<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems try to slam Brown for hinting that Obama was born out of wedlock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86231</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86231</guid>
		<description>I say the above because the Republican establishment was rather soundly thrashed in 2006 and 2008, and now the Democrat establishment is about to be given the same message in 2010 and perhaps in 2012 as well.  It&#039;s breathtaking to me.  Simply astonishing.  That&#039;s why I say that I think something new - at least new in *our* experience and lifetime - is happening.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say the above because the Republican establishment was rather soundly thrashed in 2006 and 2008, and now the Democrat establishment is about to be given the same message in 2010 and perhaps in 2012 as well.  It&#8217;s breathtaking to me.  Simply astonishing.  That&#8217;s why I say that I think something new &#8211; at least new in *our* experience and lifetime &#8211; is happening.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86230</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86230</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it, I believe.  Scott Brown will do it.  Or rather, the Massachusetts voters are actually going to do it.  Who would EVER have thought this could happen?
 
The state that 250 years ago was known for its populist patriotism is going to engage in one huge shout out for another Massachusetts Miracle.  It&#039;s been 50 years since JFK was their worthy Son.  They&#039;re looking at this current crowd - in their own Senate, as their own Governor, in Washington D.C., and like all of us, they&#039;ve decided to cry out: &quot;Enough!&quot;
 
This is not a repudiation of the Democrats, nor a coronation of Republicans.  This is a battle cry against the entire establishment.  That&#039;s how I read it.  It&#039;s the tone-deaf elitism and cronyism and corruption and the out-and-out naked selling out for money and favors to gain a vote.  It&#039;s Martha Coakley, the Queen of the Massachusetts establishment,  briefly giving a hand-wave to her &quot;rabble&quot; before going off on vacation in the middle of the campaign.  &quot;Thank you, my dear rabble!  Now, off with you, I can&#039;t be bothered!&quot;  The Queen on the way to her Coronation... and the people have decided: &quot;Um... not so fast, oh Fake Queen. Not so fast.&quot;   And then her mindless gaffes...
 
And Brown ran a humble, sincere, &quot;I will represent YOU in Washington D.C.  I will stand for Massachusetts.&quot;  Which means I won&#039;t like him a whole lot, with me being very conservative and him, not so much.  But for me it&#039;s always been more about the corruption than other things.  I&#039;ve told my very liberal family over and over that the current Democrats in Washington are *not* the Roosevelt Democrats, not the JFK Democrats, not the Truman Democrats, who were worthy of respect even when you greatly disagreed with their politics.  Because back then, Democrats loved America for America herself, and they had honor, and they would never sell this country out for their own personal interests.  They would only go so far down certain roads.  This current crowd - on both sides of the aisle - is as corrupt as any Roman Senate could possibly ever have been, and I declare them HORRIFIC.   All of them.  Many in Massachusetts do not say they are Democrat - they say they are Independent.  Just as I say I am NOT a Republican, though I may be conservative. I&#039;ve got little use for the establishment.
 
It appears something big is happening.  And the first major shot is going to be heard tomorrow, just as it was heard 250 years ago, in Massachusetts.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s it, I believe.  Scott Brown will do it.  Or rather, the Massachusetts voters are actually going to do it.  Who would EVER have thought this could happen?<br />
 <br />
The state that 250 years ago was known for its populist patriotism is going to engage in one huge shout out for another Massachusetts Miracle.  It&#8217;s been 50 years since JFK was their worthy Son.  They&#8217;re looking at this current crowd &#8211; in their own Senate, as their own Governor, in Washington D.C., and like all of us, they&#8217;ve decided to cry out: &#8220;Enough!&#8221;<br />
 <br />
This is not a repudiation of the Democrats, nor a coronation of Republicans.  This is a battle cry against the entire establishment.  That&#8217;s how I read it.  It&#8217;s the tone-deaf elitism and cronyism and corruption and the out-and-out naked selling out for money and favors to gain a vote.  It&#8217;s Martha Coakley, the Queen of the Massachusetts establishment,  briefly giving a hand-wave to her &#8220;rabble&#8221; before going off on vacation in the middle of the campaign.  &#8221;Thank you, my dear rabble!  Now, off with you, I can&#8217;t be bothered!&#8221;  The Queen on the way to her Coronation&#8230; and the people have decided: &#8220;Um&#8230; not so fast, oh Fake Queen. Not so fast.&#8221;   And then her mindless gaffes&#8230;<br />
 <br />
And Brown ran a humble, sincere, &#8220;I will represent YOU in Washington D.C.  I will stand for Massachusetts.&#8221;  Which means I won&#8217;t like him a whole lot, with me being very conservative and him, not so much.  But for me it&#8217;s always been more about the corruption than other things.  I&#8217;ve told my very liberal family over and over that the current Democrats in Washington are *not* the Roosevelt Democrats, not the JFK Democrats, not the Truman Democrats, who were worthy of respect even when you greatly disagreed with their politics.  Because back then, Democrats loved America for America herself, and they had honor, and they would never sell this country out for their own personal interests.  They would only go so far down certain roads.  This current crowd &#8211; on both sides of the aisle &#8211; is as corrupt as any Roman Senate could possibly ever have been, and I declare them HORRIFIC.   All of them.  Many in Massachusetts do not say they are Democrat &#8211; they say they are Independent.  Just as I say I am NOT a Republican, though I may be conservative. I&#8217;ve got little use for the establishment.<br />
 <br />
It appears something big is happening.  And the first major shot is going to be heard tomorrow, just as it was heard 250 years ago, in Massachusetts.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Links to Visit &#8211; 01/18/10 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86211</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Links to Visit &#8211; 01/18/10 NoisyRoom.net: Where liberty dwells, there is my country&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86211</guid>
		<description>[...] Bookworm Room &#8211; Dems try to slam Brown for hinting that Obama was born out of wedlock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bookworm Room &#8211; Dems try to slam Brown for hinting that Obama was born out of wedlock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhombre</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86179</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhombre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86179</guid>
		<description>Of more concern to me is that while still in the womb the first words he heard were probably his father and mother practicing their Russian and discussing the evils of colonialism and U.S. hegemony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of more concern to me is that while still in the womb the first words he heard were probably his father and mother practicing their Russian and discussing the evils of colonialism and U.S. hegemony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhymes With Right</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86174</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhymes With Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86174</guid>
		<description>Just a minor detail for oldflyer.
 
Generally, children born in a marriage that is invalid because of bigamy or other reasons are not considered to be illegitimate.  That said, it would be fair to state that the circumstances of his birth were irregular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a minor detail for oldflyer.<br />
 <br />
Generally, children born in a marriage that is invalid because of bigamy or other reasons are not considered to be illegitimate.  That said, it would be fair to state that the circumstances of his birth were irregular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oldflyer</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86173</link>
		<dc:creator>Oldflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86173</guid>
		<description>Although it is tactfully seldom mentioned, it has seemed obvious all along that Obama was born out of wedlock.
It is generally acknowledged  that his father had multiple wives in Kenya when he was conceived.  Unless there is some waiver to our bigamy laws that apply to future politicians born in Hawaii, then it would have been a sham (and  presumably a misdemeanor, if not a felony) if his parents  had attempted to marry in Hawaii.  So, maybe someone should ask Obama what the real truth is.
Of course, the Dimocrats assume that the mere mention of the name Palin will turn people away from Brown.  I prefer to think that voters, having been badly bamboozled in 2008, will be careful about what they blindly accept-- at least for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it is tactfully seldom mentioned, it has seemed obvious all along that Obama was born out of wedlock.<br />
It is generally acknowledged  that his father had multiple wives in Kenya when he was conceived.  Unless there is some waiver to our bigamy laws that apply to future politicians born in Hawaii, then it would have been a sham (and  presumably a misdemeanor, if not a felony) if his parents  had attempted to marry in Hawaii.  So, maybe someone should ask Obama what the real truth is.<br />
Of course, the Dimocrats assume that the mere mention of the name Palin will turn people away from Brown.  I prefer to think that voters, having been badly bamboozled in 2008, will be careful about what they blindly accept&#8211; at least for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pst314</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2010/01/17/dems-try-to-slam-brown-for-hinting-that-obama-was-born-out-of-wedlock/comment-page-1/#comment-86171</link>
		<dc:creator>pst314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=10426#comment-86171</guid>
		<description>&quot;Every first year law student knows, truth is the best defense to a libel charge.&quot;
...Except in the Netherlands, or any other place ruled by leftists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Every first year law student knows, truth is the best defense to a libel charge.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;Except in the Netherlands, or any other place ruled by leftists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/11 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 352/353 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bookwormroom.com @ 2012-02-10 06:29:41 -->
