Islam by the numbers
Bookworm on Apr 21 2008 at 11:23 am | Filed under: Islam, Muslim violence
In an earlier post, I pointed out that, with Islam, as well all special interest groups, you don’t need a majority to make a difference. You just need a critical mass, with the remainder of the special interest group being passive. It helps, too, if the larger majority (the ones who aren’t part of the special interest group) are apathetic, or easily cowed. With this in mind, please read Dr. Peter Hammond’s article about the way in which Islam changes as it becomes a greater and greater percentage of the population in any given country. It’s a really unnerving article.
Sphere: Related Content
Email This Post To A Friend
One Response to “Islam by the numbers”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.











Unnerving is a very good word for that article.
The West is perfectly ripe for allowing the Islamic system to take over. Maybe it was one of Bookworm’s earlier posts but I remember reading somewhere recently that at some point, the Islamic system is going to force Americans and other westerners to make a choice between two values that we normally hold dear and equal to each other: preservation of our traditions, values and way of life AND the belief in the right of religious liberty.
The Muslims see this as clear as day and so for a long time, they have been chipping away at the West by asserting their “right of religious liberty,” although God knows they would never allow others to assert that same right in their home countries. Eventually, as discussed in Dr. Hammond’s article, their numbers will grow to such a point that their way of life and their incessant insistence that all others honor their preferences and their “rights” will wind up threatening the values, beliefs, and traditions that most of us have here in the West. And in order for us to protect those, we will need to severely curtail some aspects of religious liberty and bear worldwide condemnation for being hypocritical.
I hate the idea that if we are going to preserve the West, it will require us to be hypocritical on this one point. But if that is the price of survival, so be it.