet.  They have the same brands of tooth paste; the same brands of small appliances.  I can pick up distilled water for about half the price I can at a chain or specialty supermarket&#8211;and I use quite a bit of distilled water.</p>
<p>If price were no consideration, I might never enter a Walmart, because I also really hate to be to be crowded or jostled. I love to feel that I am the focus of attention of a knowledgeable sales person. I do enjoy when the cashier at the local hardware tells me &#8220;Thanks for stopping in, Hon&#8221;. (But, that may only resonate after your 70th birthday).  If special merchandise or specialty service is the goal I don&#8217;t head for WM now. On the other hand, price considerations aside, I know that I can buy a wide range of ordinary necessities with one stop.</p>
<p>I do not consider WM evil; I consider them useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
