<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards: Hypocrite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14494</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14494</guid>
		<description>Aristocrats are too important ot sacrifice for peons, Book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aristocrats are too important ot sacrifice for peons, Book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14496</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14496</guid>
		<description>TTJ, do you understand what it means to be a hypocrite?  The "money grubbing" Republicans, Conservatives, Libertarians, etc., however, are not advocating intrusive economic government plans that will hit the middle class hard, while leaving him untouched.  I think it's great that he moved up from poverty.  I'd like him to get his hands off my economics so that others have the same chance.  Edwards talks the talk of a populist, but he lives ostentatiously like a plutocrat.  He is an unappealing figure in that he demands sacrifices of others that he's clearly not willing to make himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TTJ, do you understand what it means to be a hypocrite?  The &#8220;money grubbing&#8221; Republicans, Conservatives, Libertarians, etc., however, are not advocating intrusive economic government plans that will hit the middle class hard, while leaving him untouched.  I think it&#8217;s great that he moved up from poverty.  I&#8217;d like him to get his hands off my economics so that others have the same chance.  Edwards talks the talk of a populist, but he lives ostentatiously like a plutocrat.  He is an unappealing figure in that he demands sacrifices of others that he&#8217;s clearly not willing to make himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ttj</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14493</link>
		<dc:creator>ttj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14493</guid>
		<description>It looks like you guys here are having a hard time convincing yourself of what you are trying to say. What is Edwards supposed to do, live in a shack? There are hundreds, maybe thousands, of Republicans who have houses and properties that big or bigger...and have many more cars.  It's clear he personally knows plenty about poverty. Have you, by the way, seen the house he grew up in? It was tiny. Does he have to move back into that house just to satisfy people that he has firsthand knowledge of what he is saying? That is rather stupid. Until all the MONEY GRUBBING Republicans, Conservatives, Libertarians and Democratic Washington insiders shilling for corporate interests sell off all they own and take a vow of poverty, NOBODY can call John Edwards a hypocrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you guys here are having a hard time convincing yourself of what you are trying to say. What is Edwards supposed to do, live in a shack? There are hundreds, maybe thousands, of Republicans who have houses and properties that big or bigger&#8230;and have many more cars.  It&#8217;s clear he personally knows plenty about poverty. Have you, by the way, seen the house he grew up in? It was tiny. Does he have to move back into that house just to satisfy people that he has firsthand knowledge of what he is saying? That is rather stupid. Until all the MONEY GRUBBING Republicans, Conservatives, Libertarians and Democratic Washington insiders shilling for corporate interests sell off all they own and take a vow of poverty, NOBODY can call John Edwards a hypocrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14471</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14471</guid>
		<description>Helen, I find myself in complete agreement with you: Edwards does indeed fit the mold for a democrat.  Perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen, I find myself in complete agreement with you: Edwards does indeed fit the mold for a democrat.  Perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14472</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14472</guid>
		<description>On another issue, this isn't the chickenhawk dance either. In that, Edwards doesn't need to be poor to talk to the poor or about the poor or anything else concerning the poor. Hypocrisy is often incorrectly used for partisan political gains, through attacking a person's credibility by saying he doesn't do what he says should be done. Doesn't walk the walk, but talks the talk, in essence. This is incorrect because hypocrisy is not about always doing what want to be doing. Hypocrisy is espousing a belief that you don't believe in, rather than espousing a belief that you just happen to fail in adhering to because of human flaws.

Jesse Jackson for example doesn't believe in race equality or anything else he says. Nor do most propagandists, except the true believer propagandists, even though it is debatable whether a propagandist that believes in their own propaganda is really a propagandist.

If Edwards simply said that only poor people, unlike him, should do so and so, and Edwards himself didn't do what he recommended, then Edwards wouldn't be a hypocrite. However, if Edwards recommended that people do X and Y because X and Y should be done by everyone since it benefits everyone, and doesn't himself do such things, then he obviously doesn't believe that his lies apply to himself.

Maybe he made a mistake. That is possible. Unlikely, but possible. However, whatever mistakes Edwards and his people make, it is going to be their responsibility to explain, not ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another issue, this isn&#8217;t the chickenhawk dance either. In that, Edwards doesn&#8217;t need to be poor to talk to the poor or about the poor or anything else concerning the poor. Hypocrisy is often incorrectly used for partisan political gains, through attacking a person&#8217;s credibility by saying he doesn&#8217;t do what he says should be done. Doesn&#8217;t walk the walk, but talks the talk, in essence. This is incorrect because hypocrisy is not about always doing what want to be doing. Hypocrisy is espousing a belief that you don&#8217;t believe in, rather than espousing a belief that you just happen to fail in adhering to because of human flaws.</p>
<p>Jesse Jackson for example doesn&#8217;t believe in race equality or anything else he says. Nor do most propagandists, except the true believer propagandists, even though it is debatable whether a propagandist that believes in their own propaganda is really a propagandist.</p>
<p>If Edwards simply said that only poor people, unlike him, should do so and so, and Edwards himself didn&#8217;t do what he recommended, then Edwards wouldn&#8217;t be a hypocrite. However, if Edwards recommended that people do X and Y because X and Y should be done by everyone since it benefits everyone, and doesn&#8217;t himself do such things, then he obviously doesn&#8217;t believe that his lies apply to himself.</p>
<p>Maybe he made a mistake. That is possible. Unlikely, but possible. However, whatever mistakes Edwards and his people make, it is going to be their responsibility to explain, not ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14473</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14473</guid>
		<description>To be clear, if Edwards believes that there are two Americans, one America in which stands the people in need of his help as the educated and wealthy aristocrat and a second America in which Edwards and Company resides in as the superior force in events, then no, Edwards would not be a hypocrite. Then if he says you all should do so and so, he isn't talking about himself, cause he isn't part of your side of America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, if Edwards believes that there are two Americans, one America in which stands the people in need of his help as the educated and wealthy aristocrat and a second America in which Edwards and Company resides in as the superior force in events, then no, Edwards would not be a hypocrite. Then if he says you all should do so and so, he isn&#8217;t talking about himself, cause he isn&#8217;t part of your side of America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14474</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14474</guid>
		<description>You could not have said it any more clearly, YM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could not have said it any more clearly, YM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14476</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14476</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;So why is Edwards a hypocrite?&lt;/b&gt;

Because he doesn't believe in the things that he say he believes in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>So why is Edwards a hypocrite?</b></p>
<p>Because he doesn&#8217;t believe in the things that he say he believes in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14475</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14475</guid>
		<description>Interesting perspective - our "leaders" are "better than us"...wealthier and more educated...(a huge assumption) so, therefore, it is OK if people like the Kennedys, Kerrys, and Edwards lecture to us riff-raff how we need to run our lives and doff our hat to them in the process.

I've heard that world view expressed many times before, mostly by aristocrat wannabees and mostly in Europe. Not in America, though. I would like to think that real Americans will never ever accept assessing rights and privileges according to political, educational or economic class as  the natural order of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting perspective - our &#8220;leaders&#8221; are &#8220;better than us&#8221;&#8230;wealthier and more educated&#8230;(a huge assumption) so, therefore, it is OK if people like the Kennedys, Kerrys, and Edwards lecture to us riff-raff how we need to run our lives and doff our hat to them in the process.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard that world view expressed many times before, mostly by aristocrat wannabees and mostly in Europe. Not in America, though. I would like to think that real Americans will never ever accept assessing rights and privileges according to political, educational or economic class as  the natural order of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: helenl</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/08/31/john-edwards-hypocrite/#comment-14477</link>
		<dc:creator>helenl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1762#comment-14477</guid>
		<description>I think you are right about Craig.  He is better off out of the public eye for a bit.  Take a look at this: http://phoebekate.com/2007/09/01/potty-time-with-senator-craig/

Edwards, however, fits the mold for a Democrat.  Leaders are typically richer and more educated than the masses who vote for them.  Republicans tend to vote for their equals (as far as money and power are concerned, not human worth). So Edwards concern for the poor is not necessarily hypocritical.  Yes, he lives a privileged life.  So did the Kennedys and the Clintons.  Lawyers tend to make enough money to live above the poverty level (as do many non-lawyers).  A candidate shouldn't have to give up his life to run for office on any platform.  That's not in the requirements.  But you know all of this.  So why is Edwards a hypocrite?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right about Craig.  He is better off out of the public eye for a bit.  Take a look at this: <a href="http://phoebekate.com/2007/09/01/potty-time-with-senator-craig/" rel="nofollow">http://phoebekate.com/2007/09/01/potty-time-with-senator-craig/</a></p>
<p>Edwards, however, fits the mold for a Democrat.  Leaders are typically richer and more educated than the masses who vote for them.  Republicans tend to vote for their equals (as far as money and power are concerned, not human worth). So Edwards concern for the poor is not necessarily hypocritical.  Yes, he lives a privileged life.  So did the Kennedys and the Clintons.  Lawyers tend to make enough money to live above the poverty level (as do many non-lawyers).  A candidate shouldn&#8217;t have to give up his life to run for office on any platform.  That&#8217;s not in the requirements.  But you know all of this.  So why is Edwards a hypocrite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
