<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global warming a hoax from start to finish?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83294</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83294</guid>
		<description>Sadie #26:
Horowitz&#039; article is brilliant.  As a dedicated and influential 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s leftist, he knows the playbook.  Now that he&#039;s become a conservative activist, he sees both sides clearly.  Read his advice, take it to heart!  Every word he wrote rings true to me.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie #26:<br />
Horowitz&#8217; article is brilliant.  As a dedicated and influential 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s leftist, he knows the playbook.  Now that he&#8217;s become a conservative activist, he sees both sides clearly.  Read his advice, take it to heart!  Every word he wrote rings true to me.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83285</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83285</guid>
		<description>
&lt;strong&gt;Mike Devx&lt;/strong&gt;
You are not alone. David Horowitz has this to say...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://frontpagemag.com/2009/11/26/the-art-of-political-war-for-tea-parties-by-david-horowitz/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2009/11/26/the-art-of-political-war-for-tea-parties-by-david-horowitz/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mike Devx</strong><br />
You are not alone. David Horowitz has this to say&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://frontpagemag.com/2009/11/26/the-art-of-political-war-for-tea-parties-by-david-horowitz/" rel="nofollow">http://frontpagemag.com/2009/11/26/the-art-of-political-war-for-tea-parties-by-david-horowitz/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83272</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83272</guid>
		<description>Global religious warming has become the opiate of the people, Mike.
The masses are easily placated as long as they have not taken a direct hit. One day oil will hit $100 and $200 and upwards along with the &#039;smart meter&#039; from electric and gas companies (current litigation  S.F. now and they are active in Delware and slated for Pa. sometime within a couple of years) under the guise of conserving energy.
I agree with you, there must be a voice of reasoning heard loud and clear now and most importantly consistently. The cry of &lt;em&gt;&#039;drill baby drill&#039; &lt;/em&gt;lacked political push for legislation with a clear outline of an eye to the future. The conservatives and libs drink from the same trough.  The lack of terms limits is the great inhibitor. Both houses are like a roach motel, you go in but you don&#039;t come out (until death in most cases). It&#039;s a warm, cozy, rich and supportive environment and (for most) their purpose is to get elected not serve.
The $64,000 question: Why do we make it so easy for them?
What is needed is 50+ organizors to address the issue state by state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global religious warming has become the opiate of the people, Mike.<br />
The masses are easily placated as long as they have not taken a direct hit. One day oil will hit $100 and $200 and upwards along with the &#8216;smart meter&#8217; from electric and gas companies (current litigation  S.F. now and they are active in Delware and slated for Pa. sometime within a couple of years) under the guise of conserving energy.<br />
I agree with you, there must be a voice of reasoning heard loud and clear now and most importantly consistently. The cry of <em>&#8216;drill baby drill&#8217; </em>lacked political push for legislation with a clear outline of an eye to the future. The conservatives and libs drink from the same trough.  The lack of terms limits is the great inhibitor. Both houses are like a roach motel, you go in but you don&#8217;t come out (until death in most cases). It&#8217;s a warm, cozy, rich and supportive environment and (for most) their purpose is to get elected not serve.<br />
The $64,000 question: Why do we make it so easy for them?<br />
What is needed is 50+ organizors to address the issue state by state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83264</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 03:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83264</guid>
		<description>An example of what I&#039;m talking about.  From Victor Davis Hanson&#039;s latest column, one of his obvious conclusions:
(begin quote)
A global recession has led to low oil prices. Yet in this window of opportunity, America has not decreased its foreign-oil dependence. We are not encouraging domestic exploration. And we are still ambivalent on nuclear power.

But as the world economy recovers, oil will probably surge back over $100 a barrel, increasing our oil-import tab by 25 percent or more. The Obama administration, though, mostly is obsessed with subsidizing relatively small amounts of wind and solar power. It likely won’t be long before angry motorists at the pump are demanding to know why we have not pushed for more development at home of still-plentiful natural-gas and oil fields.
(end quote)


I think his conclusion is clear.  Angry public reaction to higher gas and oil prices is inevitable.  Prudent conservatism demands long-term planning.  Remember the days, long ago, when &quot;long term planning&quot; was even possible, and meant you were wise?


So where are our conservatives, in Congress, demanding of Democrats that they invest in our oil infrastructure?  Over and over - they SHOULD be demanding this of the Democrats.  Setting them up for the inevitable future backlash.  Get all the demands on video NOW. Show foresight.  Show prudent planning.  Show wisdom.


But no.  All I ever see, all I ever hear from them, is crickets chirping.  Then eventually an issue rises to the surface, and the citizenry erupt, and THEN, and ONLY THEN, can our great GOP representatives be found talking about it.  Just for a short time.  Then the furor dies down... and the &quot;intense GOP concern&quot; disappears, too.


Of what use is any of this?  No wonder we gain nothing.  We&#039;re playing by the Democrat rules, we&#039;re playing the Democrat game.  We have no prudence, we have no wisdom, we have no plan.  We have no courage, especially not the courage of our convictions.  How can you have the courage of your convictions, when you have no convictions.


That is why I&#039;m abandoning the national GOP and the national RNC.  The pattern of utter worthlessness is too consistent.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An example of what I&#8217;m talking about.  From Victor Davis Hanson&#8217;s latest column, one of his obvious conclusions:<br />
(begin quote)<br />
A global recession has led to low oil prices. Yet in this window of opportunity, America has not decreased its foreign-oil dependence. We are not encouraging domestic exploration. And we are still ambivalent on nuclear power.</p>
<p>But as the world economy recovers, oil will probably surge back over $100 a barrel, increasing our oil-import tab by 25 percent or more. The Obama administration, though, mostly is obsessed with subsidizing relatively small amounts of wind and solar power. It likely won’t be long before angry motorists at the pump are demanding to know why we have not pushed for more development at home of still-plentiful natural-gas and oil fields.<br />
(end quote)</p>
<p>I think his conclusion is clear.  Angry public reaction to higher gas and oil prices is inevitable.  Prudent conservatism demands long-term planning.  Remember the days, long ago, when &#8220;long term planning&#8221; was even possible, and meant you were wise?</p>
<p>So where are our conservatives, in Congress, demanding of Democrats that they invest in our oil infrastructure?  Over and over &#8211; they SHOULD be demanding this of the Democrats.  Setting them up for the inevitable future backlash.  Get all the demands on video NOW. Show foresight.  Show prudent planning.  Show wisdom.</p>
<p>But no.  All I ever see, all I ever hear from them, is crickets chirping.  Then eventually an issue rises to the surface, and the citizenry erupt, and THEN, and ONLY THEN, can our great GOP representatives be found talking about it.  Just for a short time.  Then the furor dies down&#8230; and the &#8220;intense GOP concern&#8221; disappears, too.</p>
<p>Of what use is any of this?  No wonder we gain nothing.  We&#8217;re playing by the Democrat rules, we&#8217;re playing the Democrat game.  We have no prudence, we have no wisdom, we have no plan.  We have no courage, especially not the courage of our convictions.  How can you have the courage of your convictions, when you have no convictions.</p>
<p>That is why I&#8217;m abandoning the national GOP and the national RNC.  The pattern of utter worthlessness is too consistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83249</guid>
		<description>&quot;And why do we keep allowing it?&quot;
 
 
People don&#039;t like extreme measures. They like to get along to go along. Social revolutionaries have exploited this need of the 68 percentile of greater humanity often times.
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And why do we keep allowing it?&#8221;<br />
 <br />
 <br />
People don&#8217;t like extreme measures. They like to get along to go along. Social revolutionaries have exploited this need of the 68 percentile of greater humanity often times.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83244</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83244</guid>
		<description>colorless.blue.ideas #21:
 
&gt; I’m a bit less disillusioned than you are
&gt; For example, almost every single Republican in Congress has voted against the various Obamacare bills. There are a few whose overcoats may be inside out and buttoned in back, but the overwhelming majority have held the line.


I hope you&#039;re right and I&#039;m wrong, because that would be better for us all.  But I believe they voted against it near-unanimously because their voters are so dramatically against it.  Not out of any principled stand that *they could explain*, but solely based on polls.  The health care bills are one of a very few situations where the voters are speaking en masse in one direction only - at least in their districts.  This one&#039;s a no-brainer for the congress critters.


If you asked them to explain their voting pattern - what principles led you to vote X on this bill, and Y on that bill... you&#039;ll find that they practically *cannot* explain themselves.  A pattern of explanation will emerge that will make you see that most of them are as shallow as Obama.  They are about one thing and one thing only - getting reelected.  Getting reelected is fine, if they stood up for this country and fought for the principles we hold dear, but they don&#039;t fight.  THEY DON&#039;T FIGHT. 


I&#039;ve never been an advocate of term limits for the higher positions in our national government, but I&#039;m beginning to change my mind.  If term limits are good enough for the President, then they&#039;re good enough for the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, too.  Either apply them across the board, or repeal the limits on the President.  Let&#039;s be consistent.  (Of course there&#039;s a risk here - since Congress is the national government branch that actually controls the flow of money, term limits run the risk of the rascals actually becoming MORE corrupt as they would have only twelve years (or so) to set themselves up for life, as opposed to what we have now, where they can take their time about the graft and corruption, because once elected, all they have to do is ensure their re-election.


On the plus side for term limits, these people hob nob with each other at all the same parties in the fever-swamp that is Washington D.C., and they come to be immersed in that culture and lose touch with much of the conservative sanity that they might have had when they first arrived. (Speaking broadly here, for there are exceptions of course.)


I ask myself over and over: Why did it seem to me that forty years ago and before then, both Democrats and Republicans seemed to be interested in improving the daily lives of most of all Americans?  They used to be in the game &quot;for America&quot;.   I have seen less and less of that as the years go by.   I genuinely believe we are living in the age of Cronyism.  Crony Socialism for the Democrats, and Crony Capitalism for the Republicans (again, painting with a broad brush.)  It&#039;s corruption, pure and simple, and they don&#039;t give a damn about any of us.


You could say that the choice, every two years, between the Dems and the Repubs is like the choice between a child molester and a thief, and so you&#039;d better vote for the thief - the lesser of two evils.  But what if the choice is between a child molester and a serial rapist?  What&#039;s the difference in the lesser of two evils when they&#039;re both so bad, you really have no business voting for either?


So yes I agree, analyze each candidate for what they are worth, and how principled they are, and support them as you can... but as for me, when it comes to the national organizations of the GOP, including the RNC, I am at the point where I believe they are beyond redemption, and hopelessly corrupted.  I no longer can trust someone simply because of the &quot;R&quot; next to their name.  I cannot trust it AT ALL.  If I don&#039;t know what they stand for; if they haven&#039;t consistently set forth conservative principles;  if they play along and go along to get along in the corridors of Washington D.C., only to suddenly turn conservative in their ad campaigns as election season kicks off... I will in fact vote against them in the primaries, and probably not vote either way in the general election, in their case.


There have been repeated travesties such as the Scozzafava election where she. the anointed GOP candidate, withdrew and endorsed the Democrat over her more-conservative rival.  Over and over we find secret liberals running under the GOP banner.  Why?  And why do we keep allowing it?  To what extent does our own acceptance of this fuel the problem?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>colorless.blue.ideas #21:<br />
 <br />
&gt; I’m a bit less disillusioned than you are<br />
&gt; For example, almost every single Republican in Congress has voted against the various Obamacare bills. There are a few whose overcoats may be inside out and buttoned in back, but the overwhelming majority have held the line.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;re right and I&#8217;m wrong, because that would be better for us all.  But I believe they voted against it near-unanimously because their voters are so dramatically against it.  Not out of any principled stand that *they could explain*, but solely based on polls.  The health care bills are one of a very few situations where the voters are speaking en masse in one direction only &#8211; at least in their districts.  This one&#8217;s a no-brainer for the congress critters.</p>
<p>If you asked them to explain their voting pattern &#8211; what principles led you to vote X on this bill, and Y on that bill&#8230; you&#8217;ll find that they practically *cannot* explain themselves.  A pattern of explanation will emerge that will make you see that most of them are as shallow as Obama.  They are about one thing and one thing only &#8211; getting reelected.  Getting reelected is fine, if they stood up for this country and fought for the principles we hold dear, but they don&#8217;t fight.  THEY DON&#8217;T FIGHT. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never been an advocate of term limits for the higher positions in our national government, but I&#8217;m beginning to change my mind.  If term limits are good enough for the President, then they&#8217;re good enough for the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate, too.  Either apply them across the board, or repeal the limits on the President.  Let&#8217;s be consistent.  (Of course there&#8217;s a risk here &#8211; since Congress is the national government branch that actually controls the flow of money, term limits run the risk of the rascals actually becoming MORE corrupt as they would have only twelve years (or so) to set themselves up for life, as opposed to what we have now, where they can take their time about the graft and corruption, because once elected, all they have to do is ensure their re-election.</p>
<p>On the plus side for term limits, these people hob nob with each other at all the same parties in the fever-swamp that is Washington D.C., and they come to be immersed in that culture and lose touch with much of the conservative sanity that they might have had when they first arrived. (Speaking broadly here, for there are exceptions of course.)</p>
<p>I ask myself over and over: Why did it seem to me that forty years ago and before then, both Democrats and Republicans seemed to be interested in improving the daily lives of most of all Americans?  They used to be in the game &#8220;for America&#8221;.   I have seen less and less of that as the years go by.   I genuinely believe we are living in the age of Cronyism.  Crony Socialism for the Democrats, and Crony Capitalism for the Republicans (again, painting with a broad brush.)  It&#8217;s corruption, pure and simple, and they don&#8217;t give a damn about any of us.</p>
<p>You could say that the choice, every two years, between the Dems and the Repubs is like the choice between a child molester and a thief, and so you&#8217;d better vote for the thief &#8211; the lesser of two evils.  But what if the choice is between a child molester and a serial rapist?  What&#8217;s the difference in the lesser of two evils when they&#8217;re both so bad, you really have no business voting for either?</p>
<p>So yes I agree, analyze each candidate for what they are worth, and how principled they are, and support them as you can&#8230; but as for me, when it comes to the national organizations of the GOP, including the RNC, I am at the point where I believe they are beyond redemption, and hopelessly corrupted.  I no longer can trust someone simply because of the &#8220;R&#8221; next to their name.  I cannot trust it AT ALL.  If I don&#8217;t know what they stand for; if they haven&#8217;t consistently set forth conservative principles;  if they play along and go along to get along in the corridors of Washington D.C., only to suddenly turn conservative in their ad campaigns as election season kicks off&#8230; I will in fact vote against them in the primaries, and probably not vote either way in the general election, in their case.</p>
<p>There have been repeated travesties such as the Scozzafava election where she. the anointed GOP candidate, withdrew and endorsed the Democrat over her more-conservative rival.  Over and over we find secret liberals running under the GOP banner.  Why?  And why do we keep allowing it?  To what extent does our own acceptance of this fuel the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colorless.blue.ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83203</link>
		<dc:creator>colorless.blue.ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83203</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit less disillusioned than you are, &lt;strong&gt;Mike Devx&lt;/strong&gt;.  For example, almost every single Republican in Congress has voted against the various Obamacare bills.  There are a few whose overcoats may be inside out and buttoned in back, but the overwhelming majority have held the line.  I do think that some of the Republicans in Congress are more partisan than principled in this, but human beings are really rather complex and tend to be that way.
What I&#039;m currently doing:

Not supporting the RNC for now (and letting them know why), 
Checking out our local Republican party (my plan for the next few weeks), and 
Becoming a bit more active in the Tea Party movement.

I think we need to be very much on guard against trash-talking and broad-brushing Republicans; rather, we should be encouraging where encouragement is needed, and working for better senators and representatives whenever possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit less disillusioned than you are, <strong>Mike Devx</strong>.  For example, almost every single Republican in Congress has voted against the various Obamacare bills.  There are a few whose overcoats may be inside out and buttoned in back, but the overwhelming majority have held the line.  I do think that some of the Republicans in Congress are more partisan than principled in this, but human beings are really rather complex and tend to be that way.<br />
What I&#8217;m currently doing:</p>
<p>Not supporting the RNC for now (and letting them know why),<br />
Checking out our local Republican party (my plan for the next few weeks), and<br />
Becoming a bit more active in the Tea Party movement.</p>
<p>I think we need to be very much on guard against trash-talking and broad-brushing Republicans; rather, we should be encouraging where encouragement is needed, and working for better senators and representatives whenever possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83167</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83167</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Mike
&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Unprecedented?!? &lt;/strong&gt;I would have called it Unprecedential (I like making up new words)
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091125/pl_politico/29896&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091125/pl_politico/29896&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mike<br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Unprecedented?!? </strong>I would have called it Unprecedential (I like making up new words)<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091125/pl_politico/29896" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20091125/pl_politico/29896</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SADIE</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83166</link>
		<dc:creator>SADIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83166</guid>
		<description>
&lt;strong&gt;Mike Devx&lt;/strong&gt;
When I last looked it had 25,000 hits
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk&amp;feature=player_embedded&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk&amp;feature=player_embedded&lt;/a&gt;
To warm the cockles of your heart and assure you that your voice is not a lone wolf howling in the wind..choose any link and go to the reader comments and listen to the chorus of voices.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theblogmocracy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theblogmocracy.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mike Devx</strong><br />
When I last looked it had 25,000 hits<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk&#038;feature=player_embedded</a><br />
To warm the cockles of your heart and assure you that your voice is not a lone wolf howling in the wind..choose any link and go to the reader comments and listen to the chorus of voices.<br />
<a href="http://www.theblogmocracy.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theblogmocracy.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2009/11/23/global-warming-a-hoax-from-start-to-finish/comment-page-1/#comment-83112</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=9786#comment-83112</guid>
		<description>Sadie #13 said,
&gt; Short, but not sweet. The RNC has nothing to say, but plenty to be read from the comment section.


It warms  my heart to see so many commenters agree with me that they have had it with the RNC and the GOP establishment.  I was feeling quite alone these last few months as I became more and more disillusioned with their lack of fight.  And their lack of fight is caused by their lack of principles.  They don&#039;t know what their supposed conservatism is based on, because they haven&#039;t thought about their principles.  They can&#039;t explain their principles.  They can&#039;t give a speech that fires you up because their belief in their own principles is so shallow.  They&#039;re adrift and helpless.


You can only get so far muttering &quot;lower taxes&quot; over and over and over.  You have to know what your principles are, and you have to be able to explain them, before you can fight for them.   As Sadie closed her post:  We&#039;re on our own.


I&#039;ll repeat Sadie&#039;s link, too, in case you want to go read those refreshing comments:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/1/486414.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/1/486414.html&lt;/a&gt;


They don&#039;t read the bills, they don&#039;t fight against bad legislation.  They can&#039;t give a speech if they&#039;re lives depended on it.  All they want to do is raise more money for their own re-election.  In fact, it seems that that&#039;s all they CAN do.  They&#039;re ineffective at best, most likely they&#039;re just plain stupid and incompetent, and at worst they&#039;re mired in the entire DC swamp of complete corruption.  Yes, Virginia... all of D.C., including 95% of our GOP, CAN in fact be nothing more than completely corrupt.


Are the scales falling from our eyes, finally, as we perceive a basic truth?  Not only may Obama be exposing the hard left to all Americans to clearly see... he may be exposing the entire GOP, too, as a false, corrupt organization.   I urge all of you, as we head towards the 2010 elections, to put the GOP on trial in your heads.  If they don&#039;t fight, and fight effectively, we should abandon them.  Because the principles of the fight have never been clearer.  The necessity of the fight has never been clearer.  If they can&#039;t fight effectively NOW, given everything that is going on these days, they will never be able to.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadie #13 said,<br />
&gt; Short, but not sweet. The RNC has nothing to say, but plenty to be read from the comment section.</p>
<p>It warms  my heart to see so many commenters agree with me that they have had it with the RNC and the GOP establishment.  I was feeling quite alone these last few months as I became more and more disillusioned with their lack of fight.  And their lack of fight is caused by their lack of principles.  They don&#8217;t know what their supposed conservatism is based on, because they haven&#8217;t thought about their principles.  They can&#8217;t explain their principles.  They can&#8217;t give a speech that fires you up because their belief in their own principles is so shallow.  They&#8217;re adrift and helpless.</p>
<p>You can only get so far muttering &#8220;lower taxes&#8221; over and over and over.  You have to know what your principles are, and you have to be able to explain them, before you can fight for them.   As Sadie closed her post:  We&#8217;re on our own.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll repeat Sadie&#8217;s link, too, in case you want to go read those refreshing comments:<br />
<a href="http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/1/486414.html" rel="nofollow">http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/1/486414.html</a></p>
<p>They don&#8217;t read the bills, they don&#8217;t fight against bad legislation.  They can&#8217;t give a speech if they&#8217;re lives depended on it.  All they want to do is raise more money for their own re-election.  In fact, it seems that that&#8217;s all they CAN do.  They&#8217;re ineffective at best, most likely they&#8217;re just plain stupid and incompetent, and at worst they&#8217;re mired in the entire DC swamp of complete corruption.  Yes, Virginia&#8230; all of D.C., including 95% of our GOP, CAN in fact be nothing more than completely corrupt.</p>
<p>Are the scales falling from our eyes, finally, as we perceive a basic truth?  Not only may Obama be exposing the hard left to all Americans to clearly see&#8230; he may be exposing the entire GOP, too, as a false, corrupt organization.   I urge all of you, as we head towards the 2010 elections, to put the GOP on trial in your heads.  If they don&#8217;t fight, and fight effectively, we should abandon them.  Because the principles of the fight have never been clearer.  The necessity of the fight has never been clearer.  If they can&#8217;t fight effectively NOW, given everything that is going on these days, they will never be able to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 403/404 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bookwormroom.com @ 2012-02-10 06:42:07 -->
