Comments on: Bret Stephens writes an unusually elegant takedown of Obama’s foreign policy http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/09/28/bret-stephens-writes-an-unusually-elegant-takedown-of-obamas-foreign-policy/ Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:48:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Cathy http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/09/28/bret-stephens-writes-an-unusually-elegant-takedown-of-obamas-foreign-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-78504 Cathy Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:57:01 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=8744#comment-78504 I absolutely LOVE Bret Stephens - I never miss him in the print WSJ but I missed this one. It must have been in the online Journal only, so a big THANK YOU, Book, for linking to it! (I've actually written him a couple of "fan" emails at the WSJ). He's an elegant writer, in my opinion also. And if you're not getting to see the Journal Editorial Report (FOX News on Saturdays), on which he appears almost every week, you are missing the best news/discussion program on television. It's hosted by Paul Gigot, the Editor of the editorial page. I absolutely LOVE Bret Stephens – I never miss him in the print WSJ but I missed this one. It must have been in the online Journal only, so a big THANK YOU, Book, for linking to it! (I’ve actually written him a couple of “fan” emails at the WSJ).

He’s an elegant writer, in my opinion also. And if you’re not getting to see the Journal Editorial Report (FOX News on Saturdays), on which he appears almost every week, you are missing the best news/discussion program on television. It’s hosted by Paul Gigot, the Editor of the editorial page.

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/09/28/bret-stephens-writes-an-unusually-elegant-takedown-of-obamas-foreign-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-78469 Ymarsakar Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:56:47 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=8744#comment-78469 <B>They have erred also in overestimating the willingness of other people to fight for themselves, or for their freedom.</b> That's like saying I underestimate the willingness of a paraplegic to walk again just because he hasn't been able to do so recently. They have erred also in overestimating the willingness of other people to fight for themselves, or for their freedom.

That’s like saying I underestimate the willingness of a paraplegic to walk again just because he hasn’t been able to do so recently.

]]>