<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can anyone explain the stock market to me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13609</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13609</guid>
		<description>Danny and DQ, I agree. Completely.  Let me repeat DQ's phrase again:

"As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America."

Where did the can-do spirit go?  Where did the optimism go?  We should admit the problems that exist, sure, but there is a quality of endless complaining and whining, fear-mongering and arguing and quibbling for meaningless tiny advantages... all things that we should reject.  We're a Show-Me nation.  A can-do nation. We see a problem, we fix it, breaking a few eggs along the way, but then we fix those too, eventually.  But we focus on getting the damn job done, and done well and proudly.  That is, we used to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny and DQ, I agree. Completely.  Let me repeat DQ&#8217;s phrase again:</p>
<p>&#8220;As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America.&#8221;</p>
<p>Where did the can-do spirit go?  Where did the optimism go?  We should admit the problems that exist, sure, but there is a quality of endless complaining and whining, fear-mongering and arguing and quibbling for meaningless tiny advantages&#8230; all things that we should reject.  We&#8217;re a Show-Me nation.  A can-do nation. We see a problem, we fix it, breaking a few eggs along the way, but then we fix those too, eventually.  But we focus on getting the damn job done, and done well and proudly.  That is, we used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13610</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13610</guid>
		<description>"As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America."

- So right, DQ. This should be any Republican candidate's campaign slogan.

As several pundits have noted, bold headlines on the stockmarket's fall, barely a few lines devoted to the rebound. The MSM has simply become a propaganda outlet for the Left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America.&#8221;</p>
<p>- So right, DQ. This should be any Republican candidate&#8217;s campaign slogan.</p>
<p>As several pundits have noted, bold headlines on the stockmarket&#8217;s fall, barely a few lines devoted to the rebound. The MSM has simply become a propaganda outlet for the Left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13611</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 12:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13611</guid>
		<description>Consider today's drudge headline:

"The Chinese government has begun a concerted campaign of economic threats against the United States, hinting that it may liquidate its vast holding of US treasuries if Washington imposes trade sanctions to force a yuan revaluation." ...

"Beijing may use its $1.33 trillion (£658bn) of foreign reserves as a political weapon to counter pressure from the US Congress."... "Beijing had the power to set off a dollar collapse if it choose to do so." ... "foreign control over 44pc of the US national debt had left America acutely vulnerable."

In #14, Oldflyer comments, "people all over the world own our national debt. When I was a kid I owned part of it in the form of War Bonds.".  I agree with Oldflyer that that would not be a problem in general.  However, when other governments have accumulated vast dollar reserves AND have direct control over a large portion of the national debt - when it is not individuals but unfriendly governments themselves - then we have a national security risk.  I think the scope of this risk makes uncontrolled illegal immigration on our southern borders look as dangerous as a mosquito.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider today&#8217;s drudge headline:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Chinese government has begun a concerted campaign of economic threats against the United States, hinting that it may liquidate its vast holding of US treasuries if Washington imposes trade sanctions to force a yuan revaluation.&#8221; &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Beijing may use its $1.33 trillion (£658bn) of foreign reserves as a political weapon to counter pressure from the US Congress.&#8221;&#8230; &#8220;Beijing had the power to set off a dollar collapse if it choose to do so.&#8221; &#8230; &#8220;foreign control over 44pc of the US national debt had left America acutely vulnerable.&#8221;</p>
<p>In #14, Oldflyer comments, &#8220;people all over the world own our national debt. When I was a kid I owned part of it in the form of War Bonds.&#8221;.  I agree with Oldflyer that that would not be a problem in general.  However, when other governments have accumulated vast dollar reserves AND have direct control over a large portion of the national debt - when it is not individuals but unfriendly governments themselves - then we have a national security risk.  I think the scope of this risk makes uncontrolled illegal immigration on our southern borders look as dangerous as a mosquito.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13612</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13612</guid>
		<description>International Money markets also produce results. Look at George Soros. Not as popular as the stock market though. More restricted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International Money markets also produce results. Look at George Soros. Not as popular as the stock market though. More restricted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13613</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13613</guid>
		<description>Stock market analysts are a bit like Darwinists - they look at stuff after it's happened and then come up with a story to explain why....it can be hilarious if you attempt to rationalize all the stories.

But, if history means anything at all, then the safest place for your money, *in the long term*, is the U.S. stock market. Plainly, diversification is good because none of us knows the future.  But putting the money in the mattress because all those nasty hedge funds are manipulating the market for their own ends will make you poor and bitter.  While the evidence is really clear that investing in the American economy will make you wealthier, and (presumably) happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stock market analysts are a bit like Darwinists - they look at stuff after it&#8217;s happened and then come up with a story to explain why&#8230;.it can be hilarious if you attempt to rationalize all the stories.</p>
<p>But, if history means anything at all, then the safest place for your money, *in the long term*, is the U.S. stock market. Plainly, diversification is good because none of us knows the future.  But putting the money in the mattress because all those nasty hedge funds are manipulating the market for their own ends will make you poor and bitter.  While the evidence is really clear that investing in the American economy will make you wealthier, and (presumably) happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13614</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13614</guid>
		<description>The AP's propaganda is never useless. Weak perhaps, but not useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP&#8217;s propaganda is never useless. Weak perhaps, but not useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13615</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13615</guid>
		<description>Just in case we needed an example, under the heading "Wall Street Bounces on Fed Decision" on Yahoo Finance right now is an AP story that begins: "Wall Street searched for direction Tuesday after the Federal Reserve disappointed investors by maintaining inflation fighting as its highest priority although credit has become tighter for consumers and businesses."  Apparently, all those "disappointed investors" ran out and bought stocks, causing the market to bounce.

What really happened is that the initial reaction was negative (which the story picked up), but the market then did bounce, which the headline writer (who came along later), picked up.  Useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case we needed an example, under the heading &#8220;Wall Street Bounces on Fed Decision&#8221; on Yahoo Finance right now is an AP story that begins: &#8220;Wall Street searched for direction Tuesday after the Federal Reserve disappointed investors by maintaining inflation fighting as its highest priority although credit has become tighter for consumers and businesses.&#8221;  Apparently, all those &#8220;disappointed investors&#8221; ran out and bought stocks, causing the market to bounce.</p>
<p>What really happened is that the initial reaction was negative (which the story picked up), but the market then did bounce, which the headline writer (who came along later), picked up.  Useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13616</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13616</guid>
		<description>Hedge funds and other large funds drive the market. They make money when stocks, commodities, etc go up or down by either going long or selling short. Going long is "buying low, selling high". Going short (through options) is "selling high then buying low".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedge funds and other large funds drive the market. They make money when stocks, commodities, etc go up or down by either going long or selling short. Going long is &#8220;buying low, selling high&#8221;. Going short (through options) is &#8220;selling high then buying low&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13617</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13617</guid>
		<description>One other thought about Trimegistus' comment.  Oil is at a record high and there are only one or two times in the last 50 years that it's been a larger part of the cost of living.  I'm tired of hearing the argument that, yes, it's the highest it's ever been in price, but if you control for inflation, it's only the second highest it's ever been.  Are we really reduced to saying that just because something is not the absolute worst it has ever been, it's just fine (or, in Trimegistus' word, not really a danger sign at all)?  Whatever happened to striving for our economy (and our life, and our country) to be the best it has ever been?  If ever there was a sure sign of America's decline, it is the drumbeat from it's strongest supporters that things are not all that bad.  Nobody, but nobody, is saying that things are the best they have ever been or that they ever will be as good as they were.  As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thought about Trimegistus&#8217; comment.  Oil is at a record high and there are only one or two times in the last 50 years that it&#8217;s been a larger part of the cost of living.  I&#8217;m tired of hearing the argument that, yes, it&#8217;s the highest it&#8217;s ever been in price, but if you control for inflation, it&#8217;s only the second highest it&#8217;s ever been.  Are we really reduced to saying that just because something is not the absolute worst it has ever been, it&#8217;s just fine (or, in Trimegistus&#8217; word, not really a danger sign at all)?  Whatever happened to striving for our economy (and our life, and our country) to be the best it has ever been?  If ever there was a sure sign of America&#8217;s decline, it is the drumbeat from it&#8217;s strongest supporters that things are not all that bad.  Nobody, but nobody, is saying that things are the best they have ever been or that they ever will be as good as they were.  As much as anything else, it is this death of optimism that is killing America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/06/can-anyone-explain-the-stock-market-to-me/#comment-13618</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1636#comment-13618</guid>
		<description>Here's a really interesting piece my brother sent that relates to what we're talking about.  First, a quote from near the end:

"Recent events show that financial innovations meant to distribute risk can end up multiplying it instead, in ways neither regulators nor investors fully understand. Mr. Grantham, the Boston money manager, says his portfolios are behaving in ways he hadn't expected.

"Fed officials believe that even if their policies led to housing and debt bubbles, the strength of the overall economy shows that the policy was, on balance, the right one. Of course, that assumes the current problems don't culminate in a recession."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118643226865289581.html?mod=djemITP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a really interesting piece my brother sent that relates to what we&#8217;re talking about.  First, a quote from near the end:</p>
<p>&#8220;Recent events show that financial innovations meant to distribute risk can end up multiplying it instead, in ways neither regulators nor investors fully understand. Mr. Grantham, the Boston money manager, says his portfolios are behaving in ways he hadn&#8217;t expected.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fed officials believe that even if their policies led to housing and debt bubbles, the strength of the overall economy shows that the policy was, on balance, the right one. Of course, that assumes the current problems don&#8217;t culminate in a recession.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118643226865289581.html?mod=djemITP" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118643226865289581.html?mod=djemITP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
