I used to enjoy reading Andrew Sullivan (gay, former conservative Brit emigre to the U.S.). He was all pro-Bush, pro-Iraq etc. blah, blah, blah until that famous day when Bush would not speak out in favor of gay marriage. All of a sudden, Sullivan did a 180 on Iraq, Bush, and every other policy supported by Bush. That’s one unbalanced dude that I think symbolizes much of what is going on in the radical gay community.

What you have done is very alertly spot history in the process of being revised right before your very eyes.

By tomorrow the pigs on ladders will have changed the slogans on the barn walls – but what am I saying, “changed?” They have always been that way! They have always said that!

It is one thing to strip a man of his dignity, such as subjecting him to ridicule or making him a spectacle. But it is another when a man’s own actions strip his dignity from him. So many gay activists are undignified in the ways that tantruming children or petulant teenagers are. Add to their sullen disposition a host of silly body movements and verbal tics and you’ve got dignity gone on permanent sabbatical.

The equality argument is a classic fallacy that takes place in a vacuum. For example, this was the state of the argument for homosexual “marriage” before any black-robed judicial magicians had emanated and penumbra-ed that new right out of whole cloth:

— “Gays should be equal when it comes to X.”

— “Therefore, gays ARE equal when it comes to X.”

— “Therefore, how dare you assault gay equality?”

I don’t think Alinsky invented the tactic of jumping from assertion to presumption in a short time without anything actually happening in between, but it’s a tactic that the radical gay movement loves.

The silver lining here is that a great number of Americans, even including some liberals, are getting real sick of the whiners and complainers. If there’s ever a second Civil War, the two countries that will emerge in its aftemath will be called Original Recipe and Debbie Downerland.

That, of course, would only include the last 4 years, not the last 8.

If I have the timing right, gay activists launched several court cases which generated controversy in Bush’s first term. The fact that this made gays have to defend their position in public and be exposed to the “people” and their hoi poi opinions meant that the gay aristocrats were obviously feeling besieged: besieged by their own strategies which started it all.

It is an attack on gay equality to even argue about such things as if they have any relevance to Presidential power or the democratic power of the people.

But then the Perpetually Offended see slights everywhere.