The real story behind the Tucson shooting

In the midst of this sublime and terrible storm [at Sidmouth, England], Dame Partington, who lived upon the beach, was seen at the door of her house with mop and pattens, trundling her mop, squeezing out the sea-water, and vigorously pushing away the Atlantic Ocean. The Atlantic was roused; Mrs. Partington’s spirit was up. But I need not tell you that the contest was unequal; the Atlantic Ocean beat Mrs. Partington.  — The Rev. Sydney Smith (1771-1845)

Today, I feel like Mrs. Partington, with the Leftist chattering classes standing in as the angry Atlantic.  You see, sadly, the real story about the shooting in Tucson isn’t the shooting at all.  The shooting — if you’ll pardon me for saying this in the face of a tragedy that took so many innocent lives and left a vibrant young woman, mother and Congressperson fighting her way back to neurological health — was a garden-variety act of madness.

Loughner’s writings and videos show that, although high functioning, he was almost certainly a paranoid schizophrenic.  In the Middle Ages, he would have been communing closely with God or the Devil, with a broom and black cat at his side.  In the 1950s, he would have raved about fluoride and Martians, all while nattily attired in a tin foil hat.

In our day, Loughner’s madness saw him seeking bizarre meanings in numbers and word patterns; revering books of antisemitism, violence and collectivism (Mein Kampf; The Communist Manifesto; Clockwork Orange); and gravitating towards fringe groups and ideas.  Most importantly, in a day and age when the famous are, collectively, our Gods, Devils and Martians, he did what John Hinckley, Mark Chapman, Arthur Richard Jackson, and Robert John Bardo did — he fixated on a celebrity, in this case a Blue Dog Dem, stalked her, and ultimately shot her, along with a large number of bystanders.  Nothing new here, although each insanely inspired act of violence carries with it its own share of grief and despair and, too, bravery and hope.

Looking beyond  the tragically ordinary mass murder, one discovers the actual story here:  the chattering class’s instant, concerted, deliberate effort to use a routine tragedy to destroy an American political party.  Facts were irrelevant:  Loughner’s manifest insanity and his Left wing affiliations were irrelevant.  What went out instantly, over the airways and the internet, through formal outlets and social networks, was a meme:  American conservatives, especially Sarah Palin, were guilty — guilty because they used the word “target,” or perhaps “cross hairs,” or even “reload” in their political discourse.  In a two party system, the chatters claimed, one of the parties was, by its very existence, an incitement to violence.

The speed with which this meme took hold was staggering.  Within one day, 50% of the liberals on my “real” facebook account were shrilly decrying “hate speech” and Sarah Palin, with many adding loving quotations from Keith (“worst person in the world”) Olbermann on the virtues of peaceful political discourse.  Pushback in the form of a reality check — Obama is especially adept at violent political imagery; Democrats love cross hair and target advertising; the violence in speech has actually declined since Leftist insanity against George Bush — was all irrelevant.  As my live-in liberal proudly informed me, Sarah Palin’s career is now dead in the water.  The facts don’t matter, he added; it’s enough that she’s been irremediably smeared.

We’ve seen this kind of thing before, of course.  The Nazis were masters of this type of smear politics; as were the Communists; as were the Tsarist Russians.  In other word, wherever you have totalitarianism, whether it’s theocratic, aristocratic, oligarchic or socialist (or some -ist or -ic I haven’t thought of), the first thing that happens is the corruption of facts and ideas, which often reaches its apex with deliberate efforts to twist common tragedies in order to smear political opponents.

My hope is that this time, for the first time in history, the presence of alternative media will prevent the ferocity of the falsehoods from taking root.  Never before have the totalitarian chattering classes had to cope with truly free speech.  They meme; we anti-meme.  They lie; we trumpet the truth.  They smear; we focus on core facts and preserve our ethics and dignity.

I started with a quotation from a great enlightenment thinker, Sydney Smith.  He charmingly recognized the futility of trying to sweep back an overwhelming force.  Maybe this time, though, rather than challenging the mighty Atlantic, we may discover that we’re facing the last fetid emanations from a draining swamp — and our efforts at sweep-back will prevail.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Pingback: Rubio in Washington; Heroes in AZ | Elizabeth Scalia()


    You have eloquently described what the State of Israel has been confronting.

  • Ymarsakar

    Americans are at the point where they are beginning to receive positively a leader with the power to terminate, permanently, politicians. And it is the Left, with their revolutionary rhetoric but lacking the guts to do anything (Ayers got real funny looking once that bomb blew out the brains of his associates) about it.
    Speaking personally, Sarah Palin ordering the political deaths of certain individuals, wouldn’t bother me in the least. It would, in fact, raise my level of respect for her determination.
    For example, it’s one thing for a Blue Dog to die. It’s another thing for Byrd or Ted Kennedy to have been offed.

  • Ymarsakar

    Maybe this time, though, rather than challenging the mighty Atlantic, we may discover that we’re facing the last fetid emanations from a draining swamp — and our efforts at sweep-back will prevail.

    The fate of nations are determined by key, decisive, and momentous battles. This is one such battle. Ultimate defeat is not determined either or, but the likelihood increases exponentially with each victory or loss.

  • suek

    By the way…I picked up somewhere that Gibbons is Jewish.  Does that play a part?  Maybe, considering the “Mein Kampf” choice.  Or maybe not.  He did apparently fasten on her for _some_ reason … but given his state of mind maybe it was for no reason – at least none that any of us could observe.


    Giffords is Jewish and so was her aide Gabe Zimmerman.  I don’t think there’s anyway to tell if or how much it played a part at this point. It did, however, cross my mind from the start. He was certainly fixated on her. She married in November 2007 (that’s when his fixation began) which would have made the killer about 19 and at the age when schizophrenia begins to rear its ugly head predominately in males.

  • suek

    Thanks for the correction, Sadie.
    And the info … as usual!


    Curiosity and retirement , suek, allow for the luxury of little details ;

  • Jose

    Foxnews has a telephone interview by Shepard Smith with the woman who, when Loughner was tackled, grabbed a pistol magazine from his hand and sat on his ankles to help restrain him.  The longer I listened, for almost 10 minutes, the more impressed I was by this brave woman.  She corrected Smith as to how the event transpired, did not magnify her own actions, and spoke objectively.  Then, at the very end she began to dump on Republicans and ramble about incitement.

    I was SO disappointed.