<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When we police speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23788</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23788</guid>
		<description>So, we can assume that these same Bobbies have been arresting all those marching Muslim protesters who mouth vile denunciations of Jews, Christians, Judaism and Christianity, right? Just where are they holding all those people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we can assume that these same Bobbies have been arresting all those marching Muslim protesters who mouth vile denunciations of Jews, Christians, Judaism and Christianity, right? Just where are they holding all those people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23759</link>
		<dc:creator>highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23759</guid>
		<description>And then I thought, only a man who was ashamed of being a man would object to being called a &quot;man&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then I thought, only a man who was ashamed of being a man would object to being called a &#8220;man&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23758</link>
		<dc:creator>highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23758</guid>
		<description>Sad, but true Book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad, but true Book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lissa</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23756</link>
		<dc:creator>Lissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 03:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23756</guid>
		<description>Thanks for fixing my password, Book!  As stated in my email, I&#039;d like to point out the absolute idiocy of the second and third paragraphs excerpts as follows:

&quot;The unnamed 15-year-old&quot;
&quot;the youth, who is under 18&quot;

We now need it pointed out to us that 15 is less than 18.

Civilization is doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for fixing my password, Book!  As stated in my email, I&#8217;d like to point out the absolute idiocy of the second and third paragraphs excerpts as follows:</p>
<p>&#8220;The unnamed 15-year-old&#8221;<br />
&#8220;the youth, who is under 18&#8243;</p>
<p>We now need it pointed out to us that 15 is less than 18.</p>
<p>Civilization is doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 03:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23755</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t understand, Highlander -- it hurt the Scientologists&#039; feelings.  In the modern nanny state, if you&#039;re not both male and either Christian or Jewish, your feelings trump all rationality and rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t understand, Highlander &#8212; it hurt the Scientologists&#8217; feelings.  In the modern nanny state, if you&#8217;re not both male and either Christian or Jewish, your feelings trump all rationality and rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlander</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23754</link>
		<dc:creator>highlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 03:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23754</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s ridiculous!  

According to the usual  definition of &quot;cult&quot;, Scientology &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a cult.  Sociologists of religion apply that term to new religions which are significantly different from the mainstream religion(s) of their time and place.  Christianity was a cult in the pagan world of the Roman Empire.  It became mainstream in about four centuries, and that may happen with Scientology, but for now it would properly be referred to as a cult since it can hardly be classified as mainstream.

Objecting to calling Scientology a cult is on a par with objecting to calling a man a &quot;man&quot; or a woman a &quot;woman&quot; or a lake &quot;liquid&quot;.  How can there be any objection to calling something what it actually is?  This is just too bizarre for words.  Political correctness has gone off the deep end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s ridiculous!  </p>
<p>According to the usual  definition of &#8220;cult&#8221;, Scientology <i>is</i> a cult.  Sociologists of religion apply that term to new religions which are significantly different from the mainstream religion(s) of their time and place.  Christianity was a cult in the pagan world of the Roman Empire.  It became mainstream in about four centuries, and that may happen with Scientology, but for now it would properly be referred to as a cult since it can hardly be classified as mainstream.</p>
<p>Objecting to calling Scientology a cult is on a par with objecting to calling a man a &#8220;man&#8221; or a woman a &#8220;woman&#8221; or a lake &#8220;liquid&#8221;.  How can there be any objection to calling something what it actually is?  This is just too bizarre for words.  Political correctness has gone off the deep end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echeccone</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/20/when-we-police-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-23740</link>
		<dc:creator>echeccone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2940#comment-23740</guid>
		<description>Great point about free speech rights, Bookworm.  Could not agree with you more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point about free speech rights, Bookworm.  Could not agree with you more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.027 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 352/354 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bookwormroom.com @ 2012-02-10 04:27:39 -->
