Comments on: Stop the presses! Poll points out the obvious. http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/30/stop-the-presses-poll-points-out-the-obvious/ She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:10:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: ymarsakar http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/30/stop-the-presses-poll-points-out-the-obvious/#comment-17539 ymarsakar Sat, 01 Dec 2007 14:51:17 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2188#comment-17539 There is something to be said for dividing up the proletariat into various different tribes that can't understand each other. It makes it easy for a dominating central authority to rule over all. It is categorically better if people are united, and language plays a big part in that. While it may not be feasible to create a central primary language if everyone is speaking a different language, such as in Europe, that is not the situation. The situation is that the Left wants to create division out of unity. Out of one, many. So to speak. I suppose it provides better loot distribution if you carve it into chunks. The Democrats are the same way with Iraq and the UN and in the US Civil War. They would much rather prefer disunity and fragmentation, than prefer people being united. People being united simpy makes for a much harder to control population., you see. It is one thing to convince a group that they should work together with you and others, but it is another to use Leftist bullying tactics to make people cooperate against their best interests like the Left does with terrorists, Americans, and Jews. Remember when people said Bush was a divider, not a uniter? Does anyone actually think that those saying such things really wanted Bush to be a uniter? That would be totally counter-productive to the dissension strategy of the Left, created to further the dictatorship of the proletariat. In the end, just as the Democrats and their Leftist allies think that human progress is guaranteed by separating people out like they wanted to divide up Iraq, so do they think America's future is best secured by people splitting up and doing their own thing regardless of any care for their neighbors or peers. There is something to be said for dividing up the proletariat into various different tribes that can’t understand each other. It makes it easy for a dominating central authority to rule over all.

It is categorically better if people are united, and language plays a big part in that. While it may not be feasible to create a central primary language if everyone is speaking a different language, such as in Europe, that is not the situation. The situation is that the Left wants to create division out of unity. Out of one, many. So to speak.

I suppose it provides better loot distribution if you carve it into chunks. The Democrats are the same way with Iraq and the UN and in the US Civil War. They would much rather prefer disunity and fragmentation, than prefer people being united. People being united simpy makes for a much harder to control population., you see. It is one thing to convince a group that they should work together with you and others, but it is another to use Leftist bullying tactics to make people cooperate against their best interests like the Left does with terrorists, Americans, and Jews.

Remember when people said Bush was a divider, not a uniter? Does anyone actually think that those saying such things really wanted Bush to be a uniter? That would be totally counter-productive to the dissension strategy of the Left, created to further the dictatorship of the proletariat.

In the end, just as the Democrats and their Leftist allies think that human progress is guaranteed by separating people out like they wanted to divide up Iraq, so do they think America’s future is best secured by people splitting up and doing their own thing regardless of any care for their neighbors or peers.

]]> By: expat http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/30/stop-the-presses-poll-points-out-the-obvious/#comment-17540 expat Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:02:01 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2188#comment-17540 As someone who moved to Germany in my late thirties not knowing much more than guten tag, I know what it's like: you feel incompetent when you can't speak the native language. If you want to feel like an adult, you learn. I took a bad course for one semester, but I really learned by reading catalogues and magazines with pictures and by watching TV. I learned by shopping (including hardware stores) and reading signs. And I wasn't afraid to ask "Was ist das?" My husband helped me with some vocab, but he's no language teacher. My motivation was independence and the desire to do all the things I did at home without a babysitter. The Hispanic Caucus just wants a bunch of dependents who will do as they are told. As someone who moved to Germany in my late thirties not knowing much more than guten tag, I know what it’s like: you feel incompetent when you can’t speak the native language. If you want to feel like an adult, you learn. I took a bad course for one semester, but I really learned by reading catalogues and magazines with pictures and by watching TV. I learned by shopping (including hardware stores) and reading signs. And I wasn’t afraid to ask “Was ist das?” My husband helped me with some vocab, but he’s no language teacher. My motivation was independence and the desire to do all the things I did at home without a babysitter. The Hispanic Caucus just wants a bunch of dependents who will do as they are told.

]]> By: Allen L. http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/11/30/stop-the-presses-poll-points-out-the-obvious/#comment-17541 Allen L. Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:00:30 +0000 http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2188#comment-17541 I find the Irony delicious. Rep. Gonzalez is speaking in English in the House, where English is the only language used, that the language in the bill, written in English, has to be changed to not exclude the use of Spanish in the private arena. Positively breathtaking. I find the Irony delicious. Rep. Gonzalez is speaking in English in the House, where English is the only language used, that the language in the bill, written in English, has to be changed to not exclude the use of Spanish in the private arena.

Positively breathtaking.

]]>