<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A backlog of links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/08/07/a-backlog-of-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/08/07/a-backlog-of-links/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 17:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2008/08/07/a-backlog-of-links/comment-page-1/#comment-27031</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=3356#comment-27031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ran across this...it&#039;s a Democratic site, pro-Hillary, I believe.  Still, there are some interesting points raised about the Obama birth certificate issue.  Interestingly enough, they seem to blame Repubs for not challenging his eligibility, when a Repub such as myself is thinking that the Clintons might be holding this close to their chests till the convention.  I&#039;ve asked several places who&#039;s supposed to do what to verify Obama&#039;s eligibility and have had no response.  I didn&#039;t read all the responses (110 when I checked it!) but one person said it&#039;s not illegal to _run_ for an office you&#039;re not eligible for, and if he were elected, Congress would have to do something, and if the Congress was still a Dem majority, they wouldn&#039;t.  Interesting thought...true?  I have no idea.  But how _do_ you challenge someone&#039;s  eligibility?  After all, California&#039;s Attorney General isn&#039;t really eligible to be attorney general, but he is.

http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/eligibility-challenge-state-by-state-act-now/#more-1543


Just parking this here because there&#039;s none of the posts are really appropriate - this is the closest and no other traffic!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ran across this&#8230;it&#8217;s a Democratic site, pro-Hillary, I believe.  Still, there are some interesting points raised about the Obama birth certificate issue.  Interestingly enough, they seem to blame Repubs for not challenging his eligibility, when a Repub such as myself is thinking that the Clintons might be holding this close to their chests till the convention.  I&#8217;ve asked several places who&#8217;s supposed to do what to verify Obama&#8217;s eligibility and have had no response.  I didn&#8217;t read all the responses (110 when I checked it!) but one person said it&#8217;s not illegal to _run_ for an office you&#8217;re not eligible for, and if he were elected, Congress would have to do something, and if the Congress was still a Dem majority, they wouldn&#8217;t.  Interesting thought&#8230;true?  I have no idea.  But how _do_ you challenge someone&#8217;s  eligibility?  After all, California&#8217;s Attorney General isn&#8217;t really eligible to be attorney general, but he is.</p>
<p><a href="http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/eligibility-challenge-state-by-state-act-now/#more-1543" rel="nofollow">http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/eligibility-challenge-state-by-state-act-now/#more-1543</a></p>
<p>Just parking this here because there&#8217;s none of the posts are really appropriate &#8211; this is the closest and no other traffic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
