When we police speech
Bookworm on May 20 2008 at 11:35 am | Filed under: Britain, England, Free speech
Americans do not have any idea how lucky they are to live in a land where freedom of speech is enshrined in the Constitution. More than that, they should resist every “soft” effort to make speech out of bounds on the grounds that it can hurt someone’s feelings. Absent this constant vigilance to protect our rights to express our opinions, we may find ourselves in this situation:
A teenager is facing prosecution for using the word “cult” to describe the Church of Scientology.
The unnamed 15-year-old was served the summons by City of London police when he took part in a peaceful demonstration opposite the London headquarters of the controversial religion.
Officers confiscated a placard with the word “cult” on it from the youth, who is under 18, and a case file has been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.
A date has not yet been set for him to appear in court.
The decision to issue the summons has angered human rights activists and support groups for the victims of cults.
The incident happened during a protest against the Church of Scientology on May 10. Demonstrators from the anti-Scientology group, Anonymous, who were outside the church’s £23m headquarters near St Paul’s cathedral, were banned by police from describing Scientology as a cult by police because it was “abusive and insulting”.
If you read the article, you’ll discover that the whole debate revolves around the truth of the matter asserted: is Scientology a cult or not? That topic might, of course, be the subject of a private lawsuit brought by the Scientologists. In modern England, though, it is the subject of a criminal action against an individual for expressing his opinion. It doesn’t seem to occur to the Brits that there might be a speech right here. Although we trace our reverence for free speech to the British system, it’s a concept they’ve apparently abandoned entirely.
Email This Post To A Friend
7 Responses to “When we police speech”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Great point about free speech rights, Bookworm. Could not agree with you more.
That’s ridiculous!
According to the usual definition of “cult”, Scientology is a cult. Sociologists of religion apply that term to new religions which are significantly different from the mainstream religion(s) of their time and place. Christianity was a cult in the pagan world of the Roman Empire. It became mainstream in about four centuries, and that may happen with Scientology, but for now it would properly be referred to as a cult since it can hardly be classified as mainstream.
Objecting to calling Scientology a cult is on a par with objecting to calling a man a “man” or a woman a “woman” or a lake “liquid”. How can there be any objection to calling something what it actually is? This is just too bizarre for words. Political correctness has gone off the deep end.
You don’t understand, Highlander — it hurt the Scientologists’ feelings. In the modern nanny state, if you’re not both male and either Christian or Jewish, your feelings trump all rationality and rights.
Thanks for fixing my password, Book! As stated in my email, I’d like to point out the absolute idiocy of the second and third paragraphs excerpts as follows:
“The unnamed 15-year-old”
“the youth, who is under 18″
We now need it pointed out to us that 15 is less than 18.
Civilization is doomed.
Sad, but true Book.
And then I thought, only a man who was ashamed of being a man would object to being called a “man”.
So, we can assume that these same Bobbies have been arresting all those marching Muslim protesters who mouth vile denunciations of Jews, Christians, Judaism and Christianity, right? Just where are they holding all those people?