Watcher Results
Bookworm on Apr 11 2008 at 8:51 am | Filed under: Watcher of Weasels
Both of the posts I voted for as my favorite Watcher nominations won 1st place. I was actually a little uncomfortable about Fjordman’s post, the winning non-council post, since it does seem to be the first step in a national front movement in Europe. Nevertheless, I thought it was a good post because it recognizes that, for the first time in history, a government has deliberately tried to undermine its own people in favor of a hostile immigrant group:
| Votes | Council link |
|---|---|
| 2 1/3 | “If You Give A Mouse A Cookie”… Accommodating Islam Joshuapundit |
| 2 | The Wizard of Ooze Bookworm Room |
| 1 1/3 | Assumptions & Conclusions About Sadr, Maliki and the Basra Offensive Wolf Howling |
| Votes | Non-council link |
|---|---|
| 3 2/3 | Creating a European Indigenous People’s Movement The Brussels Journal |
| 1 2/3 | Your federal Government At Work… For Palestinians Boker tov, Boulder! |
| 1 | Put On Your Helmets, We’re Talking About Abortion. Rachel Lucas |
| 1 | Is Wright Wrong? Part 2 Better Living: Thoughts from Mark Daniels |
Email This Post To A Friend
One Response to “Watcher Results”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
If you give a mouse a poisoned cookie…
One of the more interesting and effective disinformation campaigns that can be used against our enemies is to use their very strengths against them. What is the strength of the Islamic Jihad on women and children, then?
The Main Sewer Media is one. The ability to avoid Western Lawfare restrictions is another. The ability to discount accountability or being held to account for war atrocities is one as well.
So we use their strengths against them by turning the media against the Islamic Jihad. And we do this by sending disinformation to the Islamic Jihad that reporters imbedded with them and receiving information from them have betrayed them to Coalition Forces.
This is very simple to do, although not easy. You “leak” information to the New York Times by having a government bureaucrat, paid or threatened, to do it. This “leaked” information occurs after a successful targeted assassination of a terrorist cell’s leadership after that cell had “hosted” a reporter or affiliate organization. The “leaked” information suggests that the assassination was successfully carried out on tips from the media. An artificial firestorm is thus created in the meda concerning the ethics of getting terrorists killed when those terrorists are your sources and whether it is ethical to collaborate with the United States at the cost of sacrificing your sources.
The terrorists get this information and after you do this kind of operation a couple of hundred times, the terrorists will kill any reporter that seeks information from them. If they don’t already, that is.
Once terrorists become hostile to the MSM and targets the MSM, the MSM either become shills, public shills at that, for the terrorists (which is good for us since it discounts their credibility more) or the MSM starts hating the terrorists and producing hit pieces against terrorism.
All of that was inspired by the thought “what if you gave a poisoned cookie to the rat of Islamofascism” and Carnifex of course.