Comments on: The multi-culti, anti-whitie, anti-Christ-ie classroom http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/ She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:02:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Mike Devx http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16200 Mike Devx Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:40:25 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16200 Apologies for one more note. Can you imagine if people such as Ms. Shakti Butler were in a position of power within your United States government? As a representative of the ultimate coercive power over your life? She clearly would join the ranks of all the vicious white racists who perpetrated their own crimes against black people. As they claimed innocence due to other cause, so should we. These people, the Shakti Butlers of the world, are the racists we must fear now, not the few white racists who mutter around in their corner of the world. She has the power now, not them. When's the last time a white supremacist was able to command ALL the students at a university to participate in such an intense, hours-long mandatory group meeting? Fear her. Fear Ms. Shakti Butler. Fear HER. Apologies for one more note.

Can you imagine if people such as Ms. Shakti Butler were in a position of power within your United States government? As a representative of the ultimate coercive power over your life?

She clearly would join the ranks of all the vicious white racists who perpetrated their own crimes against black people. As they claimed innocence due to other cause, so should we. These people, the Shakti Butlers of the world, are the racists we must fear now, not the few white racists who mutter around in their corner of the world. She has the power now, not them. When’s the last time a white supremacist was able to command ALL the students at a university to participate in such an intense, hours-long mandatory group meeting? Fear her. Fear Ms. Shakti Butler. Fear HER.

]]> By: Mike Devx http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16201 Mike Devx Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:16:47 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16201 In addition to this NAME convention outrage, here's some further info on what has been happening at the University of Delaware, where the students have had to participate, in their dorms, in discussions on the evil of American Whites. All students claim the sessions were presented as mandatory, though the university itself begs to disagree. A good link to catch up on the issue: http://s3.amazonaws.com/thefirecache/752.html What's particularly disgusting is the content driving the discussions, as presented here: http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/8545.html?PHPSESSID=470f1c92c6040c4251437c6301c4eec6 I'll give you one definition by its author, Shakti Butler (but read the whole thing, please!): A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities or acts of discrimination. (This does not deny the existence of such prejudices, hostilities, acts of rage or discrimination.) This is breathtaking stuff. The collectivism, the socialism, is amazing. First of all, note the last two sentences. Do you see the inclusion of "rage" in the last sentence, where it did not appear in the prior sentence? But all the other words did? Feeling a little bit RAGEFUL, aren't we, Ms. Shakti Butler? Very revealing. If it's rage, then it's not discrimination, is it, since you used the OR word between them? Such a clever parser are you! (Hillary would be proud of such cleverness in speech.) If a black man buys a business, walks in, and immediately fires all the white people he sees... guess what! IT'S NOT RACISM! Even though this black fellow might be in the upper 1% of all wealth and influence of all Americans, it's STILL NOT RACISM! Read the whole thing. Its collectivism, its socialism... its own raw, blind racism, is simply incredible to behold. In addition to this NAME convention outrage, here’s some further info on what has been happening at the University of Delaware, where the students have had to participate, in their dorms, in discussions on the evil of American Whites. All students claim the sessions were presented as mandatory, though the university itself begs to disagree.

A good link to catch up on the issue:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/thefirecache/752.html

What’s particularly disgusting is the content driving the discussions, as presented here:
http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/8545.html?PHPSESSID=470f1c92c6040c4251437c6301c4eec6

I’ll give you one definition by its author, Shakti Butler (but read the whole thing, please!):
A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities or acts of discrimination. (This does not deny the existence of such prejudices, hostilities, acts of rage or discrimination.)

This is breathtaking stuff. The collectivism, the socialism, is amazing. First of all, note the last two sentences. Do you see the inclusion of “rage” in the last sentence, where it did not appear in the prior sentence? But all the other words did? Feeling a little bit RAGEFUL, aren’t we, Ms. Shakti Butler? Very revealing. If it’s rage, then it’s not discrimination, is it, since you used the OR word between them? Such a clever parser are you! (Hillary would be proud of such cleverness in speech.)

If a black man buys a business, walks in, and immediately fires all the white people he sees… guess what! IT’S NOT RACISM! Even though this black fellow might be in the upper 1% of all wealth and influence of all Americans, it’s STILL NOT RACISM!

Read the whole thing. Its collectivism, its socialism… its own raw, blind racism, is simply incredible to behold.

]]> By: Mike Devx http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16202 Mike Devx Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:53:24 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16202 Danny Lemeiux says, I am always amazed at what rot otherwise highly educated people will accept whole-hog at face value. My advice to others, ask first “what is wrong with that picture”. That statement by Danny is as excellent a picture of rational skepticism as I've read anywhere. "What's wrong with that picture?" is a fantastic way to examine anything we're being told. Especially in an election year. Danny Lemeiux says,
I am always amazed at what rot otherwise highly educated people will accept whole-hog at face value. My advice to others, ask first “what is wrong with that picture”.

That statement by Danny is as excellent a picture of rational skepticism as I’ve read anywhere. “What’s wrong with that picture?” is a fantastic way to examine anything we’re being told. Especially in an election year.

]]> By: Tap http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16188 Tap Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:57:24 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16188 Really, Ellie? I've not noticed that, though it could be because it's not on my radar. Liberals are so very blatant about suppressing debate and I'm am so disgusted by how successful they are at it that I notice it all the time. But we all are quick to see what we are looking for, so maybe I just haven't noticed what you are talking about because I wasn't looking for it. Do you have examples? Really, Ellie? I’ve not noticed that, though it could be because it’s not on my radar.

Liberals are so very blatant about suppressing debate and I’m am so disgusted by how successful they are at it that I notice it all the time.

But we all are quick to see what we are looking for, so maybe I just haven’t noticed what you are talking about because I wasn’t looking for it. Do you have examples?

]]> By: Ellie http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16189 Ellie Thu, 01 Nov 2007 23:14:21 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16189 I wish it were true that "Conservatives relish a healthy debate on the merits. ..." Certainly many do. Certainly many if not most on this blog do. BUT, the loudest of the so-called Social Conservatives " fear such a debate and try their best to suppress it" with the same fervor as the most fanatical Liberals. I wish it were true that “Conservatives relish a healthy debate on the merits. …”

Certainly many do. Certainly many if not most on this blog do.

BUT, the loudest of the so-called Social Conservatives ” fear such a debate and try their best to suppress it” with the same fervor as the most fanatical Liberals.

]]> By: Mahlon http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16190 Mahlon Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:47:24 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16190 Danny - Total cynicism is better than the alternative foisted on our children by the left. Being dubious, but open and fair, must certainly be better than being gullible and naive. It sounds as though you merely taught your children of the pervasiveness of human bias. Danny - Total cynicism is better than the alternative foisted on our children by the left. Being dubious, but open and fair, must certainly be better than being gullible and naive. It sounds as though you merely taught your children of the pervasiveness of human bias.

]]> By: Danny Lemieux http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16191 Danny Lemieux Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:35:41 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16191 To Don Q's and Mahlon's point - I am afraid that we raised our kids to be total cynics and to actively seek the underlying fallacies in what people say. I am always amazed at what rot otherwise highly educated people will accept whole-hog at face value. My advice to others, ask first "what is wrong with that picture". To Don Q’s and Mahlon’s point - I am afraid that we raised our kids to be total cynics and to actively seek the underlying fallacies in what people say. I am always amazed at what rot otherwise highly educated people will accept whole-hog at face value. My advice to others, ask first “what is wrong with that picture”.

]]> By: Earl http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16192 Earl Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:26:02 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16192 Tell the kid about the "drives" that the native Americans had - where they got an entire herd of bison running, and then funneled them over a cliff.....hundreds of dead bison!! Let's see the environmentalist response to THAT!! Truth is that every culture exploits the environment to the extent of their technology, until they become rich enough to decide they want to "buy" some clean air and water, nice animals to look at (rather than eat), etc. We're no different. The Bible says we are God's "stewards" of the earth - if we took that seriously, we would care for the earth, without worshiping it. A nice change, it seems to me. Tell the kid about the “drives” that the native Americans had - where they got an entire herd of bison running, and then funneled them over a cliff…..hundreds of dead bison!!

Let’s see the environmentalist response to THAT!!

Truth is that every culture exploits the environment to the extent of their technology, until they become rich enough to decide they want to “buy” some clean air and water, nice animals to look at (rather than eat), etc. We’re no different.

The Bible says we are God’s “stewards” of the earth - if we took that seriously, we would care for the earth, without worshiping it. A nice change, it seems to me.

]]> By: Don Quixote http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16194 Don Quixote Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:51:44 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16194 Mahlon put his finger on the difference between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives relish a healthy debate on the merits. Liberals fear such a debate and try their best to suppress it. Mahlon put his finger on the difference between conservatives and liberals. Conservatives relish a healthy debate on the merits. Liberals fear such a debate and try their best to suppress it.

]]> By: Mahlon http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/10/31/the-multi-culti-anti-whitie-anti-christ-ie-classroom/#comment-16193 Mahlon Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:43:06 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2047#comment-16193 If your talk with your child was anything like the ones I have with my kids, you felt compelled to also emphasize to your daughter that she should never accept, at face value, anything anyone says. And this goes for the things you say, too. She should listen to and consider statements by others, but she should verify the veracity of the assertions and match those facts against what else she knows about the world, and draw her own conclusions. This is the fundamental difference between people who want their children educated (i.e. taught to think), and those who allow their kids to be trained (aka indoctrinated). I am not afraid of the conclusions my children will reach. The multi-cultural pushers fear the process; they sell only their acceptable outcome and present it as fact. If your talk with your child was anything like the ones I have with my kids, you felt compelled to also emphasize to your daughter that she should never accept, at face value, anything anyone says. And this goes for the things you say, too. She should listen to and consider statements by others, but she should verify the veracity of the assertions and match those facts against what else she knows about the world, and draw her own conclusions.

This is the fundamental difference between people who want their children educated (i.e. taught to think), and those who allow their kids to be trained (aka indoctrinated). I am not afraid of the conclusions my children will reach. The multi-cultural pushers fear the process; they sell only their acceptable outcome and present it as fact.

]]>