<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Something enjoyable for those among us who think Andrew Sullivan is an intellectual fraud and tyrant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/09/11/something-enjoyable-for-those-among-us-who-think-andrew-sullivan-is-an-intellectual-fraud-and-tyrant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/09/11/something-enjoyable-for-those-among-us-who-think-andrew-sullivan-is-an-intellectual-fraud-and-tyrant/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/09/11/something-enjoyable-for-those-among-us-who-think-andrew-sullivan-is-an-intellectual-fraud-and-tyrant/comment-page-1/#comment-145926</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=24156#comment-145926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Another example of this kind of &quot;thinking&quot; in people committed to a particular point of view has recently appeared.  Despite the testimony of many folks who now deny ever labeling any part of the human genome as &quot;junk&quot;, it was widely cited as strong evidence in favor of the materialistic origin of the code, and against the hypothesis of design.  Truth will out, of course, and it&#039;s a good day for a lot of people who valued logic over ideology.
 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/09/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/09/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;Junk No More: ENCODE Project &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; Paper Finds &quot;Biochemical Functions for 80% of the Genome&quot; &lt;/strong&gt;
A groundbreaking paper in &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; reports the results of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project, which has detected evidence of function for the &quot;vast majority&quot; of the human genome. Titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7414/pdf/nature11247.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; the paper finds an &quot;unprecedented number of functional elements,&quot; where &quot;a surprisingly large amount of the human genome&quot; appears functional. Based upon current knowledge, the paper concludes that at least 80% of the human genome is now known to be functional:
 
 
The article in Nature referred to appears here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/encode-the-human-encyclopaedia-1.11312&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.nature.com/news/encode-the-human-encyclopaedia-1.11312&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
Another example of this kind of &#8220;thinking&#8221; in people committed to a particular point of view has recently appeared.  Despite the testimony of many folks who now deny ever labeling any part of the human genome as &#8220;junk&#8221;, it was widely cited as strong evidence in favor of the materialistic origin of the code, and against the hypothesis of design.  Truth will out, of course, and it&#8217;s a good day for a lot of people who valued logic over ideology.<br />
 </p>
<p><a href="http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/09/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/09/junk_no_more_en_1064001.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Junk No More: ENCODE Project <em>Nature</em> Paper Finds &#8220;Biochemical Functions for 80% of the Genome&#8221; </strong><br />
A groundbreaking paper in <em>Nature</em> reports the results of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project, which has detected evidence of function for the &#8220;vast majority&#8221; of the human genome. Titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v489/n7414/pdf/nature11247.pdf" rel="nofollow">An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome</a>,&#8221; the paper finds an &#8220;unprecedented number of functional elements,&#8221; where &#8220;a surprisingly large amount of the human genome&#8221; appears functional. Based upon current knowledge, the paper concludes that at least 80% of the human genome is now known to be functional:<br />
 <br />
 <br />
The article in Nature referred to appears here:<br />
<a href="http://www.nature.com/news/encode-the-human-encyclopaedia-1.11312" rel="nofollow">http://www.nature.com/news/encode-the-human-encyclopaedia-1.11312</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
