<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Art &#171; Bookworm Room</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14509</link>
		<dc:creator>Art &#171; Bookworm Room</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14509</guid>
		<description>[...]  Posted on September 21, 2007 by Bookworm   A few weeks ago, I did a &#8220;what is art&#8221; post.  Aaron Johnson, an artist who uses a cartoon panel for social commentary at What The Duck, must [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Posted on September 21, 2007 by Bookworm   A few weeks ago, I did a &#8220;what is art&#8221; post.  Aaron Johnson, an artist who uses a cartoon panel for social commentary at What The Duck, must [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosmas</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14510</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosmas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14510</guid>
		<description>Nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14511</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14511</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I can remember the hierarchy. It was epistemology +metaphysics=ethics. Ethics leads to politics. So maybe ethics and politics becomes aesthetics and then art.

The scatological goes back to caveman days. Modern art is ugly because it only sees ugliness in whatever it looks upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I can remember the hierarchy. It was epistemology +metaphysics=ethics. Ethics leads to politics. So maybe ethics and politics becomes aesthetics and then art.</p>
<p>The scatological goes back to caveman days. Modern art is ugly because it only sees ugliness in whatever it looks upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pacificus</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14512</link>
		<dc:creator>pacificus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14512</guid>
		<description>The arts have always been informed by philosophy; you can correlate the various periods of Western art with the various philosophies regnant at the time.  The utterly vapid, even vile, manifestations offered up in our era as art are only indicitive of the equally vapid and vile thinking that lies behind it.  Cacophonous music, paint spattered canvases, and everyday objects--usually scatological--offered up as sculpture, are expressive of the mind-numbing drumbeat of modern philosophy--there is no truth, no goodness, no beauty because there is no foundation for any of these things--truth, goodness, and beauty as standards are only impositions of imperialist, colonialist, bourgeois, racist, homophobic, phallocentric, logocentric Western man,and do not deserve any more respect than these "expressions" give them.  Thats why all modern art is ugly, uninspriring, and angry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The arts have always been informed by philosophy; you can correlate the various periods of Western art with the various philosophies regnant at the time.  The utterly vapid, even vile, manifestations offered up in our era as art are only indicitive of the equally vapid and vile thinking that lies behind it.  Cacophonous music, paint spattered canvases, and everyday objects&#8211;usually scatological&#8211;offered up as sculpture, are expressive of the mind-numbing drumbeat of modern philosophy&#8211;there is no truth, no goodness, no beauty because there is no foundation for any of these things&#8211;truth, goodness, and beauty as standards are only impositions of imperialist, colonialist, bourgeois, racist, homophobic, phallocentric, logocentric Western man,and do not deserve any more respect than these &#8220;expressions&#8221; give them.  Thats why all modern art is ugly, uninspriring, and angry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photo Buffet</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14501</link>
		<dc:creator>Photo Buffet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14501</guid>
		<description>Chihuly's glasswork is incredible! I'm so glad I stumbled across your link to it. I agree; THAT is art! Thanks for mentioning it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chihuly&#8217;s glasswork is incredible! I&#8217;m so glad I stumbled across your link to it. I agree; THAT is art! Thanks for mentioning it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14502</guid>
		<description>One of my favorite quotes:
"Skill without imagination is craftsmanship and gives us many useful objects such as wickerwork picnic baskets. Imagination without skill gives us modern art."
  --  Tom Stoppard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite quotes:<br />
&#8220;Skill without imagination is craftsmanship and gives us many useful objects such as wickerwork picnic baskets. Imagination without skill gives us modern art.&#8221;<br />
  &#8212;  Tom Stoppard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 03:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14503</guid>
		<description>The art that you like defines YOU.

My favorite moment in the Tim Burton movie 'Batman' is when the Joker and his minions are rampaging through the art museum, absolutely TRASHING everything.  One of them is a half-second from defacing a particular painting and the Joker's hand enters the movie frame and halts him, mid-action!  It is a Goya painting of a horrific nightmare, dark and tortured.  The Joker shakes his head to his henchman.  "I kinda like this one," he says.

You can tell a lot about a person by examining the art he or she particularly likes - and does not like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The art that you like defines YOU.</p>
<p>My favorite moment in the Tim Burton movie &#8216;Batman&#8217; is when the Joker and his minions are rampaging through the art museum, absolutely TRASHING everything.  One of them is a half-second from defacing a particular painting and the Joker&#8217;s hand enters the movie frame and halts him, mid-action!  It is a Goya painting of a horrific nightmare, dark and tortured.  The Joker shakes his head to his henchman.  &#8220;I kinda like this one,&#8221; he says.</p>
<p>You can tell a lot about a person by examining the art he or she particularly likes - and does not like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expreacherman</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14504</link>
		<dc:creator>expreacherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14504</guid>
		<description>Hello Book,

Good question.

As a "recovering" artist since the early fifties, I look at most "art" with a jaundiced eye. Fine Arts was my first college major, (Painting major with minors in graphics and ceramic technology).

I was willingly brainwashed (or brain dirtied) by liberal professors who "loved" my work. A couple of my paintings were shown in New York Galleries, one, as I recall. was "The Creative Gallery."

Then I matured and realized that my idols, Picasso, Mondrian, Pollack, and many more (and their devotees) were merely slick shills for a future Socialist society. So I gave it up -- cold turkey. Now that I have abandoned it I look back at the last three remaining paintings of mine.. I see why I was so disgusted. Terrible art... Terrible philosophy.

What is art? Pollack and the elephants know. Garbage. Some of the old masters were technically beyond compare... but such is passe' to the "artsy" community today.

My conclusion: Art was originally done to recreate what man saw of God's creation. It evolved and then devolved.. into what we see today, which is exercising every effort to take God's creation twisted and distorted it until it is unrecognizable. Hey I know, I was part of it!

Have a laugh and look at my last three existing paintings distorting reality here:
http://weaverclan.com/pics.htm

ExP(Jack)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Book,</p>
<p>Good question.</p>
<p>As a &#8220;recovering&#8221; artist since the early fifties, I look at most &#8220;art&#8221; with a jaundiced eye. Fine Arts was my first college major, (Painting major with minors in graphics and ceramic technology).</p>
<p>I was willingly brainwashed (or brain dirtied) by liberal professors who &#8220;loved&#8221; my work. A couple of my paintings were shown in New York Galleries, one, as I recall. was &#8220;The Creative Gallery.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I matured and realized that my idols, Picasso, Mondrian, Pollack, and many more (and their devotees) were merely slick shills for a future Socialist society. So I gave it up &#8212; cold turkey. Now that I have abandoned it I look back at the last three remaining paintings of mine.. I see why I was so disgusted. Terrible art&#8230; Terrible philosophy.</p>
<p>What is art? Pollack and the elephants know. Garbage. Some of the old masters were technically beyond compare&#8230; but such is passe&#8217; to the &#8220;artsy&#8221; community today.</p>
<p>My conclusion: Art was originally done to recreate what man saw of God&#8217;s creation. It evolved and then devolved.. into what we see today, which is exercising every effort to take God&#8217;s creation twisted and distorted it until it is unrecognizable. Hey I know, I was part of it!</p>
<p>Have a laugh and look at my last three existing paintings distorting reality here:<br />
<a href="http://weaverclan.com/pics.htm" rel="nofollow">http://weaverclan.com/pics.htm</a></p>
<p>ExP(Jack)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14505</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14505</guid>
		<description>I agree with you too, Mrs Bookworm.  I avoid "art" galleries, but I often go to see unusual or unexpected shows in Tokyo or when I'm traveling. In Tokyo I saw an African exhibit that was too large for any gallery in the U.S. The show was spectacular...incomparable.

This show took my breath away: http://www.theatlantic.com/slideshows/erickson/

I define fine art as work that has the power to let an individual viewer see their world in a different way.

Great art has the power to let many people see the world in a different way, often changing the language, metaphor and imagery that we all use.  Think Munch 'Scream.'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you too, Mrs Bookworm.  I avoid &#8220;art&#8221; galleries, but I often go to see unusual or unexpected shows in Tokyo or when I&#8217;m traveling. In Tokyo I saw an African exhibit that was too large for any gallery in the U.S. The show was spectacular&#8230;incomparable.</p>
<p>This show took my breath away: <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/slideshows/erickson/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlantic.com/slideshows/erickson/</a></p>
<p>I define fine art as work that has the power to let an individual viewer see their world in a different way.</p>
<p>Great art has the power to let many people see the world in a different way, often changing the language, metaphor and imagery that we all use.  Think Munch &#8216;Scream.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/09/02/what-is-art/#comment-14506</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=1764#comment-14506</guid>
		<description>I would like to propose what good art is not - i.e., subsidized by the State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to propose what good art is not - i.e., subsidized by the State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
