<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A liberal view of the shooting at Fort Hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 07:35:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81706</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81706</guid>
		<description>Well...I wouldn&#039;t call my husband a liberal, but he views my blogs the same way...!  That quote could have come directly from him!
 
I&#039;m beginning to think that the problem is that if you don&#039;t have the opportunity for political discussion, you tend not to form _positions_.  You stay a &quot;moderate&quot; which means you sort of don&#039;t care.  If you have to vote, then you make a decision(based on what, I don&#039;t know) but you don&#039;t really care.  If you _do_ discuss politics, you _do_ tend to form a position.  You care enough to _take_ a position, and to the &quot;moderate&quot;, that makes you an extemist aka a wacko - either right or left wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t call my husband a liberal, but he views my blogs the same way&#8230;!  That quote could have come directly from him!<br />
 <br />
I&#8217;m beginning to think that the problem is that if you don&#8217;t have the opportunity for political discussion, you tend not to form _positions_.  You stay a &#8220;moderate&#8221; which means you sort of don&#8217;t care.  If you have to vote, then you make a decision(based on what, I don&#8217;t know) but you don&#8217;t really care.  If you _do_ discuss politics, you _do_ tend to form a position.  You care enough to _take_ a position, and to the &#8220;moderate&#8221;, that makes you an extemist aka a wacko &#8211; either right or left wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81691</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81691</guid>
		<description>I wish they would improve open hand vs firearms training in the military.
 
 
As seen here. Just cause you once had a gun, doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;ll always have access to it. Best to rely upon what nature gave us the day we were born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish they would improve open hand vs firearms training in the military.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
As seen here. Just cause you once had a gun, doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;ll always have access to it. Best to rely upon what nature gave us the day we were born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81690</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81690</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Y:  I was trying to shelter his identity to protect the innocent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y:  I was trying to shelter his identity to protect the innocent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm Room &#187; What you lose about Islamic terrorism when you read only the headlines</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm Room &#187; What you lose about Islamic terrorism when you read only the headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81689</guid>
		<description>[...] liberal friend is a headline reader.  That&#8217;s why we had a ridiculous conversation in which he wondered about the Fort Hood shooter&#8217;s motives.  To the reader who scans, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] liberal friend is a headline reader.  That&#8217;s why we had a ridiculous conversation in which he wondered about the Fort Hood shooter&#8217;s motives.  To the reader who scans, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81688</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81688</guid>
		<description>And trust me, Book, if he thinks your sites are &#039;right wing wacko&#039;, he should see what I write. It would give him a better perspective of what &#039;moderation&#039; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And trust me, Book, if he thinks your sites are &#8216;right wing wacko&#8217;, he should see what I write. It would give him a better perspective of what &#8216;moderation&#8217; is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81687</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;B&gt;Liberal:  I don’t believe that.  You got that from your right wing wacko sites.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
 
 
That sounds like your husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&lt;B&gt;Liberal:  I don’t believe that.  You got that from your right wing wacko sites.&lt;/b&gt;</strong><br />
 <br />
 <br />
That sounds like your husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81686</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81686</guid>
		<description>Treason was tolerated by Valerie Plame and Wilson. It was tolerated by Communists. It was tolerated and promoted in all spheres designed to weaken Republicans and the Left&#039;s other enemies.
 
 
So why are people surprised that treason in the US military is becoming less rare? Actions have consequences.
 
Treason doth never prosper. For if it prospers, none dare call it treason.
 
 
Remember that, for it is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treason was tolerated by Valerie Plame and Wilson. It was tolerated by Communists. It was tolerated and promoted in all spheres designed to weaken Republicans and the Left&#8217;s other enemies.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
So why are people surprised that treason in the US military is becoming less rare? Actions have consequences.<br />
 <br />
Treason doth never prosper. For if it prospers, none dare call it treason.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
Remember that, for it is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81659</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81659</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oy Vey Halvah&quot; -  classic, tongue in cheek piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oy Vey Halvah&#8221; -  classic, tongue in cheek piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81656</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81656</guid>
		<description>Heh.
 
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/11/evidence-mounts-fort-hood-shooter-is.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.<br />
 <br />
<a href="http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/11/evidence-mounts-fort-hood-shooter-is.html" rel="nofollow">http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2009/11/evidence-mounts-fort-hood-shooter-is.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/07/a-liberal-view-of-the-shooting-at-fort-hood/comment-page-1/#comment-81644</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9529#comment-81644</guid>
		<description>“&lt;strong&gt;You&lt;/strong&gt; need to lock it (bullsh**t) up, Liberal&quot;.
Pretty tough to read truth when your eyes edit out any word or phrase that doesn&#039;t exist in your universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<strong>You</strong> need to lock it (bullsh**t) up, Liberal&#8221;.<br />
Pretty tough to read truth when your eyes edit out any word or phrase that doesn&#8217;t exist in your universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
