Obama — even worse than Carter, and that’s saying a lot
Bookworm on Aug 08 2012 at 2:10 pm | Filed under: Barack Obama, Jimmy Carter
You know I’m going to be hooked on a post if, in the second paragraph, it describes Jimmy Carter in these terms:
Jimmy Carter should not have been president. He was incompetent beyond belief; angry about America’s success in the world; wanted us to get our comeuppance; and was and is a mean, reptilian and graceless little man. Being out of office has made him even angrier, meaner, smaller, more anti-American, and even more anti-semitic. He was and remains a repellent creature; if ever anybody could make me ashamed of my country, he could. I can’t forgive him for that.
Well, yes, that does about sum up the man. What’s really depressing, according to the DiploMad, a career Foreign Service employee, is that Obama is even worse:
We now are saddled with another abomination as president: one worse than Carter. The damage Obama has done to our economy and global standing, while immense, can be relatively easily fixed. The real damage he has done is more pernicious and perhaps permanent. He has participated fully and deliberately in undermining the essence of what it means to be an American. Let me explain.
By all means, do let the DiploMad explain, although I guarantee you that the post will depress you — especially if you consider that both London’s bookies and Intrade have put their money on Obama. Obama, the international man of mystery, whose past, the media harangues us, must forever be a closed book, has Leftified America, something from which it may never recover.
H/T: JKB
Email This Post To A Friend
3 Responses to “Obama — even worse than Carter, and that’s saying a lot”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







Congratulations, perhaps unwittingly, you have described what the Democrat Party and it’s minions have morphed into in the present day. A despicable group of petty, loathsome, backbiting little “creatures” totally devoid of souls and any redeeming qualities. They are total projectionists constantly accusing others of what they themselves have become.
If Carter and a son, he’d look just like … well, you get the drift.
On the plus side, the Obama campaign is headlining Carter at the convention. Is the hope Obama won’t look so bad by comparison? Or are they hoping to rejuvenate the Democratic Party’s commitment to ?transforming America”?