<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A debate about young people&#8217;s behavior at CPAC highlights our culture&#8217;s inability to distinguish between things that are sexy and things that are vulgar.  *UPDATED*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-140106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-140106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/315869/20120318/obama-agency-rules-pepsi-s-use-aborted.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/315869/20120318/obama-agency-rules-pepsi-s-use-aborted.htm

How about make a profit, stop talking about values. Because corporations allied with government need not even listen &lt;/a&gt;to their shareholders when Obama says that the shareholders are wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/315869/20120318/obama-agency-rules-pepsi-s-use-aborted.htm" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/315869/20120318/obama-agency-rules-pepsi-s-use-aborted.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/315869/20120318/obama-agency-rules-pepsi-s-use-aborted.htm</a></p>
<p>How about make a profit, stop talking about values. Because corporations allied with government need not even listen to their shareholders when Obama says that the shareholders are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138991</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, Libby, you are right.  And Rousseau knew it, too.  To destroy the bourgeoisie, you must destroy our institutions, which convey our values. In his day, not everyone went to school, but they nearly all went to church. Bipolars may be crazy, but are rarely stupid, e.g. Rousseau.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Libby, you are right.  And Rousseau knew it, too.  To destroy the bourgeoisie, you must destroy our institutions, which convey our values. In his day, not everyone went to school, but they nearly all went to church. Bipolars may be crazy, but are rarely stupid, e.g. Rousseau.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Btw, those people Indigo Red linked to, aren&#039;t the &quot;Progressive masterminds&quot; and dastardly evil doers either. They don&#039;t know what they support, the true nature. And this matters because...? It doesn&#039;t, evil cannon fodder does as evil wishes. It doesn&#039;t matter if they &quot;know&quot; or not, that their ultimate consequences are essentially harmful. If they get paid for education and get elevated to &quot;Educated class&quot;, that&#039;s enough for their Faust deal.

Try to change their minds, why don&#039;t you. See if you can do that. If you can&#039;t, you&#039;re not going to change the minds of blacks or other Democrat house slaves. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, those people Indigo Red linked to, aren&#8217;t the &#8220;Progressive masterminds&#8221; and dastardly evil doers either. They don&#8217;t know what they support, the true nature. And this matters because&#8230;? It doesn&#8217;t, evil cannon fodder does as evil wishes. It doesn&#8217;t matter if they &#8220;know&#8221; or not, that their ultimate consequences are essentially harmful. If they get paid for education and get elevated to &#8220;Educated class&#8221;, that&#8217;s enough for their Faust deal.</p>
<p>Try to change their minds, why don&#8217;t you. See if you can do that. If you can&#8217;t, you&#8217;re not going to change the minds of blacks or other Democrat house slaves. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indigo Red</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138982</link>
		<dc:creator>Indigo Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And then there&#039;s this story from Miami about college women using a website - www.seekingarraingement.com - to find men who will finance their college educations in exchange for sex. But please, don&#039;t call it prostitution because the participants are building a relationship.

  
&lt;a title=&quot;Financial Sex Aid: Florida Co-Eds Seek &quot;Sugar Daddy&quot; for College Degree&quot; href=&quot;http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/02/14/financial-sex-aid-florida-co-eds-seek-sugar-daddy-for-college-degree/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Financial Sex Aid: Florida Co-Eds Seek &quot;Sugar Daddy&quot; for College Degree&lt;/a&gt;

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then there&#8217;s this story from Miami about college women using a website &#8211; <a href="http://www.seekingarraingement.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.seekingarraingement.com</a> &#8211; to find men who will finance their college educations in exchange for sex. But please, don&#8217;t call it prostitution because the participants are building a relationship.</p>
<p>  <br />
<a title="Financial Sex Aid: Florida Co-Eds Seek &quot;Sugar Daddy&quot; for College Degree" href="http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/02/14/financial-sex-aid-florida-co-eds-seek-sugar-daddy-for-college-degree/" rel="nofollow">Financial Sex Aid: Florida Co-Eds Seek &#8220;Sugar Daddy&#8221; for College Degree</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138981</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Adams - I think the key to finding more of those needles in the haystack is in the beginning of your post: &quot;&lt;strong&gt;Last Sunday, during coffee hour&lt;/strong&gt;...&quot;. There are all kinds of interesting and stable kids at my church and I&#039;m guessing that this is common at every church and synagogue. 
I grew up in Boulder in the 70&#039;s &amp; 80&#039;s, so there were a great many opportunities for me and my siblings to go astray (sadly, many of our childhood friends are still trying to &quot;find themselves&quot;). Having fabulous parents who didn&#039;t divorce was the main reason all of us turned out OK, but a close second was our involvement in church. Eventhough it was a fairly liberal church (this was Boulder), the values it taught us, and the vast network of all kinds of interesting, caring people it brought into our lives made it much easier to skip temptations like drugs. It also reinforced the idea of formality (including formal attire) and behaving in way that fits the occasion on a weekly basis - something that is missing lately. ALso taught us that there are things bigger than ourselves (and our own lives, needs, etc.). What is sleazy attire in search of sex if not the pursuit of instant gratification?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Adams &#8211; I think the key to finding more of those needles in the haystack is in the beginning of your post: &#8220;<strong>Last Sunday, during coffee hour</strong>&#8230;&#8221;. There are all kinds of interesting and stable kids at my church and I&#8217;m guessing that this is common at every church and synagogue.<br />
I grew up in Boulder in the 70&#8242;s &amp; 80&#8242;s, so there were a great many opportunities for me and my siblings to go astray (sadly, many of our childhood friends are still trying to &#8220;find themselves&#8221;). Having fabulous parents who didn&#8217;t divorce was the main reason all of us turned out OK, but a close second was our involvement in church. Eventhough it was a fairly liberal church (this was Boulder), the values it taught us, and the vast network of all kinds of interesting, caring people it brought into our lives made it much easier to skip temptations like drugs. It also reinforced the idea of formality (including formal attire) and behaving in way that fits the occasion on a weekly basis &#8211; something that is missing lately. ALso taught us that there are things bigger than ourselves (and our own lives, needs, etc.). What is sleazy attire in search of sex if not the pursuit of instant gratification?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, there&#039;s plenty of people living great lives in America. Evil, however, is not about killing everyone. First, it&#039;s about enslaving everyone. So even if you live a good life, you&#039;ll be doing it in service of somebody else: the Master.
 It gets to that point after a critical point is crossed. 

The LEft did a lot of infiltration in the 60s. Funded by, who else, the Soviets. With that much money, they could finally implement a lot of things which they just couldn&#039;t do previously as simple unfunded domestic terrorists and eugenicists.

America seems to think they beat the Soviets. Until they beat the Left, they haven&#039;t beaten the Soviet legacy just yet. The Leftist alliance is essentially a left over super weapon that the Soviets didn&#039;t have the opportunity to use at WWWIII. Now it&#039;s a rogue super weapon, doing whatever it wants. Mainly making butt loads of money for itself and its members. Money, which coincidentally, comes from taxes and federal printing and laundering of Benjamins.


So evil is fine with people living great lives. So long as they obey the true Masters of this Earth. Being the Leftist elites.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, there&#8217;s plenty of people living great lives in America. Evil, however, is not about killing everyone. First, it&#8217;s about enslaving everyone. So even if you live a good life, you&#8217;ll be doing it in service of somebody else: the Master.<br />
 It gets to that point after a critical point is crossed. </p>
<p>The LEft did a lot of infiltration in the 60s. Funded by, who else, the Soviets. With that much money, they could finally implement a lot of things which they just couldn&#8217;t do previously as simple unfunded domestic terrorists and eugenicists.</p>
<p>America seems to think they beat the Soviets. Until they beat the Left, they haven&#8217;t beaten the Soviet legacy just yet. The Leftist alliance is essentially a left over super weapon that the Soviets didn&#8217;t have the opportunity to use at WWWIII. Now it&#8217;s a rogue super weapon, doing whatever it wants. Mainly making butt loads of money for itself and its members. Money, which coincidentally, comes from taxes and federal printing and laundering of Benjamins.</p>
<p>So evil is fine with people living great lives. So long as they obey the true Masters of this Earth. Being the Leftist elites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138970</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are web sites,  which you have mentioned, and, now, Facebook pages, too, in which young &quot;men&quot; encourage one another in pursuing reptilian sexual morals.  They say that women show no evidence of any sort of moral virtue, no loyalty, nothing beyond the hookup, so  they try to make the best of the situation, which favors the boys&#039;  biological nature anyway.
 
Lat Sunday, during coffee hour, I was talking about grown kids with a man about my late father&#039;s age, and he said, &quot;It&#039;s hard to raise kids in this day and age.&quot;  I realized, and blurted out, &quot;Jamie is not doing that!&quot;My son is living up to a higher standard than my grandparents.  He married at nineteen, had his first son at twenty one, and now there&#039;s the third child on the way. Their social life revolves around their church, and their oldest son&#039;s home school group, and his parents. His wife, marrying early because he would not do the deed unless she did, says, now, that girls today have no knowledge or background to tell them what men/women relationships ought to be, except maybe television and movies.. (My wife and I have often said so, but never to her.)
 
We can&#039;t be the only ones. In spite of the barnyard morality that oozes over us from the media, there must be some people out there who are getting it mostly right.  Certainly Bubba and Cissy Bookworm seem to be on the right track, and the LeMieux kids, and at least one of their friends.  I always say that, if you find a needle in a hay stack, it is a fairly safe bet that that hay stack is full of needles. 
 
Part of the problem, and it is the link between &quot;social&quot; and &quot;fiscal&quot; Conservatism, is that the Government is subsidizing this  appalling social deterioration, and has done so for forty five years.  &quot;When you find yourself in a hole...&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are web sites,  which you have mentioned, and, now, Facebook pages, too, in which young &#8220;men&#8221; encourage one another in pursuing reptilian sexual morals.  They say that women show no evidence of any sort of moral virtue, no loyalty, nothing beyond the hookup, so  they try to make the best of the situation, which favors the boys&#8217;  biological nature anyway.<br />
 <br />
Lat Sunday, during coffee hour, I was talking about grown kids with a man about my late father&#8217;s age, and he said, &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to raise kids in this day and age.&#8221;  I realized, and blurted out, &#8220;Jamie is not doing that!&#8221;My son is living up to a higher standard than my grandparents.  He married at nineteen, had his first son at twenty one, and now there&#8217;s the third child on the way. Their social life revolves around their church, and their oldest son&#8217;s home school group, and his parents. His wife, marrying early because he would not do the deed unless she did, says, now, that girls today have no knowledge or background to tell them what men/women relationships ought to be, except maybe television and movies.. (My wife and I have often said so, but never to her.)<br />
 <br />
We can&#8217;t be the only ones. In spite of the barnyard morality that oozes over us from the media, there must be some people out there who are getting it mostly right.  Certainly Bubba and Cissy Bookworm seem to be on the right track, and the LeMieux kids, and at least one of their friends.  I always say that, if you find a needle in a hay stack, it is a fairly safe bet that that hay stack is full of needles.<br />
 <br />
Part of the problem, and it is the link between &#8220;social&#8221; and &#8220;fiscal&#8221; Conservatism, is that the Government is subsidizing this  appalling social deterioration, and has done so for forty five years.  &#8220;When you find yourself in a hole&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beefrank</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138964</link>
		<dc:creator>beefrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bw: I know you were not slamming CPAC.  Unfortunately, the root of most cultural ills in the 21st Century began with in the 60&#039;s &#039;free love&#039; and &#039;civil rights&#039; movements.  In my opinion, that is when the &#039;special&#039; tag was attached to skin color, gender, sexual acts, hair style, economic status, clothing and drug use.  It is when language was maligned to euphemize and standardize abnormal social behavior on many fronts. Lucid, non-chemical thinking became &#039;square&#039;, &#039;unadventurous&#039; &#039;limited&#039; and &#039;freedom-less&#039;; Good grades became &#039;playing by the Man&#039;s rules&#039;; Monogamous (married and unmarried) relationships were &#039;limiting&#039;, &#039;rigid&#039;, &#039;static&#039; and &#039;boring&#039;; Modest dress and inhibited public behavior was &#039;prudish&#039;, &#039;puritanical&#039;, &#039;uptight&#039;, &#039;straight&#039;, &#039;frigid&#039; and &#039;expressionless&#039;.  As a result, truancy, dropouts, sexual crimes and pedophilia, social diseases, illegitimacy, abortions, infertility problems, suicides(e.g. Golden Gate Bridge stats), drug abuses and divorces have increased. The grown 60s adolescence and some children whose &#039;stunted&#039; maturity are now in power affecting social policies as evident in the Clinton, Obama and Brown administrations. However, there are many 60s kids who grew up influenced by the &#039;freedom&#039; mantra but matured, became conservatives, thanks to William F. Buckley, and participated in the Reagan revolution. Even the 60s radical, Jerry Rubin, shed his &#039;distrust anyone over 30&#039; rhetoric to become a successful Wall Street businessman preaching &#039;wealth creation is the real American revolution&#039;. My confidence in America&#039;s future grows when I see individuals like Abby Johnson, Lila Rose, James O&#039;Keefe and many others of the &#039;YouTube&#039;, &#039;Twitter&#039; generation attacking the Left with intensity and smart tactics.  After the Reagan revolution, Rush Limbaugh on AM radio, Brent Bozell on print media and Fox News on television created the &#039;push back&#039; and balance against the liberal agendas I experienced with ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, Rolling Stone, Marin IJ and San Francisco Chronicle world.  Free at last, free at last, thank God we are free at last.  It is interesting to note how many children and grandchildren of the 60&#039;s generation have rejected the politics and &#039;hippie&#039; ideals of their pot-smoking, swinging, divorced (grand)parents to become conservatives in their lifestyle choices and politics. What is the phrase about &#039;payback&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bw: I know you were not slamming CPAC.  Unfortunately, the root of most cultural ills in the 21st Century began with in the 60&#8242;s &#8216;free love&#8217; and &#8216;civil rights&#8217; movements.  In my opinion, that is when the &#8216;special&#8217; tag was attached to skin color, gender, sexual acts, hair style, economic status, clothing and drug use.  It is when language was maligned to euphemize and standardize abnormal social behavior on many fronts. Lucid, non-chemical thinking became &#8216;square&#8217;, &#8216;unadventurous&#8217; &#8216;limited&#8217; and &#8216;freedom-less&#8217;; Good grades became &#8216;playing by the Man&#8217;s rules&#8217;; Monogamous (married and unmarried) relationships were &#8216;limiting&#8217;, &#8216;rigid&#8217;, &#8216;static&#8217; and &#8216;boring&#8217;; Modest dress and inhibited public behavior was &#8216;prudish&#8217;, &#8216;puritanical&#8217;, &#8216;uptight&#8217;, &#8216;straight&#8217;, &#8216;frigid&#8217; and &#8216;expressionless&#8217;.  As a result, truancy, dropouts, sexual crimes and pedophilia, social diseases, illegitimacy, abortions, infertility problems, suicides(e.g. Golden Gate Bridge stats), drug abuses and divorces have increased. The grown 60s adolescence and some children whose &#8216;stunted&#8217; maturity are now in power affecting social policies as evident in the Clinton, Obama and Brown administrations. However, there are many 60s kids who grew up influenced by the &#8216;freedom&#8217; mantra but matured, became conservatives, thanks to William F. Buckley, and participated in the Reagan revolution. Even the 60s radical, Jerry Rubin, shed his &#8216;distrust anyone over 30&#8242; rhetoric to become a successful Wall Street businessman preaching &#8216;wealth creation is the real American revolution&#8217;. My confidence in America&#8217;s future grows when I see individuals like Abby Johnson, Lila Rose, James O&#8217;Keefe and many others of the &#8216;YouTube&#8217;, &#8216;Twitter&#8217; generation attacking the Left with intensity and smart tactics.  After the Reagan revolution, Rush Limbaugh on AM radio, Brent Bozell on print media and Fox News on television created the &#8216;push back&#8217; and balance against the liberal agendas I experienced with ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, NPR, Rolling Stone, Marin IJ and San Francisco Chronicle world.  Free at last, free at last, thank God we are free at last.  It is interesting to note how many children and grandchildren of the 60&#8242;s generation have rejected the politics and &#8216;hippie&#8217; ideals of their pot-smoking, swinging, divorced (grand)parents to become conservatives in their lifestyle choices and politics. What is the phrase about &#8216;payback&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138960</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, when my daughter was just starting out in High School, a neighbor, the mother of one my daughter&#039;s school mates, was haranguing her daughter about the &quot;importance&quot; of look appealing to the boys by wearing revealing clothing and that her object should be to try to get as many boy friends as she could. While I was listening to this open mouthed, the girl just turned around to her mother and exploded, saying, &quot;Great Mom, the word for what you are describing is called a F*buddy. Is that what you want me to become?&quot;. 

The young lady was obviously far more mature than her mother. Now, after college, I believe and my daughter confirms that she turned out just fine, although I believe she is still on frosty terms with her mother. I am still proud of that young lady for that moment in time where she stood up for herself. Sad to say, she was more the exception than the rule in the trashy upper-middle class boomer culture we inhabit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, when my daughter was just starting out in High School, a neighbor, the mother of one my daughter&#8217;s school mates, was haranguing her daughter about the &#8220;importance&#8221; of look appealing to the boys by wearing revealing clothing and that her object should be to try to get as many boy friends as she could. While I was listening to this open mouthed, the girl just turned around to her mother and exploded, saying, &#8220;Great Mom, the word for what you are describing is called a F*buddy. Is that what you want me to become?&#8221;. </p>
<p>The young lady was obviously far more mature than her mother. Now, after college, I believe and my daughter confirms that she turned out just fine, although I believe she is still on frosty terms with her mother. I am still proud of that young lady for that moment in time where she stood up for herself. Sad to say, she was more the exception than the rule in the trashy upper-middle class boomer culture we inhabit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ymarsakar</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/02/15/a-debate-about-young-peoples-behavior-at-cpac-highlights-our-cultures-inability-to-distinguish-between-things-that-are-sexy-and-things-that-are-vulgar/comment-page-1/#comment-138957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ymarsakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=21435#comment-138957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood can turn any woman into a whore, via star power and the circle jerk. The Left can also turn your daughters into whores, if you let them. Such is the corrupting power of evil. It taints anything it touches.

Of course, popular American culture does not affect me. I prefer popular Japanese culture instead. It&#039;s a lot more sane to begin with. Knowing the Japanese, that&#039;s saying something.

 &lt;strong&gt;No, you don’t &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to be in a business suit with pearls.&lt;/strong&gt;

Just for the women out there, I do think a business suit, cut  to the female form, is actually very attractive. I prefer the skirt to seeing women in pants, of course. But both can work, depending on the environment. For some reason though, I think a lot of males prefer the &quot;younger&quot; look. Meaning anything like cheerleader or school girl outfits that make the woman look &quot;younger&quot;. I&#039;m one of those people who prefer women who are wiser and more mature, however. This was true even back in high school.


I once wore a golden-beige vest, white under shirt, and black/beige formal pants to physics class one day. I got A LOT of strange looks. Until eventually someone asked me &quot;why&#039;d you come wearing that&quot;. And I&#039;m like &quot;cause I felt like it&quot;. Technically, I thought it was nice looking hanging on the closet wall and I wanted to try it out. man, back in those days, had no clue about social rules or repercussions. Half the reason people were staring is because of the novelty. The other half is because I can pick out what looks good. Color coordination perhaps appealed to the females.

 Now in this day and age, that would make me the REBEL, instead. And all of those wearing crazy mish mashes would be the &quot;conformists&quot;. How crazy is that?

 I don&#039;t think it&#039;s due entirely to the performers on this decadence issue. They aren&#039;t evil. They are just victims of the true evil. The capitalists MAKING MONEY OFF OF HOLLYWOOD WHORING. You get it? You see, the &quot;money makers&quot; are the evil ones, because they benefit the most and propagate it the most. Sure, performers get &quot;some&quot; money... but have you ever taken a hard look at their contracts? Where do you think MOST of the money from this stuff is actually going? See, most people don&#039;t even know it. They don&#039;t even know where the blood money is going. All they know is that performers get some of it, the face of evil, and that&#039;s it. That&#039;s not looking to the source of evil here, people. You&#039;re not going to stop Hollywood capitalism by looking at their cannonfodder stooges, the ones that &quot;burn out&quot; from imbibing too much evil.

One of the interesting things about courtship which I only recently started to understand, is how saying you love someone is cheap. Proving it by words and deeds, is something else entirely. Since a man is composed of actions, not words, it&#039;s important for a young male to show that he is a man, by actually doing something to back up his claims.So if he doesn&#039;t have to do anything about it, to back up much of anything, then he doesn&#039;t get much practice being a man. So he turns out to be a sissy boy, somebody weak that the rest of us can crush or make into a slave. Zombie. There was this phrase that I never really understood which becomes appropriate here. &quot;He looks like someone I want to beat up and take his lunch money&quot;. Which makes no sense to me, but for some reason people in the South and stuff sometimes say it and I hear it. But you get the picture.



The people who get the most money from Hollywood pay the most in lobbyists and bribes to government. So if you just think this is a &quot;moral&quot; issue or a fashion one... you are dead one. Hollywood evil directly funds DC evil which shuts down your civil liberties. So don&#039;t think this is about morality. This is about power and totalitarian success. Evil leads to power, using immorality and temptation. It works. People who only know about this from preachers and bibles just don&#039;t get it. They don&#039;t get it. They have never seen the elephant.

 
In conclusion, the Left is evil, all they touch is evil, and if you don&#039;t want to turn into a zombie, practice some self-discipline otherwise you won&#039;t become a man or woman: just a slave. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood can turn any woman into a whore, via star power and the circle jerk. The Left can also turn your daughters into whores, if you let them. Such is the corrupting power of evil. It taints anything it touches.</p>
<p>Of course, popular American culture does not affect me. I prefer popular Japanese culture instead. It&#8217;s a lot more sane to begin with. Knowing the Japanese, that&#8217;s saying something.</p>
<p> <strong>No, you don’t <em>have</em> to be in a business suit with pearls.</strong></p>
<p>Just for the women out there, I do think a business suit, cut  to the female form, is actually very attractive. I prefer the skirt to seeing women in pants, of course. But both can work, depending on the environment. For some reason though, I think a lot of males prefer the &#8220;younger&#8221; look. Meaning anything like cheerleader or school girl outfits that make the woman look &#8220;younger&#8221;. I&#8217;m one of those people who prefer women who are wiser and more mature, however. This was true even back in high school.</p>
<p>I once wore a golden-beige vest, white under shirt, and black/beige formal pants to physics class one day. I got A LOT of strange looks. Until eventually someone asked me &#8220;why&#8217;d you come wearing that&#8221;. And I&#8217;m like &#8220;cause I felt like it&#8221;. Technically, I thought it was nice looking hanging on the closet wall and I wanted to try it out. man, back in those days, had no clue about social rules or repercussions. Half the reason people were staring is because of the novelty. The other half is because I can pick out what looks good. Color coordination perhaps appealed to the females.</p>
<p> Now in this day and age, that would make me the REBEL, instead. And all of those wearing crazy mish mashes would be the &#8220;conformists&#8221;. How crazy is that?</p>
<p> I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s due entirely to the performers on this decadence issue. They aren&#8217;t evil. They are just victims of the true evil. The capitalists MAKING MONEY OFF OF HOLLYWOOD WHORING. You get it? You see, the &#8220;money makers&#8221; are the evil ones, because they benefit the most and propagate it the most. Sure, performers get &#8220;some&#8221; money&#8230; but have you ever taken a hard look at their contracts? Where do you think MOST of the money from this stuff is actually going? See, most people don&#8217;t even know it. They don&#8217;t even know where the blood money is going. All they know is that performers get some of it, the face of evil, and that&#8217;s it. That&#8217;s not looking to the source of evil here, people. You&#8217;re not going to stop Hollywood capitalism by looking at their cannonfodder stooges, the ones that &#8220;burn out&#8221; from imbibing too much evil.</p>
<p>One of the interesting things about courtship which I only recently started to understand, is how saying you love someone is cheap. Proving it by words and deeds, is something else entirely. Since a man is composed of actions, not words, it&#8217;s important for a young male to show that he is a man, by actually doing something to back up his claims.So if he doesn&#8217;t have to do anything about it, to back up much of anything, then he doesn&#8217;t get much practice being a man. So he turns out to be a sissy boy, somebody weak that the rest of us can crush or make into a slave. Zombie. There was this phrase that I never really understood which becomes appropriate here. &#8220;He looks like someone I want to beat up and take his lunch money&#8221;. Which makes no sense to me, but for some reason people in the South and stuff sometimes say it and I hear it. But you get the picture.</p>
<p>The people who get the most money from Hollywood pay the most in lobbyists and bribes to government. So if you just think this is a &#8220;moral&#8221; issue or a fashion one&#8230; you are dead one. Hollywood evil directly funds DC evil which shuts down your civil liberties. So don&#8217;t think this is about morality. This is about power and totalitarian success. Evil leads to power, using immorality and temptation. It works. People who only know about this from preachers and bibles just don&#8217;t get it. They don&#8217;t get it. They have never seen the elephant.</p>
<p> <br />
In conclusion, the Left is evil, all they touch is evil, and if you don&#8217;t want to turn into a zombie, practice some self-discipline otherwise you won&#8217;t become a man or woman: just a slave. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
