What an idiot. Depending on a knife to make yourself look tough, but so incompetent you get killed by your own. Ha ha, very funny.

“I tried to get away from the attacker but was left no option other than to defend myself. In the course of the attack I was stabbed to my head causing what could have been a life threatening injury and also repeated stab wounds to my back.

As Tim Larkin says, whoever gets the critical injury wins. Nothing turns in your favor until you injure the other guy. This guy was getting cut on the head and minimum penetration stabs of the back. None of that compared to the real injury, the direct deep penetration stab to the chest, cutting into vital organs and the central nervous system, initiating shock or death if it hits or even just goes up against the heart.

In the struggle with my attacker I understand he suffered an injury but I do not know how that injury was caused.

Guy needs to go get some TFT. Then he’ll know. Instead of living or dying based upon “luck”, how about people try to get more proactive about keeping themselves alive? Or have we sunk to the level where our own lives no matter matter?

Mr Dilworth said: “The Director of Public Prosecutions is determined to ensure that those who use reasonable force in defending themselves will enjoy the full protection of the law. They will not be prosecuted.”

And how much money and power are you getting for being part of the clique that decides what is “reasonable”?

Once again this raises the question of whether the bail laws are tight enough

Their defense of their negligent homicide actions of releasing violent criminals is “let’s make more laws about bail”. Yeah, that’ll solve things for people.

whether the law is sufficiently on the side of innocent people who are protecting their own homes or businesses from intruders.”

I’m under the impression these people think there’s some justification in the law protecting criminals from innocent people. Excuse me? How the hell would the law “not be sufficiently” on the side of men, women, and children being attacked by thugs and criminals? Is this Shariah land yet, people. I’m waiting.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/28/ncrime128.xml

Perhaps it would be “And now many Christians insist that we hate Muslims to support them.”

For the record, I am a Gentile/Goy, non-churchgoing.

If, on the other hand, a group of English yobbos had attacked an Imam at a mosque in similar fashion, the good Respect Party councillor would have been up in arms about “anti-Islamic” hooligans. Respect, for many Muslims, is a one-way street.