The fact that Europeans are mostly sheep and generating more people amongst their ever degenerating reproduction rate precisely because it is allowed to be illegal.

You don’t seem to realize that this is illegal in England ? Equally so in most other parts of Europe.

If you kill in europe, you are guilty of murder. POINT. You can get away without punishment for self-defence or defense of others. But they’re extinuating circumstances, they don’t change “the nature of the conviction”.

People who’ve risked their life to defend themelves or someone else in Europe all have the same thing on their rap sheets : “murderer”.

Most people I talk to seem to operate on the assumption that you can nibble away at this bit of freedom, and tax away that bit of individual decision-making, and control law-abiding people in this or that way, etc…….but somehow, magically, all of our liberty and opportunity will go right on, regardless.

Stupid, ignorant, historically-disproven assumption……and our stinking government schools and the ’60s-generation university profs are spreading it to virtually every young person in our country.

Not to homeschool is most often a form of child-abuse! It puts America on the road to extinction……watch Britain and see our future!

The dilemma we confront today is one where it is the sheepdogs that heap scorn and abuse on the sheepdogs for even pointing out that there are wolves that would do them harm. I have to wonder if what the sheep truly hate is that the mere presence of sheepdogs reminds the sheep that they are….sheep!

Unfortunately, I find myself increasingly slipping into the mindset that perhaps the sheepdogs would be well justified to let the wolves have their way now and then.

A fat lot of good those secret poilce powers did him. At least Big Brother societies make for nice snuff films given the CCTV cameras. They sure as shat shouldn’t be relied upon to save lives.

Hear! Hear!

Every time I hear about a homeowner confronting the home invader with a gun, knife or club… or when I read what Y described above as “shoppers converging on the attackers and killing them”, I think, now THERE are true Americans!

A nation of sheep allow predators to thrive. A nation of shepherds – or sheepdogs! – protecting their flock, keep predators at bay. Which is more civilized – the bleating scattering of scared future victims, or the reassertion of control over predators by those who know that the predators must be confronted and stopped? Which is more civilized?

I like your blog, by the way. I ran into your old one earlier without having realized that you moved and commented over there. Anyway, I hope you don’t mind if I put you on my blogroll.

You know, this is the question I keep running up against whenever I want to leap on my high horse and point the finger at those Brits across the pond. If the Brits and America share very similar vulnerabilities by virtue of having a shared history. Peter Hitchens said that he wrote the Abolition of Britain more as a warning to American than for his fellow Britons, which he viewed as being lost. They just haven’t performed the funerary rites yet… He said that even if the Tories win back seats in Parliament and took back the Prime Ministership, a sea change has already taken place in Britain no matter which party is in power.

Given that ALL our candidates (including McCain) are a Trilateral/ CFR card-carrying members, right now I’m just looking for the candidate who will try to preserve our national identity in the coming global world. Again, this may be cynical, but this is where I’m at.

An American guy, with an American dog, in an American school, in America –

http://www.sctimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080512/NEWS01/105120058

And the difference between us and England would be…?

When you have a nation that is full of weak people who have to be protected from firearms by the govmint, then those weak people will lack the fortitude to take on enemies armed with guns. And if they are so helpless in the face of guns, why not knives as well?

Many Americans themselves will say “if banning handguns and preventing citizens, including me, from using them means less criminals will have handguns to use on me, then that’s a sacrifice I’d be willing to have others make for me”. Notice the ‘have others make for me part’ since these folks are the ones so scared of guns or weapons that they themselves won’t use handguns, so obviously it’s a good solution for them to have you sacrifice your ability to use a gun in your defense, for some immaterial benefit that they see for themselves.

Sheep and cattle and serfs don’t need weapons. They’re not warriors or citizens or militia, they’re just livestock and property. When was the last time you armed your property with mines and auto-turrets for defense? You defend your property by hiring guards, you know human beings that knows how to use their brain as weapons to protect your stuff. That’s what nobles are placed above serfs, cause nobles get to use horses and military weapons while the serfs farm in return for protection.

Many Americans have tackled and taken down, successfully, robbers armed with firearms. Few Americans will be dumb enough to use a knife to try to intimidate a worker at a counter to hand over the dollars. Why?

Cause we’re not scared of knives when we know that 1. we have superior tools such as firearms to count on and 2. criminals prefer to use handguns.

When your criminals prefer to use handguns, then seeing one with a knife means that you’re less likely to panic. And that does factor into a criminal’s risk and rewards assessment.

In a way, it is like an arms race to see who can get better armed. The citizens vs the criminals. If the United States disarmed their nukes while Russia didn’t, who would have won that arms race?