<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Francisco&#8217;s JROTC reprieved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17905</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17905</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;This is good news and thanks for reporting it. As an aside, I have a lot of trouble these days labeling the left as liberals.&lt;/b&gt;

That is cause they are fake liberals. Obviously trying to call an imitation fakery what you would call a genuine article, would be troublesome.

&lt;B&gt;How does one label such people. Neo-liberal, maybe?&lt;/b&gt;

Call them by what they call themselves. Democratic Socialists and people for the progress of human misery. Okay, the former if not the latter.

You have your Democratic Socialists, your National Socialists, and your Communists.

All are based upon a social construct where the rich and powerful are at the top and the weak suffer what they must at the bottom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>This is good news and thanks for reporting it. As an aside, I have a lot of trouble these days labeling the left as liberals.</b></p>
<p>That is cause they are fake liberals. Obviously trying to call an imitation fakery what you would call a genuine article, would be troublesome.</p>
<p><b>How does one label such people. Neo-liberal, maybe?</b></p>
<p>Call them by what they call themselves. Democratic Socialists and people for the progress of human misery. Okay, the former if not the latter.</p>
<p>You have your Democratic Socialists, your National Socialists, and your Communists.</p>
<p>All are based upon a social construct where the rich and powerful are at the top and the weak suffer what they must at the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17906</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17906</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;#
Danny Lemieux, on December 12th, 2007 at 11:34 am Said:

The true fascists have always been of the Left.
&lt;/b&gt;

They may start off somewhere thereabouts, but fascists don't like the Left anymore than we do. In fact, just like siblings can hate each other horribly but defend each other if a foreigner comes in and insults one of them, so it is the same with the family of the Left.

National socialism will even team up with Communism if the hated capitalists appear to be too much to handle alone.

It just so happens that fascists believe socialists are easier to purge than capitalists. While communists believe capitalists will buy the rople used to hang them with.

&lt;B&gt;True to the liberal creed, she wants to shut down any opposition to her point of view.&lt;/b&gt;

It is not so much "opposition" as it is "competition". Socialists don't want to acknowledge that they are absolutely ruthless against competitors. That would make them into something like capitalists, which they hate and don't want to be compared to such.

The military competes for the lives of the next generation, from which it will mold and craft something stronger and more productive. Code Pink also wants the lives of the next generation, except their product differs from the quality of the US military. Thus, competition. But to the Left, it is not competition; for who would dare to compete against the Enlightened and All Wise aristocrats Born to Rule? There is only one way to do things, to the Left. All others are failures. They don't even rank as "competition", simply as obstacles.

Obstacles to be destroyed as Code Pink has demonstrated.

Many people see the purported non-violence (harmonious community valued) ideology of socialism and think that such folks are cuddly little cuties. However, while socialism does not seek to emulate the physical violence of national socialism, democratic socialism is very good at emotional violence and indirect intimidation (through gov). Obviously in a fair fight, National Socialism would wipe the floor with Democratic Socialism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>#<br />
Danny Lemieux, on December 12th, 2007 at 11:34 am Said:</p>
<p>The true fascists have always been of the Left.<br />
</b></p>
<p>They may start off somewhere thereabouts, but fascists don&#8217;t like the Left anymore than we do. In fact, just like siblings can hate each other horribly but defend each other if a foreigner comes in and insults one of them, so it is the same with the family of the Left.</p>
<p>National socialism will even team up with Communism if the hated capitalists appear to be too much to handle alone.</p>
<p>It just so happens that fascists believe socialists are easier to purge than capitalists. While communists believe capitalists will buy the rople used to hang them with.</p>
<p><b>True to the liberal creed, she wants to shut down any opposition to her point of view.</b></p>
<p>It is not so much &#8220;opposition&#8221; as it is &#8220;competition&#8221;. Socialists don&#8217;t want to acknowledge that they are absolutely ruthless against competitors. That would make them into something like capitalists, which they hate and don&#8217;t want to be compared to such.</p>
<p>The military competes for the lives of the next generation, from which it will mold and craft something stronger and more productive. Code Pink also wants the lives of the next generation, except their product differs from the quality of the US military. Thus, competition. But to the Left, it is not competition; for who would dare to compete against the Enlightened and All Wise aristocrats Born to Rule? There is only one way to do things, to the Left. All others are failures. They don&#8217;t even rank as &#8220;competition&#8221;, simply as obstacles.</p>
<p>Obstacles to be destroyed as Code Pink has demonstrated.</p>
<p>Many people see the purported non-violence (harmonious community valued) ideology of socialism and think that such folks are cuddly little cuties. However, while socialism does not seek to emulate the physical violence of national socialism, democratic socialism is very good at emotional violence and indirect intimidation (through gov). Obviously in a fair fight, National Socialism would wipe the floor with Democratic Socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17907</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17907</guid>
		<description>Neo-liberal is as ill defined, or maybe better considered, as internally confusing as Neo-con. A more accurate label might be Neo-communist, with all the militantly centrally controlled socialist policies the term suggests.
Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neo-liberal is as ill defined, or maybe better considered, as internally confusing as Neo-con. A more accurate label might be Neo-communist, with all the militantly centrally controlled socialist policies the term suggests.<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17908</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17908</guid>
		<description>I always thought that it was a little silly of the liberals to want to get rid of (J)ROTC.  If I was a liberal (which I am not by a long shot) I would want the officer training to occur someplace where I would have some impact on it, rather than have them isolated in a military only environment. But then again, those sorts of thoughts might actually take some analysis and calm, rational thinking.
Enough said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that it was a little silly of the liberals to want to get rid of (J)ROTC.  If I was a liberal (which I am not by a long shot) I would want the officer training to occur someplace where I would have some impact on it, rather than have them isolated in a military only environment. But then again, those sorts of thoughts might actually take some analysis and calm, rational thinking.<br />
Enough said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17909</link>
		<dc:creator>GW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17909</guid>
		<description>This is good news and thanks for reporting it.  As an aside, I have a lot of trouble these days labeling the left as liberals.  They have jettisoned what I perceive to be the defining charachteristics of classical liberalism, intellectual honesty and actively pushing freedom of speech in search of greater truths, and now are authoritarian - seeking to control thoughts, speech, and access to contrary ideas.  How does one label such people.  Neo-liberal, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good news and thanks for reporting it.  As an aside, I have a lot of trouble these days labeling the left as liberals.  They have jettisoned what I perceive to be the defining charachteristics of classical liberalism, intellectual honesty and actively pushing freedom of speech in search of greater truths, and now are authoritarian - seeking to control thoughts, speech, and access to contrary ideas.  How does one label such people.  Neo-liberal, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17910</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17910</guid>
		<description>Huh?  They should "have a choice" by depriving them of a choice?  Typical left-wing double speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh?  They should &#8220;have a choice&#8221; by depriving them of a choice?  Typical left-wing double speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/12/san-franciscos-jrotc-reprieved/#comment-17911</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2234#comment-17911</guid>
		<description>The true fascists have always been of the Left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true fascists have always been of the Left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
