<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because I&#8217;m better than the New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/07/21/because-im-better-than-the-new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/07/21/because-im-better-than-the-new-york-times/</link>
	<description>She escaped from the belly of the liberal beast</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/07/21/because-im-better-than-the-new-york-times/#comment-26487</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=3269#comment-26487</guid>
		<description>Deana, you would think that, but for the fact that the NYT readership has shrunk down to the group that sees the world the same way the NYT editors do. From the far left. Readership, advertising income, and eventually their influence, is/will evaporate. Not soon enough for me.
Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deana, you would think that, but for the fact that the NYT readership has shrunk down to the group that sees the world the same way the NYT editors do. From the far left. Readership, advertising income, and eventually their influence, is/will evaporate. Not soon enough for me.<br />
Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deana</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/07/21/because-im-better-than-the-new-york-times/#comment-26482</link>
		<dc:creator>Deana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=3269#comment-26482</guid>
		<description>It simply is beyond dispute that the MSM is helping Obama.  Their claims that they are objective are laughable and yet they expect people to take them seriously.  

You would have thought that someone, somewhere within the NYT would have given this a little thought and realized that by refusing to publish McCain's editorial after they had published Obama's would solidify the public's perception that the NYT is attempting to influence the election in a particular direction versus simply reporting election news.

Deana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It simply is beyond dispute that the MSM is helping Obama.  Their claims that they are objective are laughable and yet they expect people to take them seriously.  </p>
<p>You would have thought that someone, somewhere within the NYT would have given this a little thought and realized that by refusing to publish McCain&#8217;s editorial after they had published Obama&#8217;s would solidify the public&#8217;s perception that the NYT is attempting to influence the election in a particular direction versus simply reporting election news.</p>
<p>Deana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
