<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s avoid those pushy Joos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17094</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17094</guid>
		<description>Still, whoever did it, it was very appropriate, Lissa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, whoever did it, it was very appropriate, Lissa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17095</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17095</guid>
		<description>Muslims will indeed obey the law in Britain. That is why they need more popular support to change such laws. Popular support they will acquire through terrorizing Muslims and Brits.

Even within British law, you can do a lot of terrorizing. No guns, remember. Not for citizens. Not for you if you live there. Not unless you have power.
&lt;B&gt;apparently the military band at Buckingham Palace played the Imperial Death March to welcome the King of Saud. Bet you want to click now!&lt;/b&gt;

I tend to think Elizabeth II ordered that, not Charles. I'm not sure who holds sovereignty and authority over the  Palace Band and diplomatic accoutrements. However, I doubt the Prime Minister would have ordered or the Foreign Ministry. So that only leaves the royalty with enough influence to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muslims will indeed obey the law in Britain. That is why they need more popular support to change such laws. Popular support they will acquire through terrorizing Muslims and Brits.</p>
<p>Even within British law, you can do a lot of terrorizing. No guns, remember. Not for citizens. Not for you if you live there. Not unless you have power.<br />
<b>apparently the military band at Buckingham Palace played the Imperial Death March to welcome the King of Saud. Bet you want to click now!</b></p>
<p>I tend to think Elizabeth II ordered that, not Charles. I&#8217;m not sure who holds sovereignty and authority over the  Palace Band and diplomatic accoutrements. However, I doubt the Prime Minister would have ordered or the Foreign Ministry. So that only leaves the royalty with enough influence to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lissa</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17096</link>
		<dc:creator>Lissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17096</guid>
		<description>For anyone's amusement -- proof (assuming it's for-real) that not everyone in England sees it from Charles' POV: http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDkxM2E1Y2Y0ZmQ0YTQzMDQ4NmJmNWNhMjM1ODdlNWY=

(HT: http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007/11/oh-my-gawd.html)

(For those too lazy to click -- apparently the military band at Buckingham Palace played the Imperial Death March to welcome the King of Saud.  Bet you want to click now!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone&#8217;s amusement &#8212; proof (assuming it&#8217;s for-real) that not everyone in England sees it from Charles&#8217; POV: <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDkxM2E1Y2Y0ZmQ0YTQzMDQ4NmJmNWNhMjM1ODdlNWY=" rel="nofollow">http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDkxM2E1Y2Y0ZmQ0YTQzMDQ4NmJmNWNhMjM1ODdlNWY=</a></p>
<p>(HT: <a href="http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007/11/oh-my-gawd.html" rel="nofollow">http://thelawdogfiles.blogspot.com/2007/11/oh-my-gawd.html</a>)</p>
<p>(For those too lazy to click &#8212; apparently the military band at Buckingham Palace played the Imperial Death March to welcome the King of Saud.  Bet you want to click now!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kali</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17090</link>
		<dc:creator>kali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17090</guid>
		<description>Considering that the Saudis have a habit of paying for public support from Westerners, I have to wonder if Charles' demonstrated bias came with a price. Yes, I know that's a conspiratorial thing to say, but conspiracies are fun :)

kali</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that the Saudis have a habit of paying for public support from Westerners, I have to wonder if Charles&#8217; demonstrated bias came with a price. Yes, I know that&#8217;s a conspiratorial thing to say, but conspiracies are fun <img src='http://www.bookwormroom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
kali</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17091</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17091</guid>
		<description>Dang, I missed the Joey B anti-semitic post.  I have a dreadful fascination with philosophical traffic accidents, and I sort of would have liked to read that one.

I appreciate jj's explanation of why the royals do not visit Israel.  However, it cannot be refuted that Prince Charles has been highly complimentary of Islamic culture and never of Israel's.  That makes these negative emails in his team very telling.  In conjunction with the celebratory nature of their welcome of various Muslim leaders, it is enough circumstancial evidence to convince me of large bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, I missed the Joey B anti-semitic post.  I have a dreadful fascination with philosophical traffic accidents, and I sort of would have liked to read that one.</p>
<p>I appreciate jj&#8217;s explanation of why the royals do not visit Israel.  However, it cannot be refuted that Prince Charles has been highly complimentary of Islamic culture and never of Israel&#8217;s.  That makes these negative emails in his team very telling.  In conjunction with the celebratory nature of their welcome of various Muslim leaders, it is enough circumstancial evidence to convince me of large bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17107</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17107</guid>
		<description>Btw Book, this just shows again that you and Neo are linked by destiny and fate.

&lt;blockquote&gt;#  Richard Aubrey Says:
November 16th, 2007 at 2:13 pm

There is a site, Bill Quick, I think, who used to have a lefty who would write long, long screeds, much better organized than this. Long, long ones. Over and over. Same points. Same falsehoods. Same obviously planted axioms. Unfortunately for him, they didn’t look pre-fab. It appeared they were all real-time compositions. He had to actually write this stuff, rather than clicking on a link or inserting a previously-used essay.
Keeps’em out of trouble, I guess.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href="http://neoneocon.com/2007/11/14/congressional-motives-lets-not-forget-revenge-on-bush/#comment-46321" rel="nofollow"&gt;A comment on a NNcon thread that mirrors this one&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw Book, this just shows again that you and Neo are linked by destiny and fate.</p>
<blockquote><p>#  Richard Aubrey Says:<br />
November 16th, 2007 at 2:13 pm</p>
<p>There is a site, Bill Quick, I think, who used to have a lefty who would write long, long screeds, much better organized than this. Long, long ones. Over and over. Same points. Same falsehoods. Same obviously planted axioms. Unfortunately for him, they didn’t look pre-fab. It appeared they were all real-time compositions. He had to actually write this stuff, rather than clicking on a link or inserting a previously-used essay.<br />
Keeps’em out of trouble, I guess.
</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://neoneocon.com/2007/11/14/congressional-motives-lets-not-forget-revenge-on-bush/#comment-46321" rel="nofollow">A comment on a NNcon thread that mirrors this one</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17106</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17106</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;Folks, the above is how modern anti-Semitism looks, complete with scholarly references to Holocaust deniers. I debated deleting this as spam, but thought that I’d leave it at least for a day or two if anyone has anything to say about it.&lt;/b&gt;

I don't got anything to say. Which of course, speaks for itself.

The arguments are pretty standard and very easily understood. It is not the arguments that are important, rather it is the purpose behind them that is important.

I knew that purpose not too long after Joey started it up. So what is there to say to something you've seen many times over? Creativity has its limits, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Folks, the above is how modern anti-Semitism looks, complete with scholarly references to Holocaust deniers. I debated deleting this as spam, but thought that I’d leave it at least for a day or two if anyone has anything to say about it.</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t got anything to say. Which of course, speaks for itself.</p>
<p>The arguments are pretty standard and very easily understood. It is not the arguments that are important, rather it is the purpose behind them that is important.</p>
<p>I knew that purpose not too long after Joey started it up. So what is there to say to something you&#8217;ve seen many times over? Creativity has its limits, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17105</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17105</guid>
		<description>You're right, Danny.  Joey B's post will go into the trash, along with the others I already deleted, along with a reminder to WordPress not to let him post here anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Danny.  Joey B&#8217;s post will go into the trash, along with the others I already deleted, along with a reminder to WordPress not to let him post here anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17092</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17092</guid>
		<description>We have Joey B's number, Book. No need to bother with this trash. As Chilynne says, there is no need to waste time pointing out all the errors and omissions in his post because there is no point to be served, nothing to be learned, and much time to be wasted in feeding this troll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have Joey B&#8217;s number, Book. No need to bother with this trash. As Chilynne says, there is no need to waste time pointing out all the errors and omissions in his post because there is no point to be served, nothing to be learned, and much time to be wasted in feeding this troll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilynne</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/16/lets-avoid-those-pushy-joos/#comment-17104</link>
		<dc:creator>Chilynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2137#comment-17104</guid>
		<description>Hmm, don't have time to point out all of Joey B's errors and omissions, but his is a frightening post.  Yes, indeedy, Book, this is modern anti-Semitism all right.

Joey B might give some thought to the Israelis who used to live in Arab countries, whose ancestors lived there long before Mohammed was born, and who are certainly not foreigners to the Middle East.  But, Joey won't do this because only the most virulently anti-Israel, anti-Semetic writers are cited and other, saner voices are conveniently ignored.

Wonder if Joey B is a Ron Paul supporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, don&#8217;t have time to point out all of Joey B&#8217;s errors and omissions, but his is a frightening post.  Yes, indeedy, Book, this is modern anti-Semitism all right.</p>
<p>Joey B might give some thought to the Israelis who used to live in Arab countries, whose ancestors lived there long before Mohammed was born, and who are certainly not foreigners to the Middle East.  But, Joey won&#8217;t do this because only the most virulently anti-Israel, anti-Semetic writers are cited and other, saner voices are conveniently ignored.</p>
<p>Wonder if Joey B is a Ron Paul supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
