<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying to control the other fellow&#8217;s vocabulary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/08/06/trying-to-control-the-other-fellows-vocabulary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/08/06/trying-to-control-the-other-fellows-vocabulary/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/08/06/trying-to-control-the-other-fellows-vocabulary/comment-page-1/#comment-61399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=7840#comment-61399</guid>
		<description>Interesting. While I never cared for the &quot;War on Terror&quot; (poor word choice to make war on a tactic) but I did understand that it encompassed all organizations involved in terror, and the states that support them; the biased numbskulls tend to forget Bush&#039;s original speech on fighting terror and what it entailed which makes them more ignorant than any of their claims of Bush&#039;s ignorance. Al-Qaeda is more an umbrella group than the actual perpetrator of all those terrorists acts, so going after them only, or using their name constantly, is simply showing ignorance of the actual problem. I would prefer the phrase &quot;War on Jihadists&quot; as they are responsible for over 95+% of the thousands of acts of terror since 9/11. I am not worried about the fundamentalist Hindus nor the Tamil Tigers (gone now). They are/were insignificant compared to the Islamic fundamentalists.

Bugs Bunny was prescient with &quot;what a maroon&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. While I never cared for the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; (poor word choice to make war on a tactic) but I did understand that it encompassed all organizations involved in terror, and the states that support them; the biased numbskulls tend to forget Bush&#8217;s original speech on fighting terror and what it entailed which makes them more ignorant than any of their claims of Bush&#8217;s ignorance. Al-Qaeda is more an umbrella group than the actual perpetrator of all those terrorists acts, so going after them only, or using their name constantly, is simply showing ignorance of the actual problem. I would prefer the phrase &#8220;War on Jihadists&#8221; as they are responsible for over 95+% of the thousands of acts of terror since 9/11. I am not worried about the fundamentalist Hindus nor the Tamil Tigers (gone now). They are/were insignificant compared to the Islamic fundamentalists.</p>
<p>Bugs Bunny was prescient with &#8220;what a maroon&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/5 queries in 0.036 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 250/251 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bookwormroom.com @ 2012-02-10 07:13:20 -->
