Reply brief open thread
Bookworm on May 05 2011 at 8:22 am | Filed under: Open Threads
Legal work is going to keep me busy this morning, as I have a filing deadline. Before I open this open thread, though, I just have to bow down before jj, whose lovely listing of the inconsistencies in the Administration’s bin Laden stories got me more links than I can count.
As often as not, it doesn’t matter whether you, yourself, have talent. What matters is recognizing when those around you have talented — and then capitalizing on that knowledge! 
I am singularly blessed when it comes to the talent that has come to this blog and I thank all of you for your contributions.
Email This Post To A Friend
11 Responses to “Reply brief open thread”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Thought I would drop this here. The Volokh Conspiracy » Location, Location, Location Poor grammar besmirches the US Navy Seals on first reading.
“Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.”
JKB,
That’s funny.
“Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.”
Is that a Freudian slip?
Maybe they meant the president of Pah-kee-stahn?
If that story, JKB< is true, then it corroborates the scenario that the technical glitch was intentional and that the SEALs, regardless of White House attempts to safeguard Osama, was going on a kill mission regardless.
Is that a Freudian slip?
They’re Navy Seals – shouldn’t that be a Freudian ship.
I withdraw my offer of plural marriage to SADIE.
I’ll cancel the burka bridal dress – it was a taqui offer anyway.
“taqui offer”? Heck, Sadie, if polyamory becomes legal, I’ll marry you!
SADIE, you were going to fit in so well between Rafida and Thawab, my two honies from that ceremony in 2008. It would have been glorious.
Rafida and Thawab? taqui offer? just like a burka, they go “over my head.”