When the revolutionary says that he will destroy the status quo, he is lying. For you can never destroy the status quo of the human condition and its need for hierarchy and social networking. Why, to do that, you would need to be a god or at least a demi-god. Some folks aspire to that level. Take a look at John Kerry, a demi-god in the making, with the number of tools he has used and discarded.

You can’t destroy the status quo, but you can replace it. As Che and Castro proved, however, destroying something doesn’t automatically guarantee that it will be replaced by something better or even just as good.

True freedom fighters know that order must be maintained, even as chaos is sown and change ushered in. Freedom fighters may fight for freedom, but those that fight for freedom are the most bound of all, for they have too many duties and responsibilities and little freedom. The design shouldn’t be to destroy a system as Leftists believe, the design should be to reform and make the system stronger, all at the same time killing anyone that gets in the way.

In that aspect, revolutionaries and freedom fighters are very similar. Think of Robbespiere, he killed because the killing was good and because he was riding a tiger that he couldn’t get off without being eaten immediately after. George Washington also killed, but the people he killed allowed something better to be built ontop of their ashes.

Freedom fighters, thus, are limited by what they seek to create, for destroying things is easy. Creating things, however, sets strict limitations on what you can and cannot do. The Left does not understand how to create anything, except concerning the spreading of misery and chaos. When the Left says “you can’t save a village by destroying it”, you have to ask yourself “when has the Left ever saved anybody or anything”. The Left didn’t save Japan. They didn’t save Germany and Eastern Europe in WWII and the COld War. Heck, the COmmunist Part of America were cheering the Soviets on as they crushed Poland with their Nazi allies. It was only the betrayal of the Communist Manifesto by the Nazis, now called fascistic pigs, that turned the “Left” against the Nazis, and have continued to do so ever since actually.

The Left understands very well how complex creation and fortification are. That is why they seek to sabotage America and make the task of reconstructing people’s lives much harder than it should have been. In this aspect, they share common goals with the Islamic Jihad, regardless of how much they may or may not hate each other. Alliances are made upon mutual interest and mutual insanity. Insane ideologies like Nazism and Communism deserve each other.

More government money simply means that the serfs become more indebted to the aristocracy, or the bureacracy as they are now known.

This is just a bit of an extension to the conversations DQ and I have had about health care, and when it - apprently - became a “right.” And where this kind of thinking leads: if you have a “right” to health care, then you certainly have a “right” to be fed, because obviously you won’t be very healthy if you don’t eat. Naturally you have a “right” to be clothed and of course a “right” to be housed, both in the interest of pneumonia avoidance, clearly a health issue. And then a right to have a car, so you can get to the drugstore and pick up your free drugs - to which you have a “right,” of course - and then in fact not just a car, but a Ferrari, so as not suffer from any issues of low self-esteem.

And you bet: if you have kids, they’re everybody’s responsibility except your own. The fact that, not being able to afford them you damn well shouldn’t have had them is a concept that just doesn’t enter the conversation at any point any more.

So why should they have to move away? Quite clearly: anyone who wants to live on Nob Hill has a perfect and guaranteed right to do so.