Me too, Luigim.

That makes you a Democrat, Oz, when you fear Palin’s contributions to “what has been happening to our country”. Certainly a fellow traveler.

“This country has been free from persons that dictate how women should choose about themselves”. What do you mean by this? Choose what “about themselves”? Should women have the freedom to kill their husbands and children if they wish?

“This country has not created laws that will abandon civil liberties for all persons.” What laws? Which civil liberties have been abandoned or about to be abandoned for all persons”? Help us to understand.

“What happened to “The land of the Free”?” What DID happen, Luigim? You aren’t free? What freedoms have been taken away from you? Do you know any countries that are more free? Help us to understand.

DG – so you fear for what has happened to our country. What are we – Darfur? Please explain what you fear has happened, is happening or will happen Are we headed for a calamity? A Gulag society?

Me too, Luigim.

Elaborate please. suek

Palin “bridge to nowhere” line angers many Alaskans
By Yereth Rosen

“. . . . During her first speech after being named as McCain’s surprise pick as a running mate, Palin said she had told Congress “‘thanks but no thanks’ on that bridge to nowhere.”

In the city Ketchikan, the planned site of the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere,” political leaders of both parties said the claim was false and a betrayal of their community, because she had supported the bridge and the earmark for it secured by Alaska’s Congressional delegation during her run for governor.

http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed7/idUSN3125537020080901

Prominent Alaska Democrats said Mrs Palin had supported building the bridge while she was campaigning for governor and reversed course only after opposition by fiscal conservatives in Washington, including Senator McCain.

“She was the only candidate who was saying ‘We’re going to build that bridge’,” said the former governor, Tony Knowles, who lost to Mrs Palin in 2006.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/us-election/this-ladys-for-turning-over-a-bridge-to-nowhere/2008/09/01/1220121135181.html

McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin

Three times in recent years, the Arizona senator’s lists of ‘objectionable’ pork spending have included earmarks requested by his new running mate.

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-earmarks3-2008sep03,0,2482434.story

On Obama, Earmarks, Palin Less Than Honest
Palin’s RNC Speech Bent the Truth on Her Record and on the Opposition
By RUSSELL GOLDMAN
Sept. 4, 2008
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Conventions/story?id=5726571

We’ll discuss “flip-flop” and “changing her position” after that….! – suek

No need to. To you, she merely changed her position, while to me, she’s being deliberately dishonest.

She wants to give the impression that she’s a reformer who hates earmarks and wasteful spending, while she backed ALL of those things when they were politifcally expedient.

Did you see this clip from the Daily Show? Everyone seems to be “flip-flopping” these days:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&title=sarah-palin-gender-card&byDate=true

Elaborate please.

Also, please elaborate your definition of “lies”, and how it might compare with “changed her position”.

We’ll discuss “flip-flop” and “changing her position” after that….!

I had a friend who’s water broke when she was 6 months pregnant. She delivered normally at full term. That’s nearly 3 months…or at least between 2 and 3 months. She had to be careful. She was not allowed to lift her 3 yr old son who was very sturdy – as in big for his age and solid. She was not allowed to do housework (she had a hard time with that one, believe it or not). Other than that, she had no restrictions.

As for the “downs baby” …what does that have to do with anything? She could have it aborted if she chose…so what’s your problem?

People like you, however, are sooo easy for bad people to manipulate. So, chill and seek a different path to happiness. This isn’t it.

You’ll have to elaborate on this one.- Brian

Her stance on the Bridge to Nowhere and on earmarks come readily to miind.

so you don’t think the cbc is credible?

peace