Comments on: Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars….

By: Webloggin - Blog Archive » I Think It Was a Good Speech

Webloggin - Blog Archive » I Think It Was a Good Speech — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:07:57 +0000

[...] in America speech. I think it’s a good speech and says at length what I’ve said more briefly in previous posts (and what others have said in millions of [...]

By: I think it was a good speech « Bookworm Room

I think it was a good speech « Bookworm Room — Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:27:15 +0000

[...] speech. I think it’s a good speech and says at length what I’ve said more briefly in previous posts (and what others have said in millions of [...]

By: Danny Lemieux

Danny Lemieux — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:23:42 +0000

The other Republican candidates are “angry”? Who, exactly? They sound pretty positive and happy to me.

By: jaydee

jaydee — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:14:44 +0000

I’m a liberal. But not a knee jerk liberal.

I’m impressed by Mike Huckabee for the following reasons.
He isn’t angry. He believes in using government programs to help people. He isn’t afraid of the Club for Growth. He’s plain speaking.

On social issues we are worlds apart. But social issues become less important when we have a government and courts that are bought and paid for by corporate campaign donors and special interests.

It takes so much money to run for any office nowday. I believe all of us should work together to get the money out of politics and out of the judicial races.

Maybe it will take someone like Mike Huckabee to do this.

I don’t have a horse in this race…but it’s good to see a conservative that isn’t angry and isn’t coming from the business world. Sounds like he did a pretty good job as governor.

By: pistolpete

pistolpete — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 13:09:39 +0000

I agree a candidate’s religion should not be a primary litmus test. It is important, however, to know what s/he believes because this will affect how s/he will govern. It also helps us measure integrity. Does s/he put his/her faith into action?

By: Earl

Earl — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:37:11 +0000

I’d call myself a serious Christian and there is no way I’d vote for Mike Huckabee — as happy as I would be to have him as a friend, and to worship with him — because his vision of government is just diametrically opposed to that of the founding fathers. He’s GW on steroids, and the last thing our country needs. Christians who vote for Mike because of his religion are no different (and no brighter) than women who vote for Hillary because of her two X chromosomes! Idiots all.

By: Marguerite

Marguerite — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:03:42 +0000

I share Y’s concern and definition of Global Warming as a religion and find government enforced worship alarming and repugnant in our free society. The self-righteousness of the adherants church of GW is over powering. I have a pile of paper towels that I use to dry lettuce leaves and commented to someone that it sure saves $$ to recycle them until they fall apart, after all, they weren’t soiled. She replied that she did the same thing, only she did it to save the earth. Definitely trumped my point of thrift and left me speechless.

By: ymarsakar

ymarsakar — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:30:12 +0000

Given the fact that Global Warming will outpace any other religion in government funding, power, and police powers if the Left wins, I think religion is too important a consideration not to vote for a Morman if that is what it takes.

By: Webloggin - Blog Archive » Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars….

Webloggin - Blog Archive » Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars…. — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:29:26 +0000

[...] [Discuss This Topic With Bookworm at Bookworm Room] Share Article Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Christian, Republican Sphere: Related Content Trackback URL [...]

By: Bookworm

Bookworm — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:09:43 +0000

It’s not an endorsement, Danny, but it certainly says that, if Mitt were the Republican candidate, I’d have no qualms about voting for him and, more importantly, I’d urge those who have qualms on religious grounds to set them aside.