People like the Palestinians have existed throughout history. What hasn’t always existed in history is the combination of the products of a decadent civilization and the product of a vital tribal civilization.

Take the steppe people, like the Kushans or Saka. They were originally barbarians that rode horses and had festivals on horses because the steppes could not support farming as a way of life. When they went down south and west and conquered settled peoples, they adopted the farming ways of their conquered subjects. This led to a decrease in the horsemanship of the new generation. It didn’t make them into farmers, but it did decrease their vitality on the steppes.

Usually once weakened this way, they then fall prey to another barbarian invasion from the steppes they once came from. That is the cycle of history, or at least one example of it.

What is rare in today’s world is how a decadent production of civilization, like the Left, can come about… but are protected from the invasions of the barbarians. So you have the two co-existing on some freakish level, when the natural situation would have had the barbarians offing the Left early.

Barbarians and decadent civilized people cannot co-exist. All civilizations became decadent, that’s how they become weak to barbarian invasions. A barbarian doesn’t need irrigation, homes, or anything like that. A barbarian from the steppes sleeps under the moon and stars, and his only possessions are his arrows, bow, and horse.

Up against that, civilization can never mobilize enough military force to protect each and every village from someone like Attila the Hun or the Mongols.

The barbarians can attack settled farmers because farmers have to stay in one place while horse archers can run around anywhere. Sound familiar to terrorism, perhaps.