<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thomas Frank&#8217;s weird defense of Obama&#8217;s attack on Fox News *UPDATED*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/27/thomas-franks-weird-defense-of-obamas-attack-on-fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/27/thomas-franks-weird-defense-of-obamas-attack-on-fox-news/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm Room &#187; &#8220;I know you are, but what am I&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/27/thomas-franks-weird-defense-of-obamas-attack-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-81361</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm Room &#187; &#8220;I know you are, but what am I&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9307#comment-81361</guid>
		<description>[...] week, I commented on Thomas Frank&#8217;s weird defense of Obama&#8217;s attack on the media.  Basically, Frank&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, I commented on Thomas Frank&#8217;s weird defense of Obama&#8217;s attack on the media.  Basically, Frank&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/27/thomas-franks-weird-defense-of-obamas-attack-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-80478</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9307#comment-80478</guid>
		<description>At first, I thought the WSJ began publishing Thomas Franks as a token liberal /Left columnist, much like the roles that William Safire or Bill Kristol played for the NYT. 

More and more though I am beginning to think that the WSJ publication of Franks&#039; column is a satirical jab at Alinksy, as in...freeze your opponent (fit the Liberal/Left template), personalize your opponent (pick an anti-war Liberal/Lefty with the same name as one of America&#039;s most famous modern-era generals), mock your opponent and use their own rules against them (publish Frank&#039;s columns as a parody of critical thinking).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first, I thought the WSJ began publishing Thomas Franks as a token liberal /Left columnist, much like the roles that William Safire or Bill Kristol played for the NYT. </p>
<p>More and more though I am beginning to think that the WSJ publication of Franks&#8217; column is a satirical jab at Alinksy, as in&#8230;freeze your opponent (fit the Liberal/Left template), personalize your opponent (pick an anti-war Liberal/Lefty with the same name as one of America&#8217;s most famous modern-era generals), mock your opponent and use their own rules against them (publish Frank&#8217;s columns as a parody of critical thinking).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/10/27/thomas-franks-weird-defense-of-obamas-attack-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-80471</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9307#comment-80471</guid>
		<description>They never mention what Nixon did about the people on his &quot;Enemies List&quot; vis a vis what obama does. Nor did they mention their hero in the FBI was a direct product of the corruption and illegal search, seizure, and surveillance history of the FBI&#039;s most notorious director.

These true facts of history would conflict with the liberal narration of American guilt. In circumstances where they lack war atrocities to trumpet, they will make them up as they go along. This is no different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They never mention what Nixon did about the people on his &#8220;Enemies List&#8221; vis a vis what obama does. Nor did they mention their hero in the FBI was a direct product of the corruption and illegal search, seizure, and surveillance history of the FBI&#8217;s most notorious director.</p>
<p>These true facts of history would conflict with the liberal narration of American guilt. In circumstances where they lack war atrocities to trumpet, they will make them up as they go along. This is no different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 284/285 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bookwormroom.com @ 2012-02-10 05:55:18 -->
