But, that one did!

Don’t worry, the American Democrat behavior post 2003 kind of cured us of that. Before 2001 and 2004, many conservatives were trying to work with Democrats, and not just Bush or McCain, in terms of foreign policy. So naturally all the angst was directed, from the Republican party at least, more towards France and the Un and what not. They deserved it, after all, given Oil for Food and what not.

But it wasn’t until after 2004 that Americans started realizing that the Democrat need for international attention was not the fault of the international community, primarily. It was the fault of the Democrats trying to destroy this country and remake it in their own image. With all the bit**ing that the Democrats do, could they ever justify “moderate and slow reforms”? If it is as bad as the Democrats make it out to be, wouldn’t revolution be justified given that Bush stole the election and have now created Al Qaeda in order to justify ennacting the Patriot Act and other secret police powers derived from Emergency Laws?

So while Americans may be miffed at the British, the Europeans, the Australians, or some other such peeps out in the great beyond, what pro-Iraqi freedom advocates are really concentrating their anger on is our own domestic “loyal opposition”. They are sitting at home just as safe as we are, except not only do they refuse to appreciate it and give honor where it is due, they actively work to undermine the protection of us all.

Unfortunately, with the state of the internet it is hard to assume that it is authentic without documentation.

I got my own authenticity test. It tests on a couple of criteria that has nothing to do with sources, just with the actual testimony in question.