<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m consistent in my beliefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tap</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 05:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18218</guid>
		<description>Romney, Thompson, then....Ron Paul.  Ha. Wonder what brought that on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney, Thompson, then&#8230;.Ron Paul.  Ha. Wonder what brought that on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Synova</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18219</link>
		<dc:creator>Synova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 04:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18219</guid>
		<description>I thought the questions were pretty bad but maybe it makes sense to make a person pick only one of a list that ought to be "all of the above."

I don't know if I was taking a quiz that didn't include the Democrats but my top three were, 1. Romney, 2. Giuliani, 3. Thompson.

You know, it's not that I haven't been paying attention but apparently I never watch television because the pictures came up with Romney in the middle and I thought, "Who the heck is that?"

LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the questions were pretty bad but maybe it makes sense to make a person pick only one of a list that ought to be &#8220;all of the above.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I was taking a quiz that didn&#8217;t include the Democrats but my top three were, 1. Romney, 2. Giuliani, 3. Thompson.</p>
<p>You know, it&#8217;s not that I haven&#8217;t been paying attention but apparently I never watch television because the pictures came up with Romney in the middle and I thought, &#8220;Who the heck is that?&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rockdalian</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18222</link>
		<dc:creator>rockdalian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18222</guid>
		<description>Mitt, Fred and Duncan. Not a single gun question. Nor abortion.
I am a Fredhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt, Fred and Duncan. Not a single gun question. Nor abortion.<br />
I am a Fredhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skull</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18220</link>
		<dc:creator>Skull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18220</guid>
		<description>MS Worm,

I think only one of the questions gave the option of no federal involement, so the leftward skewing is pervasive.

1) Hunter 2) Thompson 3) Romney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS Worm,</p>
<p>I think only one of the questions gave the option of no federal involement, so the leftward skewing is pervasive.</p>
<p>1) Hunter 2) Thompson 3) Romney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan K Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18221</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan K Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18221</guid>
		<description>Now I took one of these before, and found that other one to be highly accurate even though it was shorter. I think it was Newsweek (can't remember for sure). It tied Thompson with Tancredo.

This one says 3. RP 2. Huck 1. Romney.

My top three beefs are 3. That's a complete crock. 2. It looks like my "matches" are overlapping strongly with what others in this thread are reporting (the ones who seem to be as surprised as I am), and that raises a red flag with me about the size of Minnesota. And 1. That question on global warming was completely farfed up. I think GW is a scam, I think the government has a duty to call it out as a scam, I think a new cabinet-level department should be formed just to call out neo-socialist scams like this as they come down the line later -- as they no doubt will. Now where's my frippin frappin blankety-blank radio button for THAT.

Other than that, pretty cool test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I took one of these before, and found that other one to be highly accurate even though it was shorter. I think it was Newsweek (can&#8217;t remember for sure). It tied Thompson with Tancredo.</p>
<p>This one says 3. RP 2. Huck 1. Romney.</p>
<p>My top three beefs are 3. That&#8217;s a complete crock. 2. It looks like my &#8220;matches&#8221; are overlapping strongly with what others in this thread are reporting (the ones who seem to be as surprised as I am), and that raises a red flag with me about the size of Minnesota. And 1. That question on global warming was completely farfed up. I think GW is a scam, I think the government has a duty to call it out as a scam, I think a new cabinet-level department should be formed just to call out neo-socialist scams like this as they come down the line later &#8212; as they no doubt will. Now where&#8217;s my frippin frappin blankety-blank radio button for THAT.</p>
<p>Other than that, pretty cool test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18223</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18223</guid>
		<description>Rudy was 1, McCain 2, and Thompson 3.
I am for Rudy, can't stand McCain, and Thompson's OK but I doubt he has the experiance.
My Dad helped build the WTC.
But Rudy has much more going for him than that.
Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy was 1, McCain 2, and Thompson 3.<br />
I am for Rudy, can&#8217;t stand McCain, and Thompson&#8217;s OK but I doubt he has the experiance.<br />
My Dad helped build the WTC.<br />
But Rudy has much more going for him than that.<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18224</guid>
		<description>My results were R, G, T for me.  Like Z (heart) I changed my registration to "unaffiliated" so I could vote in EITHER primary.

I will vote for Rudy in the NJ 2/5 Primary.

I worked in the World Trade Center. I will never forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results were R, G, T for me.  Like Z (heart) I changed my registration to &#8220;unaffiliated&#8221; so I could vote in EITHER primary.</p>
<p>I will vote for Rudy in the NJ 2/5 Primary.</p>
<p>I worked in the World Trade Center. I will never forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen L.</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18225</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18225</guid>
		<description>OMG! I got Huckabee as #1. This thing has to be wrong, I wouldn't have him as my last pick for dog catcher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! I got Huckabee as #1. This thing has to be wrong, I wouldn&#8217;t have him as my last pick for dog catcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhombre</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18226</link>
		<dc:creator>zhombre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18226</guid>
		<description>In order: Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani.  I really do not intend to support Huckabee.  Giuliani I will vote for in the January primary, having registered R from I to be able to do that, but I don't expect Giuliani to attain the nomination.  Romney I would vote for in the general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order: Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani.  I really do not intend to support Huckabee.  Giuliani I will vote for in the January primary, having registered R from I to be able to do that, but I don&#8217;t expect Giuliani to attain the nomination.  Romney I would vote for in the general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oceanguy</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2007/12/20/im-consistent-in-my-beliefs/#comment-18227</link>
		<dc:creator>Oceanguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proto2.webloggin.com/?p=2274#comment-18227</guid>
		<description>3. Richardson
2. Huckabee (yuck)
1.  Giuliani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3. Richardson<br />
2. Huckabee (yuck)<br />
1.  Giuliani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
