<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fort Hood terrorist as a military role model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:16:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Links to Visit Today&#8230; NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82390</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Links to Visit Today&#8230; NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82390</guid>
		<description>[...] Bookworm Room &#8211; The Fort Hood terrorist as a military role model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bookworm Room &#8211; The Fort Hood terrorist as a military role model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82388</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82388</guid>
		<description>There is no such thing as treason against the US Constitution. That currency has been devalued. However, there is still treason against social justice, the poor, and the Democrat party, of course.
 
 
I don&#039;t expect Hasan to be charged with treason. If he is, Holder has ever interest in making sure he walks sooner or later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no such thing as treason against the US Constitution. That currency has been devalued. However, there is still treason against social justice, the poor, and the Democrat party, of course.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
I don&#8217;t expect Hasan to be charged with treason. If he is, Holder has ever interest in making sure he walks sooner or later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suek</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82386</link>
		<dc:creator>suek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82386</guid>
		<description>&quot;...saying that I should never use the word “Major” in the same sentence as that killer’s name.&quot;
 
I&#039;m not sure I agree with this.  Let him carry the rank.  And let&#039;s prosecute him for treason.  If he&#039;s _not_ military, he&#039;s only guilty of murder - heinous as that is.   But let&#039;s not forget that he associated himself with the enemy.  He carried out his act as an enemy infiltrator.  He&#039;s guilty of treason.  He&#039;s a traitor.
 
Let&#039;s not forget that.  Prosecute him for it.  Don&#039;t stop with &quot;just&quot; murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;saying that I should never use the word “Major” in the same sentence as that killer’s name.&#8221;<br />
 <br />
I&#8217;m not sure I agree with this.  Let him carry the rank.  And let&#8217;s prosecute him for treason.  If he&#8217;s _not_ military, he&#8217;s only guilty of murder &#8211; heinous as that is.   But let&#8217;s not forget that he associated himself with the enemy.  He carried out his act as an enemy infiltrator.  He&#8217;s guilty of treason.  He&#8217;s a traitor.<br />
 <br />
Let&#8217;s not forget that.  Prosecute him for it.  Don&#8217;t stop with &#8220;just&#8221; murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quisp</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82372</link>
		<dc:creator>Quisp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82372</guid>
		<description>Among the many offensive things about Code Pink is the propensity to treat our military men and women as slightly simple children in need of coddling and protection.  I really hate the condescension and the underlying theory that of course the poor babies are mentally deficient, otherwise they wouldn&#039;t be in the military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the many offensive things about Code Pink is the propensity to treat our military men and women as slightly simple children in need of coddling and protection.  I really hate the condescension and the underlying theory that of course the poor babies are mentally deficient, otherwise they wouldn&#8217;t be in the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82361</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82361</guid>
		<description>http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=58288#more
&lt;strong&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The theory most often suggested is that we like the idea of a love interest we can change for the better. But wouldn’t it be easier to go for someone who doesn&#039;t need changing in the first place, and who isn’t so likely to rip out our hearts (figuratively or literally)? Why is dangerous so much more appealing than safe? I think psychology may provide an answer.&lt;/strong&gt;
 
Curiously enough, the rest of the article makes the unstated case for why women fall for Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=58288#more" rel="nofollow">http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=blog&amp;id=58288#more</a><br />
<strong><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>The theory most often suggested is that we like the idea of a love interest we can change for the better. But wouldn’t it be easier to go for someone who doesn&#8217;t need changing in the first place, and who isn’t so likely to rip out our hearts (figuratively or literally)? Why is dangerous so much more appealing than safe? I think psychology may provide an answer.</strong><br />
 <br />
Curiously enough, the rest of the article makes the unstated case for why women fall for Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/16/the-fort-hood-terrorist-as-a-military-role-model/comment-page-1/#comment-82354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9682#comment-82354</guid>
		<description>If you are on the old template, you&#039;d see Code Pink as just something of a political difference. Sure, some people may not like their views, but you have a duty to defend their right of expression to the death, right. But in reality, using the New Template of jihadist and communist violent revolution, you can see that you aren&#039;t fighting to the death for their free expression.
 
You are fighting and dying so that they can commit successful treason through the active aiding, abetting, financial support, or active support of shooters and wet work assassins like Hasan.
 
That&#039;s what you&#039;ll be fighting for. The Old Template idea that we&#039;re all Americans, fighting for, generally, the same cause, that just because we disagree is no reason to violently suppress the other, is just what it is: old.
 
Meet the New World, people. Obamaca</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are on the old template, you&#8217;d see Code Pink as just something of a political difference. Sure, some people may not like their views, but you have a duty to defend their right of expression to the death, right. But in reality, using the New Template of jihadist and communist violent revolution, you can see that you aren&#8217;t fighting to the death for their free expression.<br />
 <br />
You are fighting and dying so that they can commit successful treason through the active aiding, abetting, financial support, or active support of shooters and wet work assassins like Hasan.<br />
 <br />
That&#8217;s what you&#8217;ll be fighting for. The Old Template idea that we&#8217;re all Americans, fighting for, generally, the same cause, that just because we disagree is no reason to violently suppress the other, is just what it is: old.<br />
 <br />
Meet the New World, people. Obamaca</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
