<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conservatives need a new ground game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/</link>
	<description>Conservatives deal with facts and reach conclusions; liberals have conclusions and sell them as facts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think there is any alternative but to let the big government movement play itself out, which will take a lot longer than we would like.  Look how long it survived behind the Iron Curtain, and many people there still favor it.
 
This is a good start on that process:
http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20121107/tottenville/staten-island-fema-disaster-center-shuts-doors-due-weather]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is any alternative but to let the big government movement play itself out, which will take a lot longer than we would like.  Look how long it survived behind the Iron Curtain, and many people there still favor it.<br />
 <br />
This is a good start on that process:<br />
<a href="http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20121107/tottenville/staten-island-fema-disaster-center-shuts-doors-due-weather" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20121107/tottenville/staten-island-fema-disaster-center-shuts-doors-due-weather</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKB</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148070</link>
		<dc:creator>JKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was considering the hopeful part and realized a critical need.  As we saw when the Soviet Union collapsed, capitalism in the natural state people revert to when freed.  However, the former soviet states fell into the particularly brutal crony capitalism because they had not tradition of fair courts and the other assorted institutions that permit capitalism for all without favoring strongmen to flourish.  We must work underground to keep these traditions alive for when the social state with its favored cronies fails.  

One part of the new ground game needs to leverage the internet to keep these western traditions alive for future generations.  Just places that progress from simple to detailed where the curious can learn how and why to implement the contracts, independent mediation, etc.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering the hopeful part and realized a critical need.  As we saw when the Soviet Union collapsed, capitalism in the natural state people revert to when freed.  However, the former soviet states fell into the particularly brutal crony capitalism because they had not tradition of fair courts and the other assorted institutions that permit capitalism for all without favoring strongmen to flourish.  We must work underground to keep these traditions alive for when the social state with its favored cronies fails.  </p>
<p>One part of the new ground game needs to leverage the internet to keep these western traditions alive for future generations.  Just places that progress from simple to detailed where the curious can learn how and why to implement the contracts, independent mediation, etc.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Devx</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148054</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Devx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An excerpt from Paul Scott&#039;s long screed above.  I urge you to read this paragraph SLOWLY and let it really sink in.


&lt;em&gt;Mitt Romney probably came closer to winning the presidency than any Republican could have this election. If Chris Christie ran, he could never have gotten the Republican nomination in this Republican atmosphere — compared to today’s radical far right, Chris Christie is a moderate. That wasn’t going to fly with today’s Republican electorate. So, Chris Christie wasn’t getting the GOP nomination if he ran, despite whatever the weeping Ann Coulter postured.&lt;/em&gt;
 
In fact, read the surrounding paragraphs to.

Oh, the concern for our well-being!  The words of wisdom, urging us toward self-improvement, prescribed for us From Above.

What this is, is a gleeful child visiting the conservative blog&#039;s commentary area, purely to rub our noses in it.  For the purpose solely of self-gratification.

Once you got done writing and you posted... Did it feel good once you posted this spurt resulting from those long minutes of self-gratification?  You do seem to have gotten quite excited at various times during the exercise.  Did you wake the neighbors?  Now that you&#039;re done, and your emissions above sit there cold and inert, are you still as happy about the whole thing as you were at that moment of Ultimate Posting?

How tawdry and pathetic.


 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excerpt from Paul Scott&#8217;s long screed above.  I urge you to read this paragraph SLOWLY and let it really sink in.</p>
<p><em>Mitt Romney probably came closer to winning the presidency than any Republican could have this election. If Chris Christie ran, he could never have gotten the Republican nomination in this Republican atmosphere — compared to today’s radical far right, Chris Christie is a moderate. That wasn’t going to fly with today’s Republican electorate. So, Chris Christie wasn’t getting the GOP nomination if he ran, despite whatever the weeping Ann Coulter postured.</em><br />
 <br />
In fact, read the surrounding paragraphs to.</p>
<p>Oh, the concern for our well-being!  The words of wisdom, urging us toward self-improvement, prescribed for us From Above.</p>
<p>What this is, is a gleeful child visiting the conservative blog&#8217;s commentary area, purely to rub our noses in it.  For the purpose solely of self-gratification.</p>
<p>Once you got done writing and you posted&#8230; Did it feel good once you posted this spurt resulting from those long minutes of self-gratification?  You do seem to have gotten quite excited at various times during the exercise.  Did you wake the neighbors?  Now that you&#8217;re done, and your emissions above sit there cold and inert, are you still as happy about the whole thing as you were at that moment of Ultimate Posting?</p>
<p>How tawdry and pathetic.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148053</link>
		<dc:creator>Navy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 04:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looming in the foreground is the “fiscal cliff” as well as the deficit that even the Democrats know must be dealt with.  How will the Republican House respond?  The old way is to block the called for tax increases in the House and we all know that leads to the MSM pointing at them shouting “Gridlock,  it’s all the Republican’s fault”.  Why not go along with all the tax increases agreeing that they will only be used to reduce the deficit.  An agreement we know the Democrats will pull away from as soon as they can.  Get all the Democrat house members to vote for it and the bare minimum of Republicans on board to get it to pass.  Give the economy four years to really tank, BobK has already laid out what is going to happen, let it really get bad and hope a majority of Americans will recognize the progressive way really does not work.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looming in the foreground is the “fiscal cliff” as well as the deficit that even the Democrats know must be dealt with.  How will the Republican House respond?  The old way is to block the called for tax increases in the House and we all know that leads to the MSM pointing at them shouting “Gridlock,  it’s all the Republican’s fault”.  Why not go along with all the tax increases agreeing that they will only be used to reduce the deficit.  An agreement we know the Democrats will pull away from as soon as they can.  Get all the Democrat house members to vote for it and the bare minimum of Republicans on board to get it to pass.  Give the economy four years to really tank, BobK has already laid out what is going to happen, let it really get bad and hope a majority of Americans will recognize the progressive way really does not work.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Martel</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148039</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Martel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gpc31, I think you raise a good point about many people&#039;s inability to understand cause and effect. (A fine example is PaulScott&#039;s doubleplusgood duckspeak recital above.) Will the coming catastrophes---whether slo-mo or fast---be something they connect with Obama, or will poor W be doomed to play Emmanuel Goldstein forever in the &quot;progressive&quot; mind?
 
But do keep in mind that 57 million people did &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; vote for Obama. They weren&#039;t fooled by crass appeals to their genitals or sense of entitlement. Some might say that the number of antis will diminish as Obama&#039;s raids on the economy continue and he brings more and more people into the taker fold. 
 
However, you point out that reality is a harsh mistress. As the federal gravy train runs out of other people&#039;s coal, or the Chinese wallop our decimated navy off of Taiwan, or raging inflation means poor PaulScott is paying $27 for his soup-and-sandwich special in his all-white beach enclave, many people are going to realize that although W is like the perfidious Jews in the leftist mind, it&#039;s just not that easy to wreck a country when you live on a dusty ranch 1,300 miles from the capital you left 10 years before. 
 
That means we&#039;ll get some recruits the hard way. But once those eyes are open, they will never close.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gpc31, I think you raise a good point about many people&#8217;s inability to understand cause and effect. (A fine example is PaulScott&#8217;s doubleplusgood duckspeak recital above.) Will the coming catastrophes&#8212;whether slo-mo or fast&#8212;be something they connect with Obama, or will poor W be doomed to play Emmanuel Goldstein forever in the &#8220;progressive&#8221; mind?<br />
 <br />
But do keep in mind that 57 million people did <em>not</em> vote for Obama. They weren&#8217;t fooled by crass appeals to their genitals or sense of entitlement. Some might say that the number of antis will diminish as Obama&#8217;s raids on the economy continue and he brings more and more people into the taker fold.<br />
 <br />
However, you point out that reality is a harsh mistress. As the federal gravy train runs out of other people&#8217;s coal, or the Chinese wallop our decimated navy off of Taiwan, or raging inflation means poor PaulScott is paying $27 for his soup-and-sandwich special in his all-white beach enclave, many people are going to realize that although W is like the perfidious Jews in the leftist mind, it&#8217;s just not that easy to wreck a country when you live on a dusty ranch 1,300 miles from the capital you left 10 years before.<br />
 <br />
That means we&#8217;ll get some recruits the hard way. But once those eyes are open, they will never close.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobK</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148037</link>
		<dc:creator>BobK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PaulScott, I don&#039;t know if the people you mention are angry.  I do know that you come across as smugly self-satisfied.  Today, you might have cause for that, because your prejudices and preconceptions have been validated by slightly more than 50% of your countrymen.  With the full intent of deflating your satisfaction, I invite you to carefully consider the REAL WORLD consequences of last night&#039;s election, via &lt;a href=&quot;http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-permanent-sunset-of-republican.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rev. Donald Sensing&lt;/a&gt; - father, veteran, minister of the Gospel: ***** Goodbye, party of Lincoln. It was fun while it lasted. Last one out turn out the lights. Before Democrat voters rejoice, they should soberly consider what this means:

-  A permanent decline in your standard of living and especially that of your children,
-  A permanently-growing federal government, consuming growing proportions of America&#039;s wealth,
-  And expanding government control or outright ownership of the country&#039;s financial activity,
-  Per-capita shrinkage of economic activity,
-  An expansive federal bureaucracy, with exponentially exploding regulatory authority over the way you live your daily lives in ways you cannot even imagine yet,
-  And therefore greater and greater restrictions on your freedoms to say what you want, do what you want, possess what you want, except you will have federally-funded sex lives without restriction, because Democrats think that you will acquiesce to being stripped you of all your freedoms without protest as long as they pay for your sex. And they are right. You will gladly exchange your liberty for censure-less rolls in the hay. 
-  Crony capitalism? You ain&#039;t seen nothing yet. Increasingly, government contracts and stimulus money (by whatever name) will be funneled to the ideologically pure. You, the ordinary Democrat voter, will be frozen out of this largess. You are of neither use nor concern to the Party except on election day.
-  Diminishment of your health and shorter life spans because Obamacare is absolutely designed for the benefit of government and its licensed financial allies, not you,
-  Expanding federal debt almost without end, meaning that even as your own personal income falls, you will pay an ever-higher proportion of it in taxes of one kind or another (but don&#039;t worry, you will blindly drink the Kool-Aid that only &quot;the rich&quot; are paying more taxes),
-  &quot;Almost without end,&quot; because the end will come to the gravy train, and it will be truly apocalyptic when it does. &quot;Chaos&quot; does not even begin to describe it; in fact, chaos will be the best outcome you can expect. Oh, when this happens (when, not if) you will lose absolutely everything you own. Ev. Ry. Thing. Because there is no one to bail America out.

But remember: you asked for it on Nov. 6, 2012. As H. L. Mencken said, &quot;Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.&quot; You just got what you want. The hard part that you cannot even fathom is now being born. ***** Amen, Rev. Sensing! PaulScott, please look at each of these points and tell me, if you can, where Rev. Sensing&#039;s analysis is off.  Perhaps your response will make me and others feel better about the years to come.
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PaulScott, I don&#8217;t know if the people you mention are angry.  I do know that you come across as smugly self-satisfied.  Today, you might have cause for that, because your prejudices and preconceptions have been validated by slightly more than 50% of your countrymen.  With the full intent of deflating your satisfaction, I invite you to carefully consider the REAL WORLD consequences of last night&#8217;s election, via <a href="http://senseofevents.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-permanent-sunset-of-republican.html" rel="nofollow">Rev. Donald Sensing</a> &#8211; father, veteran, minister of the Gospel: ***** Goodbye, party of Lincoln. It was fun while it lasted. Last one out turn out the lights. Before Democrat voters rejoice, they should soberly consider what this means:</p>
<p>-  A permanent decline in your standard of living and especially that of your children,<br />
-  A permanently-growing federal government, consuming growing proportions of America&#8217;s wealth,<br />
-  And expanding government control or outright ownership of the country&#8217;s financial activity,<br />
-  Per-capita shrinkage of economic activity,<br />
-  An expansive federal bureaucracy, with exponentially exploding regulatory authority over the way you live your daily lives in ways you cannot even imagine yet,<br />
-  And therefore greater and greater restrictions on your freedoms to say what you want, do what you want, possess what you want, except you will have federally-funded sex lives without restriction, because Democrats think that you will acquiesce to being stripped you of all your freedoms without protest as long as they pay for your sex. And they are right. You will gladly exchange your liberty for censure-less rolls in the hay. <br />
-  Crony capitalism? You ain&#8217;t seen nothing yet. Increasingly, government contracts and stimulus money (by whatever name) will be funneled to the ideologically pure. You, the ordinary Democrat voter, will be frozen out of this largess. You are of neither use nor concern to the Party except on election day.<br />
-  Diminishment of your health and shorter life spans because Obamacare is absolutely designed for the benefit of government and its licensed financial allies, not you,<br />
-  Expanding federal debt almost without end, meaning that even as your own personal income falls, you will pay an ever-higher proportion of it in taxes of one kind or another (but don&#8217;t worry, you will blindly drink the Kool-Aid that only &#8220;the rich&#8221; are paying more taxes),<br />
-  &#8221;Almost without end,&#8221; because the end will come to the gravy train, and it will be truly apocalyptic when it does. &#8220;Chaos&#8221; does not even begin to describe it; in fact, chaos will be the best outcome you can expect. Oh, when this happens (when, not if) you will lose absolutely everything you own. Ev. Ry. Thing. Because there is no one to bail America out.</p>
<p>But remember: you asked for it on Nov. 6, 2012. As H. L. Mencken said, &#8220;Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.&#8221; You just got what you want. The hard part that you cannot even fathom is now being born. ***** Amen, Rev. Sensing! PaulScott, please look at each of these points and tell me, if you can, where Rev. Sensing&#8217;s analysis is off.  Perhaps your response will make me and others feel better about the years to come.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpc31</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148030</link>
		<dc:creator>gpc31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book,
I think you might be in denial in the first part of your post, because you share a dubious yet key assumption along with the estimable Taranto, namely, that the American public will blame Obama for any failed policies.
 
Had McCain been elected, given the economic trauma of the last four years, the Republican Party would have been destroyed forever.  (So, to that extent, I&#039;m glad Obama won in 2008.)  However, no matter how bad things get during the next four years, the media will continue to cover for Obama.  Second, as I mentioned in another post, I question whether the American people are still able to connect cause and effect in the cultural-political-economic realm -- it&#039;s all evil Booosh&#039;s fault.  Third, during economic crises people generally want more, not less government.  Fourth, given the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, are we past the point of no return?  Could we scale back government regulation even if we wanted to?  Finally, perhaps &quot;the worse, the better&quot;; perhaps heightening in the contradictions; perhaps it will take a complete breakdown in the blue model combined with simultaneous foreign crises to restore a republican (small &quot;r&quot;), constitutional government.
 
Also, you will need to specify in advance what you consider &quot;success&quot; over the next four years before you prepare to revise your political beliefs.  For example, would the mere absence of calamity qualify as success?  A shallow recovery?  Saying that you will know it when you see it isn&#039;t good enough because we are all vulnerable to post hoc rationalization (&quot;it could be worse...&quot;).  Plus Obama is a master of taking credit for anything good that happens (e.g., increased US energy production).
 
All of the foregoing is not to deny the need for action; it&#039;s important to question, to discuss, and to fight before embarking on the most effective course.
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Book,<br />
I think you might be in denial in the first part of your post, because you share a dubious yet key assumption along with the estimable Taranto, namely, that the American public will blame Obama for any failed policies.<br />
 <br />
Had McCain been elected, given the economic trauma of the last four years, the Republican Party would have been destroyed forever.  (So, to that extent, I&#8217;m glad Obama won in 2008.)  However, no matter how bad things get during the next four years, the media will continue to cover for Obama.  Second, as I mentioned in another post, I question whether the American people are still able to connect cause and effect in the cultural-political-economic realm &#8212; it&#8217;s all evil Booosh&#8217;s fault.  Third, during economic crises people generally want more, not less government.  Fourth, given the Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare, are we past the point of no return?  Could we scale back government regulation even if we wanted to?  Finally, perhaps &#8220;the worse, the better&#8221;; perhaps heightening in the contradictions; perhaps it will take a complete breakdown in the blue model combined with simultaneous foreign crises to restore a republican (small &#8220;r&#8221;), constitutional government.<br />
 <br />
Also, you will need to specify in advance what you consider &#8220;success&#8221; over the next four years before you prepare to revise your political beliefs.  For example, would the mere absence of calamity qualify as success?  A shallow recovery?  Saying that you will know it when you see it isn&#8217;t good enough because we are all vulnerable to post hoc rationalization (&#8220;it could be worse&#8230;&#8221;).  Plus Obama is a master of taking credit for anything good that happens (e.g., increased US energy production).<br />
 <br />
All of the foregoing is not to deny the need for action; it&#8217;s important to question, to discuss, and to fight before embarking on the most effective course.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulScott</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148026</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulScott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought you guys would like this:


I never expected to ever say, &quot;Poor Ann Coulter.&quot; But - poor Ann Coulter. I really feel badly for her, in a manner of speaking. But not for the reason you think. Not because Barack Obama was re-elected President of the United States. Rather, I feel bad for her because of her responsibility in that victory.
Remember the famous video where Ms. Coulter says, &quot;If Chris Christie doesn&#039;t run we&#039;ll nominate Mitt Romney and we will lose&quot;?
Now, I&#039;m sure that many people, Ann Coulter included, think that this statement was prescient and shows her to be oh-so wise in her election prediction. Except that it doesn&#039;t. It shows her culpability.
Mitt Romney probably came closer to winning the presidency than any Republican could have this election. If Chris Christie ran, he could never have gotten the Republican nomination in this Republican atmosphere -- compared to today&#039;s radical far right, Chris Christie is a moderate. That wasn&#039;t going to fly with today&#039;s Republican electorate. So, Chris Christie wasn&#039;t getting the GOP nomination if he ran, despite whatever the weeping Ann Coulter postured.
However, what Ann Coulter did do was help build up the pedestal of Chris Christie among Republicans who didn&#039;t really know him. She helped make Chris Christie seem to Republicans that he was The Republican Savior. She helped make Chris Christie&#039;s voice so deeply important to Republicans that he became the keynote speaker at the Republican National Convention.
So, when it turned out that Chris Christie wasn&#039;t exactly what Ann Coulter suggested he was, nor what she tried to get Republicans to believe, and Chris Christie then publicly and repeatedly and powerfully embraced the strong leadership of President Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, it made Gov. Christie&#039;s actions all the more significant to voters.
Ann Coulter was not prescient in her election prediction. Ann Coulter helped in her own inimitable, thoughtless, empty, soulless way to help get Barack Obama elected. She created her own self-fulfilling prophecy.
Poor Ann Coulter. She must be so pissed off. The heart bleeds.
Mitch McConnell must be so pissed off, too. After doing one of the most irresponsible things any Senate party leader has ever done by declaring that his Number One priority was not working to help America but rather to make sure that Barack Obama wasn&#039;t re-elected, he spent four years shirking his sworn duties and working instead to defeat the president. And after all of that effort, he wasn&#039;t able to do it. Despite his great efforts of his Number One priority, President Barack Obama was re-elected. Mitch McConnell must be so pissed off.
In fact, the whole Republican Senate must be so pissed off. When President Obama nominated Elizabeth Warren to be head of the Consumer Protection Agency, an important but reasonably piddly bureau, GOP senators fought her with the fervor of missionary crusaders and wouldn&#039;t approve her for the job. And so, what Elizabeth Warren did next was announce her candidacy for the Senate in Massachusetts. If the Republican senators had simply approved Elizabeth Warren to head a simple bureaucratic job, she never would have run for the Senate, and Republican Scott Brown would have been re-elected. Republican senators must be so pissed off. Your heart really goes out to them. In a manner of speaking.
And I know that Donald Trump is pissed off. After gathering all this evidence that Barack Obama wasn&#039;t born in America and never showing it to anyone, and then having Mr. Obama re-elected to office anyway, it must be so galling to him.
Imagine how pissed off Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers and Sheldon Adelson must be, having spent all that money to defeat Barack Obama -- hundreds of millions of dollars -- and having absolutely nothing to show for it. I spent ten bucks yesterday for lunch, and at least I got a sandwich and bowl of soup.
All those people who&#039;d been slamming Nate Silver must be incredibly pissed off seeing how remarkably accurate he was with his statistics. Again.
Paul Ryan must be really pissed off, too. He had been a Rising Star Congressman in the Republican Party, and now he&#039;s a losing vice-presidential candidate -- not one of whom in the history of the United States has ever been elected president. That must sting.
I suspect that Mitt Romney might be pissed off, though I&#039;ve never quite had any idea how or what he feels about anything. For all I know, he&#039;s just glad that he never had to reveal what was in his tax returns.
Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock must be so pissed off at opening their mouths.
But most of all, I suspect that the election results must be other-world mortifying to those radical far right Republicans who are so pissed off that everything they stand for has been repudiated. In a terrible economy, with 7.9 unemployment, a $16 trillion national debt and a $1 trillion budget deficit, Barack Obama still beat Republicans and won re-election. After lambasting Barack Obama for four years as a Socialist, Nazi, Muslim, terrorist Kenyan; calling him &quot;retarded,&quot; &quot;lazy&quot; and &quot;stupid;&quot; using racist innuendos to surreptitiously demean him, and making defeating him the Number One priority for four years, the Republican Party still couldn&#039;t defeat Barack Obama. After all this, after all they&#039;ve been doing for four years to enrage the American public... the American public wasn&#039;t enraged. In fact, for all that, the mere fact that Barack Obama actually got re-elected President of the United States is one of the more remarkable victories and testaments of support (and renunciation of conservative agendas) as we&#039;ve seen in America.
And we haven&#039;t even touched on Claire McCaskill, Tammy Baldwin, Sherrod Brown, Tim Kaine and the rest of the Democratic and progressive agenda victories, all of which point strongly to a rejection of the far right social agenda and support of the president&#039;s leadership. Well, I guess that affordable health care won&#039;t be dismantled now, the day after inauguration...
The radical far right must be so pissed off. But they only have themselves to blame. Because they&#039;ve built this rejected, Tea Party-ish bed for eight years.
The rest of American -- Democrats and Republicans alike -- they see this as democracy. The way America goes. Differences of opinions, different issues, and you accept it and move on.
Forward.
But mainly, Ann Coulter must be really pissed off.
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought you guys would like this:</p>
<p>I never expected to ever say, &#8220;Poor Ann Coulter.&#8221; But &#8211; poor Ann Coulter. I really feel badly for her, in a manner of speaking. But not for the reason you think. Not because Barack Obama was re-elected President of the United States. Rather, I feel bad for her because of her responsibility in that victory.<br />
Remember the famous video where Ms. Coulter says, &#8220;If Chris Christie doesn&#8217;t run we&#8217;ll nominate Mitt Romney and we will lose&#8221;?<br />
Now, I&#8217;m sure that many people, Ann Coulter included, think that this statement was prescient and shows her to be oh-so wise in her election prediction. Except that it doesn&#8217;t. It shows her culpability.<br />
Mitt Romney probably came closer to winning the presidency than any Republican could have this election. If Chris Christie ran, he could never have gotten the Republican nomination in this Republican atmosphere &#8212; compared to today&#8217;s radical far right, Chris Christie is a moderate. That wasn&#8217;t going to fly with today&#8217;s Republican electorate. So, Chris Christie wasn&#8217;t getting the GOP nomination if he ran, despite whatever the weeping Ann Coulter postured.<br />
However, what Ann Coulter did do was help build up the pedestal of Chris Christie among Republicans who didn&#8217;t really know him. She helped make Chris Christie seem to Republicans that he was The Republican Savior. She helped make Chris Christie&#8217;s voice so deeply important to Republicans that he became the keynote speaker at the Republican National Convention.<br />
So, when it turned out that Chris Christie wasn&#8217;t exactly what Ann Coulter suggested he was, nor what she tried to get Republicans to believe, and Chris Christie then publicly and repeatedly and powerfully embraced the strong leadership of President Obama in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, it made Gov. Christie&#8217;s actions all the more significant to voters.<br />
Ann Coulter was not prescient in her election prediction. Ann Coulter helped in her own inimitable, thoughtless, empty, soulless way to help get Barack Obama elected. She created her own self-fulfilling prophecy.<br />
Poor Ann Coulter. She must be so pissed off. The heart bleeds.<br />
Mitch McConnell must be so pissed off, too. After doing one of the most irresponsible things any Senate party leader has ever done by declaring that his Number One priority was not working to help America but rather to make sure that Barack Obama wasn&#8217;t re-elected, he spent four years shirking his sworn duties and working instead to defeat the president. And after all of that effort, he wasn&#8217;t able to do it. Despite his great efforts of his Number One priority, President Barack Obama was re-elected. Mitch McConnell must be so pissed off.<br />
In fact, the whole Republican Senate must be so pissed off. When President Obama nominated Elizabeth Warren to be head of the Consumer Protection Agency, an important but reasonably piddly bureau, GOP senators fought her with the fervor of missionary crusaders and wouldn&#8217;t approve her for the job. And so, what Elizabeth Warren did next was announce her candidacy for the Senate in Massachusetts. If the Republican senators had simply approved Elizabeth Warren to head a simple bureaucratic job, she never would have run for the Senate, and Republican Scott Brown would have been re-elected. Republican senators must be so pissed off. Your heart really goes out to them. In a manner of speaking.<br />
And I know that Donald Trump is pissed off. After gathering all this evidence that Barack Obama wasn&#8217;t born in America and never showing it to anyone, and then having Mr. Obama re-elected to office anyway, it must be so galling to him.<br />
Imagine how pissed off Karl Rove, the Koch Brothers and Sheldon Adelson must be, having spent all that money to defeat Barack Obama &#8212; hundreds of millions of dollars &#8212; and having absolutely nothing to show for it. I spent ten bucks yesterday for lunch, and at least I got a sandwich and bowl of soup.<br />
All those people who&#8217;d been slamming Nate Silver must be incredibly pissed off seeing how remarkably accurate he was with his statistics. Again.<br />
Paul Ryan must be really pissed off, too. He had been a Rising Star Congressman in the Republican Party, and now he&#8217;s a losing vice-presidential candidate &#8212; not one of whom in the history of the United States has ever been elected president. That must sting.<br />
I suspect that Mitt Romney might be pissed off, though I&#8217;ve never quite had any idea how or what he feels about anything. For all I know, he&#8217;s just glad that he never had to reveal what was in his tax returns.<br />
Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock must be so pissed off at opening their mouths.<br />
But most of all, I suspect that the election results must be other-world mortifying to those radical far right Republicans who are so pissed off that everything they stand for has been repudiated. In a terrible economy, with 7.9 unemployment, a $16 trillion national debt and a $1 trillion budget deficit, Barack Obama still beat Republicans and won re-election. After lambasting Barack Obama for four years as a Socialist, Nazi, Muslim, terrorist Kenyan; calling him &#8220;retarded,&#8221; &#8220;lazy&#8221; and &#8220;stupid;&#8221; using racist innuendos to surreptitiously demean him, and making defeating him the Number One priority for four years, the Republican Party still couldn&#8217;t defeat Barack Obama. After all this, after all they&#8217;ve been doing for four years to enrage the American public&#8230; the American public wasn&#8217;t enraged. In fact, for all that, the mere fact that Barack Obama actually got re-elected President of the United States is one of the more remarkable victories and testaments of support (and renunciation of conservative agendas) as we&#8217;ve seen in America.<br />
And we haven&#8217;t even touched on Claire McCaskill, Tammy Baldwin, Sherrod Brown, Tim Kaine and the rest of the Democratic and progressive agenda victories, all of which point strongly to a rejection of the far right social agenda and support of the president&#8217;s leadership. Well, I guess that affordable health care won&#8217;t be dismantled now, the day after inauguration&#8230;<br />
The radical far right must be so pissed off. But they only have themselves to blame. Because they&#8217;ve built this rejected, Tea Party-ish bed for eight years.<br />
The rest of American &#8212; Democrats and Republicans alike &#8212; they see this as democracy. The way America goes. Differences of opinions, different issues, and you accept it and move on.<br />
Forward.<br />
But mainly, Ann Coulter must be really pissed off.<br />
 <br />
 <br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lemieux</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148024</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lemieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This will take time. To build on your analogy of the French Revolution, the revolution lasted almost ten awful, bloody years. Then there was a counter-revolution subverted by a rising Napoleon, who subsequently led France to momentary glory followed by monumental, horrific disaster. Only then, when the awful consequences of the French revolution had been absorbed 20-30 years after the revolution, did a semblance of normalcy return and a fundamental reassertion of the underlying French culture reassert itself. 

Today, events move far more quickly in an age of electronic information exchange, so it probably won&#039;t take as long for consequences to work their way through the system. I have no doubt that normalcy will return after we suffer the inevitable, horrific consequences of which we Cassandras have been warning. I also have no doubt that a very different America will emerge. Perhaps it is as they say, the natural lifespan of a democracy is 250 years.

In the meantime, my attentions will be on my immediate family and figuring out how we will adapt and survive. Speaking only partly metaphorically, I will try to keep my family upwind from the blast zones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will take time. To build on your analogy of the French Revolution, the revolution lasted almost ten awful, bloody years. Then there was a counter-revolution subverted by a rising Napoleon, who subsequently led France to momentary glory followed by monumental, horrific disaster. Only then, when the awful consequences of the French revolution had been absorbed 20-30 years after the revolution, did a semblance of normalcy return and a fundamental reassertion of the underlying French culture reassert itself. </p>
<p>Today, events move far more quickly in an age of electronic information exchange, so it probably won&#8217;t take as long for consequences to work their way through the system. I have no doubt that normalcy will return after we suffer the inevitable, horrific consequences of which we Cassandras have been warning. I also have no doubt that a very different America will emerge. Perhaps it is as they say, the natural lifespan of a democracy is 250 years.</p>
<p>In the meantime, my attentions will be on my immediate family and figuring out how we will adapt and survive. Speaking only partly metaphorically, I will try to keep my family upwind from the blast zones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huan</title>
		<link>http://www.bookwormroom.com/2012/11/07/conservatives-need-a-new-ground-game/comment-page-1/#comment-148023</link>
		<dc:creator>Huan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookwormroom.com/?p=25129#comment-148023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[we need to wage a war in the cultural media and educate americans on why conservatism is better.
in news, sport, entertainment, eductation, everywhere and anywhere]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we need to wage a war in the cultural media and educate americans on why conservatism is better.<br />
in news, sport, entertainment, eductation, everywhere and anywhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
