Comments on: Did Republicans win or lose on the budget?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:08:45 +0000

Most of the time the regulars aren’t fired up enough to argue or debate (with each other). But when it does happen, you get the friction of interstellar bodies in motion. Deshou?

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:07:49 +0000

I got to say Book, Bkwormroom has some interesting analysts.

Not that this was new, but it came to mind when rereading this entire post and comment lunch box.

By: Earl

Earl — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:12:29 +0000

Thanks for posting that, Sadie….

John Boehner promised to “fight”. If what the leadership did in the 2011 “budget deal” was how they define a “fight’ then we need new leadership. He promised to stop the Federal funding of abortion, and then they folded like an old tent.

If they truly meant it about “fighting”, someone from the GOP would have been out there telling the American people something like this: “My fellow Americans, your President swears that he will veto the agreement if it has a clause promising to pay the military in the case of a shutdown. He also says that he will not accept any agreement that withdraws funding from Planned Parenthood, 90% of whose services to pregnant women consist of abortion. The Republicans say that we consider paying the fighting men and women of this nation to be a much higher priority than the Federal funding of abortion services. We invite the President to join us.”

PRIMARY OPPONENTS FOR EVERY REPUBLICAN WHO VOTES FOR THE $352 MILLION BUDGET CUT

ELECT TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVES

STOP THE SPENDING

By: SADIE

SADIE — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:50:47 +0000

Earl and Oldflyer Does this settle it for you - it does for me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHCiSqxT-As&feature=player_embedded#at=55

By: Earl

Earl — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:37:03 +0000

What Ymarsakar said, folks. THROW THE B*****DS OUT! VOTE FOR TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVES IN EVERY REPUBLICAN PRIMARY STOP THE SPENDING!!

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 02:02:39 +0000

and the TP needs to concentrate on exerting maximum influence on the GOP The most convenient, effective, and efficient way to achieve that would be to purge the Old Guard of the GOP and replace them with TP loyalists. That means the ideologically impure are either going out or they're going to have to pick sides for once.

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:58:53 +0000

(Pardon my French) Danny and Martel, will you pardon his French for him?

By: SADIE

SADIE — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:42:41 +0000

Don’t fret, Earl – we’ll teach’em a lesson November 2012.

TAKE NO PRISONERS – YOU HAVE TO CLOTHE AND FEED THEM

By: Earl

Earl — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:07:23 +0000

Well, folks….who is volunteering to follow the GOP “Leadership” over THIS cliff? (I’ll be honest – I thought it was Iowahawk or The Onion, when I first saw this announced. It’s not.)

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/04/13/cbo-last-weeks-38-billion-budget-deal-only-reduces-this-years-deficit-by-352-million/

CBO: Last week’s $38 billion budget deal only reduces this year’s deficit by … $352 million; Update: GOP leaders lobbying for votes

Hanging is too good for these people.

PRIMARY OPPONENTS FOR ANYONE WHO VOTES FOR THIS DEAL!

TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVES ONLY

STOP THE (D**N) SPENDING! (Pardon my French)

By: Ymarsakar

Ymarsakar — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:50:23 +0000

Using what Old said as a template, that this is a victory, then how many more victories will we need to beat ObamaCare? If ObamaCare is a quarter of the 1 trillion budget the Dems crafted like an ulcer upon the body of America, and 40 billion in cuts were achieved by the GOP this year, how many more years will we need before 500 billion can be cut.

And are we supposed to wait 12 years for the Left to finish consolidating their power, before providing them with a nation that is flush, once again, with cash so they can spend it more later?