24h-payday

May I suggest a different way to phrase those headlines?

At about 4:30 PST, two headlines just came down the pike, following the Wisconsin Senate votes:

Wisconsin anti-union measure must pass Assembly before it can go to Gov. Walker for signature

More on Wisconsin anti-union vote: No Democratic senators were present – AP

I’d like to rephrase them:

Wisconsin pro-taxpayer measure must pass Assembly before it can go to Gov. Walker for signature

More on Wisconsin pro-taxpayer vote:  No Democratic senators were present — AP

Once again, the liberals are framing the debate, aren’t they?

Be Sociable, Share!
Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

8 Responses to “May I suggest a different way to phrase those headlines?”

  1. on 09 Mar 2011 at 6:40 pm Charles Martel

    Maybe. There’s just not that many people anymore who take being called “anti-union” as an insult. Most people these days when they think “unions,” especially government ones, think of tapeworms.

  2. on 09 Mar 2011 at 7:37 pm Cheesestick

    How about “No Democrats showed up for work again for the ump-teenth day in a row”?

  3. on 09 Mar 2011 at 9:23 pm bizcor

    On Wisconsin, On Wisconsin….Governor Walker has my heartfelt praise. Enough is enough… The Democrats shirked their duty…They fled in order to give the issue a lot of press time to the unions to bemoan the bill. I salute Governor Walker and the Wisconsin Senate Republicans for coming up with a solution. Agreed they still have no budget because no money votes can be passed without a quorum however non money votes can. Now let’s see how the Wisconsin electorate feels. This has given other state’s legislatures a game plan. Budgets must be cut spending must be stopped.
    That’s my take..
     

  4. on 10 Mar 2011 at 4:00 am CollegeCon

    Lets be honest, the bill IS anti-Union.  The only question here is whether or not that is in fact a bad thing.
     
    What I would REALLY like to know is how many of the protesters are actual Wisconsin residents, as it wouldn’t surprise me to learn that a good proportion are not.  Still, the real test of whether this is truly the will of the people will be in the next election.

  5. on 10 Mar 2011 at 4:04 am Ymarsakar

    Lets be honest, the bill IS anti-Union

    Since when was a bill against public sector unions, also against private sector unions, eh

  6. on 10 Mar 2011 at 8:46 am suek

    A bit about those protesters…
     
    http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/02/ny-unions-bus-in-hundreds-of-protesters-to-madison/

  7. on 10 Mar 2011 at 11:03 am bizcor

    suek that was an outstanding piece! The photo is pricless! I am going to share this with others. The MSM will never show it so it is up to us to do so.

  8. on 10 Mar 2011 at 12:29 pm SADIE

    The photo exemplifies union bloat and the link below, which is an email (threat) sent to all the Republican senators should go viral.
     
    http://www.620wtmj.com/news/local/117732923.html

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.