Slaves aren’t allowed to. That is what makes them slaves. They don’t get a slave. Why, if they got a slave, that would break the class system. 

To accept this accusation – as it currently stands – as deserving TOTAL credibility, is utterly dishonorable on his part.

What does he know that we don’t know. He should put up or shut up.  Since he doesn’t know anything that we don’t know, he should SHUT THE HELL UP.  Because he doesn’t know.  It’s despicable.
 

I admire Karl Rove as a brilliant strategist, so I listen carefully to what he says…with a big grain of salt.

The problem with Karl Rove is two-fold: 1) he sees politics as a game that should be limited to Washington insiders and 2) he isn’t candid about who he is supporting (who is paying his bills?) while he undermines any potential challengers. Whenever I listen to his analysis, I always ask myself, “what’s his agenda on this point?”.

The RINO Establishment is certainly piling on gleefully.  Within 24 hours of these unsupported, anonymous allegations that require a lot more corroboration to be considered serious.  Thank you for showing your true colors, RINO Establishment.  Especially Karl Rove. To HELL with you.
 

Similarly, the Republican candidates to whom the MSM cozies up the most are the ones that we should be most careful to avoid. Witness John McCain.

Yeah, the title of the movie and the co-star is a bit off topic, but the topic is just so g-d disgusting. The farther along we get in just about everything, the dumber Liberals get and the more people they manage to drag down with them with their insatiable quest for the ultimate stupidity.

I was asked on the first day of History of Modern Art class how far back we should look for modern art and I said, “Two, maybe three years.” Got a laugh and recognition from the instructor who used that idea in following years to great effect. In the case of Liberals, history only starts 5 minutes ago, but only if it’s convenient.

In 2008, during the presidential primary campaign, I wrote two posts about the history Democrats don’t want people to know - Civil Rights History Democrats Don’t Want You to Know and More History Democrats Don’t Want You to Know. Liberal friends and family read both pieces, said, ‘Huh! I didn’t know that!’ and promptly forgot everything they’d just learned just proving once again you can lead a horse to water and you can even make him drink, but you cannot take the blinders from the eyes of a Liberal.   

Ok…so who/what’s the source of the information?

I heard – over the weekend – a statement that it was a Democrat source, and then heard that “oh no…not us – it was the Romney/Perry campaign”.

So, for me, first comes the credibility issue, then comes the issue of the source.

I’m inclined to dismiss the accusations – but I’d sure like to know who the sources are – especially if there are non-disclosure agreements. That might mean that somebody is breaking the disclosure barrier, although it could be a co-worker who didn’t exactly appreciate _something_ about Cain. Disgruntled employee??

Actually, given that Times report, I’d like to know more about the source. It’s to be expected that if someone comes in with the job of making major changes, somebody’s going to get bent out of shape. When it happens, is that a good thing or a bad thing? Some people carry grudges a _long_ time…