Comments on: CNN slanders Rush visually and verbally *UPDATED* http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/14/cnn-slanders-rush-visually-and-verbally/ Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:57:27 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: suek http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/14/cnn-slanders-rush-visually-and-verbally/comment-page-1/#comment-79362 suek Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:30:20 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9048#comment-79362 Probably not a good place to fight, although I find it unacceptable as well. Still, once they got the players union to speak out against it, it _does_ become a problem. Whether it should be or not is a different issue. MM today has an update on it (that Rush had dropped out) and the comments are pretty strong on people crossing the NFL off their watching list. Will it have an effect?? Quien sabe! I suspect Rush is going to see some of the slandering folks in court - but he doesn't promise what he can't deliver, so that may take a while as he gets his ducks in a row. We'll see. Probably not a good place to fight, although I find it unacceptable as well. Still, once they got the players union to speak out against it, it _does_ become a problem. Whether it should be or not is a different issue.

MM today has an update on it (that Rush had dropped out) and the comments are pretty strong on people crossing the NFL off their watching list. Will it have an effect?? Quien sabe!

I suspect Rush is going to see some of the slandering folks in court – but he doesn’t promise what he can’t deliver, so that may take a while as he gets his ducks in a row. We’ll see.

]]> By: Al http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/14/cnn-slanders-rush-visually-and-verbally/comment-page-1/#comment-79357 Al Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:30:40 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9048#comment-79357 I suppose the apparent ease with which the Left removed Rush from the buying group of the Rams obscures the point that his removal was a business decision of the groups' leader to ensure the successful purchase. It really rankles. What we need is a main stream conservative news network. Maybe Rush could head a consortium to buy CNN Al I suppose the apparent ease with which the Left removed Rush from the buying group of the Rams obscures the point that his removal was a business decision of the groups’ leader to ensure the successful purchase. It really rankles.
What we need is a main stream conservative news network.
Maybe Rush could head a consortium to buy CNN
Al

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/14/cnn-slanders-rush-visually-and-verbally/comment-page-1/#comment-79354 Ymarsakar Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:23:31 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9048#comment-79354 They got to keep the blacks owned by Democrats. Not anyone else. It's dangerous for slaves to start thinking about escaping. They got to keep the blacks owned by Democrats. Not anyone else. It’s dangerous for slaves to start thinking about escaping.

]]> By: SADIE http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/14/cnn-slanders-rush-visually-and-verbally/comment-page-1/#comment-79349 SADIE Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:24:14 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9048#comment-79349 NEWS FLASH: Rush dropped from joint bid to buy the Rams. I think we've got another teachable moment in history, but I don't foresee a 'beer summit' in the works and what I do see it damn ugly (not including Rev. Al's face). While I am no Imus fan in the morning or any other time; the success in getting him fired was a good dry run for future plans, which we are watching unfold one page at a time. NEWS FLASH:

Rush dropped from joint bid to buy the Rams.

I think we’ve got another teachable moment in history, but I don’t foresee a ‘beer summit’ in the works and what I do see it damn ugly (not including Rev. Al’s face).

While I am no Imus fan in the morning or any other time; the success in getting him fired was a good dry run for future plans, which we are watching unfold one page at a time.

]]>