Comments on: Reply brief open thread http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/ Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:26:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Charles http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-121038 Charles Sat, 07 May 2011 14:25:45 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-121038 Rafida and Thawab? taqui offer? just like a burka, they go “over my head.”

]]> By: Charles Martel http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120985 Charles Martel Fri, 06 May 2011 18:21:45 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120985 SADIE, you were going to fit in so well between Rafida and Thawab, my two honies from that ceremony in 2008. It would have been glorious.

]]> By: Bookworm http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120980 Bookworm Fri, 06 May 2011 17:26:35 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120980 “taqui offer”? Heck, Sadie, if polyamory becomes legal, I’ll marry you!

]]> By: SADIE http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120966 SADIE Fri, 06 May 2011 15:50:54 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120966 I’ll cancel the burka bridal dress – it was a taqui offer anyway.

]]> By: Charles Martel http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120957 Charles Martel Fri, 06 May 2011 06:57:07 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120957 I withdraw my offer of plural marriage to SADIE.

]]> By: SADIE http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120955 SADIE Fri, 06 May 2011 05:25:28 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120955 Is that a Freudian slip?
 
They’re Navy Seals – shouldn’t that be a Freudian ship.
 
 

]]> By: Ymarsakar http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120954 Ymarsakar Fri, 06 May 2011 04:19:52 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120954 If that story, JKB< is true, then it corroborates the scenario that the technical glitch was intentional and that the SEALs, regardless of White House attempts to safeguard Osama, was going on a kill mission regardless.

]]> By: Charles Martel http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120953 Charles Martel Fri, 06 May 2011 03:22:55 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120953 Maybe they meant the president of Pah-kee-stahn?

]]> By: Charles http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120952 Charles Fri, 06 May 2011 03:14:08 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120952 “Mr Panetta also told the network that the US Navy Seals made the final decision to kill bin Laden rather than the president.”

Is that a Freudian slip?

]]> By: BrianE http://www.bookwormroom.com/2011/05/05/reply-brief-open-thread/comment-page-1/#comment-120946 BrianE Fri, 06 May 2011 02:19:57 +0000 http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=16992#comment-120946 JKB,
That’s funny.

]]>