<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The changing face of the law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23891</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23891</guid>
		<description>From a different perspective:
My son is concerned about the "peak oil" problem.  He feels that many of the technological benefits we presently enjoy may be unavailable in some 50 years or so, and the skills needed to enjoy anything approaching our present standard lifestyle are almost unknown to the majority of the population.  He's started collecting information.  I've picked up a copy of "Foxfire", a collection of narratives from the Appalachians.  If you haven't read it, you should.  Enshrine it in your library, and then thank God daily that we live now!  
In one form or another, except for nuclear energy, all our energy comes from the sun in one form or another.  Oil is one form.  The supply is finite.  Eventually, it's going to run out.  Whether it's 50 years or 500, if we haven't found an alternative means of using the sun's energy by then, we are going to be living in the middle ages once again.

Learning skills is a good thing - not easily discovered, not easily acquired, easily lost.  
If you're in a speciality occupation, it may not be a bad idea to gather a small library of "how we used to do it" books.  You never know...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a different perspective:<br />
My son is concerned about the &#8220;peak oil&#8221; problem.  He feels that many of the technological benefits we presently enjoy may be unavailable in some 50 years or so, and the skills needed to enjoy anything approaching our present standard lifestyle are almost unknown to the majority of the population.  He&#8217;s started collecting information.  I&#8217;ve picked up a copy of &#8220;Foxfire&#8221;, a collection of narratives from the Appalachians.  If you haven&#8217;t read it, you should.  Enshrine it in your library, and then thank God daily that we live now!<br />
In one form or another, except for nuclear energy, all our energy comes from the sun in one form or another.  Oil is one form.  The supply is finite.  Eventually, it&#8217;s going to run out.  Whether it&#8217;s 50 years or 500, if we haven&#8217;t found an alternative means of using the sun&#8217;s energy by then, we are going to be living in the middle ages once again.</p>
<p>Learning skills is a good thing - not easily discovered, not easily acquired, easily lost.<br />
If you&#8217;re in a speciality occupation, it may not be a bad idea to gather a small library of &#8220;how we used to do it&#8221; books.  You never know&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23890</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23890</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;At another level the UAV technology is even closer to making military pilots obsolete.&lt;/b&gt;

What I have heard about it is that it takes pilots away from flying conventional aircraft, whether fixed wing or rotary. It does not make them obsolete so much as a rarer commodity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>At another level the UAV technology is even closer to making military pilots obsolete.</b></p>
<p>What I have heard about it is that it takes pilots away from flying conventional aircraft, whether fixed wing or rotary. It does not make them obsolete so much as a rarer commodity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldflyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23885</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23885</guid>
		<description>Jose, your remark about the loss of skill levels is so true in so many ways.

My introduction to the world of computers was in a Navy school in which we learned to program in machine language, i.e. in 0s and 1s.   At that time the limited memory, and that is a gross understatement, placed a premium on efficient programming.  Now, even many computer professionals are several steps removed from the machine.

In the aviation business, there is concern about deteriorating piloting skills as the computer driven auto-pilots and navigation systems are close to making pilots superfluous--until something fails.  A number of years ago, as much of the current technology was relatively new, Southwest Airlines allegedly opted to have a lesser level of automation installed in their new airplanes to keep their pilots more involved in routine procedures.  Some folks accused them  of doing so to cut costs, but my understsanding is that they actually paid more for customized cockpits.  At another level the UAV technology is even closer to making military pilots obsolete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose, your remark about the loss of skill levels is so true in so many ways.</p>
<p>My introduction to the world of computers was in a Navy school in which we learned to program in machine language, i.e. in 0s and 1s.   At that time the limited memory, and that is a gross understatement, placed a premium on efficient programming.  Now, even many computer professionals are several steps removed from the machine.</p>
<p>In the aviation business, there is concern about deteriorating piloting skills as the computer driven auto-pilots and navigation systems are close to making pilots superfluous&#8211;until something fails.  A number of years ago, as much of the current technology was relatively new, Southwest Airlines allegedly opted to have a lesser level of automation installed in their new airplanes to keep their pilots more involved in routine procedures.  Some folks accused them  of doing so to cut costs, but my understsanding is that they actually paid more for customized cockpits.  At another level the UAV technology is even closer to making military pilots obsolete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23881</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23881</guid>
		<description>I started doing graphic design in 1984.  We used drafting tools, airbrushes, large camera equipment, and photo typesetters which printed text on a clear strip of 35mm film.  Also lots and lots of line tape.  

Two years later we had a computer (IBM AT 7 MHz w/ 20 MB HDD)with a 150 dpi laser printer, and a film recorder that produced stunning 35mm slides.  

By 1995 we had stopped using all the equipment in the first paragrah, and used LCD projectors showing Powerpoint and full color plotters printing 36 inch wide posters.  It has been a lot of fun learning the new technology, although I miss using some of my painfully developed skills of the previous era.

I've worked closely with photographers during that period.  The advent option of digital photography began later, but the tools have also completely changed.  

In both areas the technology has permitted increased speed of production beyond imaging, but it seems to me that over all, skill levels have dropped as technology begins to compensate for ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started doing graphic design in 1984.  We used drafting tools, airbrushes, large camera equipment, and photo typesetters which printed text on a clear strip of 35mm film.  Also lots and lots of line tape.  </p>
<p>Two years later we had a computer (IBM AT 7 MHz w/ 20 MB HDD)with a 150 dpi laser printer, and a film recorder that produced stunning 35mm slides.  </p>
<p>By 1995 we had stopped using all the equipment in the first paragrah, and used LCD projectors showing Powerpoint and full color plotters printing 36 inch wide posters.  It has been a lot of fun learning the new technology, although I miss using some of my painfully developed skills of the previous era.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked closely with photographers during that period.  The advent option of digital photography began later, but the tools have also completely changed.  </p>
<p>In both areas the technology has permitted increased speed of production beyond imaging, but it seems to me that over all, skill levels have dropped as technology begins to compensate for ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gkong3</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23865</link>
		<dc:creator>gkong3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23865</guid>
		<description>I'm in the event management/business intelligence industry, and oh yes, I have benefited greatly from the computer revolution.

Information at my fingertips, databases of relevant people to do research or invite to speak (including contact details!) - don't know what I would do without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the event management/business intelligence industry, and oh yes, I have benefited greatly from the computer revolution.</p>
<p>Information at my fingertips, databases of relevant people to do research or invite to speak (including contact details!) - don&#8217;t know what I would do without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23857</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23857</guid>
		<description>Ditto jj's comment.  Last time we had elections, I wanted to check out info on the judges who were up for election.  Looking on line, I read that it's against California law for lawyers to make negative statements about judges.
Sure makes it hard to vote intelligently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto jj&#8217;s comment.  Last time we had elections, I wanted to check out info on the judges who were up for election.  Looking on line, I read that it&#8217;s against California law for lawyers to make negative statements about judges.<br />
Sure makes it hard to vote intelligently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23851</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23851</guid>
		<description>And when the day comes when members of the public (you remember them: the poor saps who pay the bills) can get access to the records of which lawyers have had which complaints filed against them so THEY don't get blindsided- we really will have gotten somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And when the day comes when members of the public (you remember them: the poor saps who pay the bills) can get access to the records of which lawyers have had which complaints filed against them so THEY don&#8217;t get blindsided- we really will have gotten somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldflyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/05/21/the-changing-face-of-the-law/#comment-23850</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=2954#comment-23850</guid>
		<description>Interesting Book. 

I have a friend who atttended Law School and set up a practice after retiring as a Naval Aviator.  Some 25 years ago, I needed some legal advice and went to his firm, which included two partners who were also retired Naval Officers.

In addition to their Law degrees, these fellows were all graduates in the fields of Opeartions Analysis or Computer Science.  Using their considerable technical knowedge, they were embroiled in starting an allied company with the thrust of digitalizing law offices.  At the time they seemed to be enjoying considerable success--and working themselves to death.  I don't know if they were pioneers in the field, or whether they were simply catching the wave.

Unfortunately, they advised me that there was no way that I could legally kick my Employer's rear end.  Still, the SEC did the trick some years later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Book. </p>
<p>I have a friend who atttended Law School and set up a practice after retiring as a Naval Aviator.  Some 25 years ago, I needed some legal advice and went to his firm, which included two partners who were also retired Naval Officers.</p>
<p>In addition to their Law degrees, these fellows were all graduates in the fields of Opeartions Analysis or Computer Science.  Using their considerable technical knowedge, they were embroiled in starting an allied company with the thrust of digitalizing law offices.  At the time they seemed to be enjoying considerable success&#8211;and working themselves to death.  I don&#8217;t know if they were pioneers in the field, or whether they were simply catching the wave.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they advised me that there was no way that I could legally kick my Employer&#8217;s rear end.  Still, the SEC did the trick some years later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
