BrianE, check the title of this blog section.

dg, you sly dog. You were agreeing with bookworm’s analysis of the Kuhnhenn propaganda piece.
All this time I thought you agreed with it.

There’s some self-destructive Leftist ideology for ya.

saying that it is part of some conspiracy to fool people all of the time is entirely another

You said that, not me. In fact you’ve said it twice. Does repetition make it seem more factual in your mind?
I must be part of that vast right-wing conspiracy Hillary was talking about.

Anyway, if that’s the major legislation you want to tout proving Obama’s legislative accomplishments, go right ahead.

Kuhnhenn was attempting to rebutt Palin’s statement that Obama had not moved a “major law or reform”. It was his foolish assertion that the nuclear anti-proliferation was major legislation that I question.

The extent of Obama’s involvement in reform legislation– at least Obama’s assertion he worked across the isle with McCain on it is also suspect.

If you remember that prompted the famous letter to Obama in 2006 from John McCain which closed with:

“As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal (ethics reform). But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party’s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn’t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.”

Emil Jones, president of the Illinois senate and Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s enforcer, was Obama’s mentor. Obama often points to an ethics bill he “sponsored” in 1998 to bolster his reform and bipartisan credentials. The ethics bill allows Jones to retire next year and convert $578,000 (the amount he had in his account in 1998 minus income taxes) to his personal bank account. That’s not change you can believe in, it’s change Jones can bank on.

Obama’s bill barred fundraising on state property and blocked lobbyists from giving gifts to legislators. It did not, however, end the pay-to-play system of patronage championed by another Obama associate — Tony Rezko. Don’t blame Obama, though. He didn’t actually write the law, as reported by author David Freddoso:

“[Obama] was not the one to propose the ethics bill in the Illinois senate. He was not even a cosponsor until the day it passed. Five months after the ethics bill was introduced, and more than one month after it reached the senate, Obama was invited by Emil Jones to become its chief Democratic cosponsor. As David Mendell writes in Obama: From Promise to Power, former Rep. Abner Mikva convinced Jones to let Obama handle the legislation. Sen. Dick Klemm (D.) was removed as chief cosponsor and replaced by Obama on May 22, 1998 — the very day the bill passed.”

Obama has had a mixed record of reform in the U.S. Senate. He declined to seek earmarks this year. In past years, he has released his earmark requests. He worked on the Democrats’ ethics legislation in 2007, which required disclosure of earmark sponsors but balked at further reforms; earmark requests are still secret. Despite Obama’s lofty talk about bipartisanship, he and McCain furiously clashed on ethics reform, and Obama was used by Senate leaders as a hatchet man to hammer Republicans on corruption.

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/09/02/palin-vs-obama-on-reform-and-ethics/

BrianE, I did not say that. The AP reporter did.

I suggest you check it yourself, and not rely on those twits for your talking points.
And the other major legislation is?