All the problems with Democratic health care reform

In just three paragraphs, Charles Krauthammar explains all of the problems with the health care reform the President so desperately wants passed by August:

President Obama premised the need for reform on the claim that medical costs are destroying the economy. True. But now we learn — surprise! — that universal coverage increases costs. The congressional Democrats’ health-care plans, says the CBO, increase costs on the order of $1 trillion plus.

In response, the president retreated to a demand that any bill he sign be revenue-neutral. But that’s classic misdirection: If the fierce urgency of health-care reform is to radically reduce costs that are producing budget-destroying deficits, revenue neutrality (by definition) leaves us on precisely the same path to insolvency that Obama himself declares unsustainable.

The Democratic proposals are worse still. Because they do increase costs, revenue neutrality means countervailing tax increases. It’s not just that it is crazily anti-stimulatory to saddle a deeply depressed economy with an income tax surcharge that falls squarely on small business and the investor class. It’s that health-care reform ends up diverting for its own purposes a source of revenue that might otherwise be used to close the yawning structural budget deficit that is such a threat to the economy and to the dollar.

Related posts:

  1. Must read about health care myths
  2. All the health care we can afford
  3. Another tale of a failed government initiative regarding health care
Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

2 Responses to “All the problems with Democratic health care reform”

  1. on 25 Jul 2009 at 9:36 am suek

    An enjoyable read about the topic – sort of – that I happened across…

    http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/vin/Taking_away_their_surplus_at_gunpoint_is_only_fair_.html

  2. on 25 Jul 2009 at 10:08 am suek

    Here’s another one…includes info on the Massachusetts health program.

    http://www.rightklik.net/2009/07/universal-coverage-does-not-mean.html

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.