As far as I can tell, Frank’s primary defense of Obama’s attack on Fox News is that Obama isn’t as bad as Nixon’s attacks on the press were. Given the low esteem in which liberals hold Nixon, I think we can safely call that damning with faint praise. (Or, perhaps, praising with faint damns would be more accurate.)
UPDATE: Showing that history didn’t end with Richard Nixon, Steven Crowder gives a few more reminders about the Obami’s attacks on free speech they find offensive.Email This Post To A Friend
3 Responses to “Thomas Frank’s weird defense of Obama’s attack on Fox News *UPDATED*”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.